%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.7
% Problem : GEO183+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:16 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.90s 1.04s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.09 % Problem : GEO183+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.09 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Fri Jun 21 09:00:23 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.50 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.90/1.04 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.90/1.04 % File :CSE---1.7
% 0.90/1.04 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.90/1.04 % Transform :cnf
% 0.90/1.04 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.90/1.04 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.90/1.04
% 0.90/1.04 % Result :Theorem 0.510000s
% 0.90/1.04 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.510000s
% 0.90/1.04 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.90/1.04 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.90/1.04 % File : GEO183+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.90/1.04 % Domain : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.90/1.04 % Problem : Lemma on symmetry and apartness
% 0.90/1.04 % Version : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.90/1.04 % English : If X and Y are distinct points, then they are incident with
% 0.90/1.04 % the line that is equal to the line connecting the points.
% 0.90/1.04
% 0.90/1.04 % Refs : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.90/1.04 % : [Li97] Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 0.90/1.04 % : [Li98] Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 0.90/1.04 % : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.90/1.04 % Source : [ILTP]
% 0.90/1.04 % Names :
% 0.90/1.04
% 0.90/1.04 % Status : Theorem
% 0.90/1.04 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.11 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.90/1.04 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% 0.90/1.04 % Number of atoms : 39 ( 0 equ)
% 0.90/1.04 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 3 avg)
% 0.90/1.04 % Number of connectives : 32 ( 6 ~; 9 |; 5 &)
% 0.90/1.04 % ( 0 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.90/1.04 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% 0.90/1.04 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.90/1.04 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.90/1.04 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.90/1.04 % Number of variables : 34 ( 34 !; 0 ?)
% 0.90/1.04 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.90/1.04
% 0.90/1.04 % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.90/1.04 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.90/1.04 include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 0.90/1.04 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.90/1.04 fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.90/1.04 ! [X,Y,U,V] :
% 0.90/1.04 ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 0.90/1.04 & convergent_lines(U,V)
% 0.90/1.04 & ~ distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)) )
% 0.90/1.04 => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X,U)
% 0.90/1.04 & ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,U) ) ) ).
% 0.90/1.04
% 0.90/1.04 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.90/1.04 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.90/1.04 % Proof found
% 0.90/1.04 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.90/1.04 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.90/1.05 %ClaNum:18(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.90/1.05 %VarNum:80(SingletonVarNum:36)
% 0.90/1.05 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.90/1.05 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.90/1.05 %SharedTerms:10
% 0.90/1.05 %goalClause: 1 2 6 7
% 0.90/1.05 %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.90/1.05 [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.90/1.05 [2]P2(a3,a4)
% 0.90/1.05 [6]~P4(a3,f5(a1,a2))
% 0.90/1.05 [3]~P1(x31,x31)
% 0.90/1.05 [4]~P4(x41,x41)
% 0.90/1.05 [5]~P2(x51,x51)
% 0.90/1.05 [7]P3(a1,a3)+P3(a2,a3)
% 0.90/1.05 [8]~P2(x81,x82)+P4(x81,x82)
% 0.90/1.05 [9]~P1(x93,x91)+P1(x91,x92)+P1(x93,x92)
% 0.90/1.05 [10]~P3(x101,x103)+P1(x101,x102)+P3(x102,x103)
% 0.90/1.05 [11]~P4(x113,x111)+P4(x111,x112)+P4(x113,x112)
% 0.90/1.05 [12]~P3(x123,x121)+P4(x121,x122)+P3(x123,x122)
% 0.90/1.05 [13]~P2(x133,x131)+P2(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x132)
% 0.90/1.05 [14]~P2(x142,x143)+~P3(x141,x143)+P1(x141,f6(x142,x143))
% 0.90/1.05 [15]~P2(x152,x153)+~P3(x151,x152)+P1(x151,f6(x152,x153))
% 0.90/1.05 [16]P1(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x162)+~P3(x161,f5(x163,x162))
% 0.90/1.05 [17]P1(x171,x172)+~P1(x172,x173)+~P3(x171,f5(x172,x173))
% 0.90/1.05 [18]P3(x184,x183)+~P1(x184,x181)+~P4(x183,x182)+P3(x181,x182)+P3(x181,x183)+P3(x184,x182)
% 0.90/1.05 %EqnAxiom
% 0.90/1.05
% 0.90/1.05 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.90/1.05 cnf(115,plain,
% 0.90/1.05 (P3(a1,f5(a1,a2))+P3(a2,a3)),
% 0.90/1.05 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,7,12])).
% 0.90/1.05 cnf(116,plain,
% 0.90/1.05 (P3(a2,a3)),
% 0.90/1.05 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,115,17])).
% 0.90/1.05 cnf(214,plain,
% 0.90/1.05 (~P3(a2,f5(a1,a2))),
% 0.90/1.05 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,9,16])).
% 0.90/1.05 cnf(215,plain,
% 0.90/1.05 ($false),
% 0.90/1.05 inference(scs_inference,[],[116,6,214,12]),
% 0.90/1.05 ['proof']).
% 0.90/1.05 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.90/1.05 % Total time :0.510000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------