↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : GEO183+2 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr  9 06:14:04 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 4.12s 2.04s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  12 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (  15   ~;  14   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (  26   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(f_57,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ distinct_points(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',apart1) ).

tff(f_144,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,U,V] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
          & convergent_lines(U,V)
          & ~ distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)) )
       => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X,U)
          & ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,U) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_124,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_lines(Y,Z)
        | apart_point_and_line(X,Z) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',ceq2) ).

tff(f_90,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(Z,line_connecting(X,Y))
       => ( distinct_points(Z,X)
          & distinct_points(Z,Y) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',con1) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1] : ~ distinct_points(X_1,X_1),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3')
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).

tff(c_50,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_99,plain,
    ! [X_48,Z_49,Y_50] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X_48,Z_49)
      | distinct_lines(Y_50,Z_49)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X_48,Y_50) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_124]) ).

tff(c_103,plain,
    ! [Z_51] :
      ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',Z_51)
      | distinct_lines('#skF_3',Z_51) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_99]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).

tff(c_114,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_32]) ).

tff(c_157,plain,
    ! [Z_58,X_59,Y_60] :
      ( distinct_points(Z_58,X_59)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(Z_58,line_connecting(X_59,Y_60))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_59,Y_60) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_90]) ).

tff(c_163,plain,
    ( distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_1')
    | ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_157]) ).

tff(c_169,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_1'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_36,c_163]) ).

tff(c_171,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_169]) ).

tff(c_172,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_239,plain,
    ! [X_77,Z_78,Y_79] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X_77,Z_78)
      | distinct_lines(Y_79,Z_78)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X_77,Y_79) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_124]) ).

tff(c_243,plain,
    ! [Z_80] :
      ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',Z_80)
      | distinct_lines('#skF_3',Z_80) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_172,c_239]) ).

tff(c_254,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_243,c_32]) ).

tff(c_881,plain,
    ! [Z_127,Y_128,X_129] :
      ( distinct_points(Z_127,Y_128)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(Z_127,line_connecting(X_129,Y_128))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_129,Y_128) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_90]) ).

tff(c_887,plain,
    ( distinct_points('#skF_2','#skF_2')
    | ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_254,c_881]) ).

tff(c_893,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_2','#skF_2'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_36,c_887]) ).

tff(c_895,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_893]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : GEO183+2 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Apr  7 19:55:19 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.12/2.04  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.12/2.04  
% 4.12/2.04  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------