%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : GEO183+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:20:10 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.45s 1.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 42 ( 13 unt; 1 def)
% Number of atoms : 112 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 107 ( 42 ~; 42 |; 18 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 60 ( 0 sgn 52 !; 8 ?; 15 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0] : ~ distinct_points(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',apart1) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X0,X1)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
=> ( distinct_points(X2,X1)
& distinct_points(X2,X0) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',con1) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',ceq2) ).
fof(f13,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( ~ distinct_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
& convergent_lines(X2,X3)
& distinct_points(X0,X1) )
=> ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(f14,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( ~ distinct_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
& convergent_lines(X2,X3)
& distinct_points(X0,X1) )
=> ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f13]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
| ( distinct_points(X2,X1)
& distinct_points(X2,X0) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
| ( distinct_points(X2,X1)
& distinct_points(X2,X0) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f21]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f30,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f29]) ).
fof(f32,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
& convergent_lines(X2,X3)
& distinct_points(X0,X1)
& ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
fof(f33,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
& convergent_lines(X2,X3)
& distinct_points(X0,X1)
& ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f32]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
( ~ distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
& convergent_lines(sK2,sK3)
& distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
& ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
| apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3)],[f33]) ).
fof(f35,plain,
! [X0] : ~ distinct_points(X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f41,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
| distinct_points(X2,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
fof(f42,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
| distinct_points(X2,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
fof(f47,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).
fof(f49,plain,
~ distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f51,plain,
distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f52,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
| apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
tcf(c_49,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ~ distinct_points(X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).
tcf(c_55,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( distinct_points(X0,X1)
| ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).
tcf(c_56,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( distinct_points(X0,X2)
| ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).
tcf(c_61,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).
tcf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
| apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).
tcf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).
tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).
tcf(c_156,definition,
iPr_def_10 = line_connecting(sK0,sK1),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_157,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_lines(sK2,iPr_def_10),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_156]) ).
tcf(c_159,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).
tcf(c_160,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
| apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63]) ).
tcf(c_681,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( apart_point_and_line(sK0,X0)
| distinct_lines(sK2,X0)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).
tcf(c_731,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( distinct_points(X0,sK0)
| ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).
tcf(c_743,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2)
| apart_point_and_line(sK1,X0)
| distinct_lines(sK2,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_61]) ).
tcf(c_768,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( distinct_points(X0,sK1)
| ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,iPr_def_10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_156,c_56]) ).
tcf(c_769,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( distinct_points(X0,sK1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,iPr_def_10) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_768,c_159]) ).
tcf(c_833,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(sK1,iPr_def_10)
| apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_743,c_157]) ).
tcf(c_846,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2)
| distinct_points(sK1,sK1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_833,c_769]) ).
tcf(c_848,plain,
apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_846,c_49]) ).
tcf(c_892,plain,
~ distinct_points(sK0,sK0),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).
tcf(c_1157,plain,
( distinct_points(sK0,sK0)
| ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_731]) ).
tcf(c_1158,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
| distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
| ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_681]) ).
tcf(c_1159,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1158,c_1157,c_892,c_848,c_66,c_64]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : GEO183+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 11:17:52 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.40
% 0.10/0.40 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.40
% 0.10/0.40 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.42 % Proving...
% 0.45/1.28 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.28 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 % ------ iProver source info
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.45/1.28 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.45/1.28 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 % ------ Parsing...
% 0.45/1.28 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.45/1.28 % ------ Proving...
% 0.45/1.28 % ------ Problem Properties
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 %
% 0.45/1.28 % clauses 19
% 0.45/1.28 % conjectures 4
% 0.45/1.28 % EPR 14
% 0.45/1.28 % Horn 12
% 0.45/1.28 % unary 7
% 0.45/1.28 % binary 2
% 0.45/1.28 % lits 44
% 0.45/1.28 % lits eq 1
% 0.45/1.28 % fd_pure 0
% 0.45/1.28 % fd_pseudo 0
% 0.45/1.28 % fd_cond 0
% 0.45/1.28 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 0.45/1.28 % AC symbols 0
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 % ------
% 0.45/1.28 % Current options:
% 0.45/1.28 % ------
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 %
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 % ------ Proving...
% 0.45/1.28 %
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.45/1.28
% 0.45/1.28
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------