%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : GEO183+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:19:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.29s 1.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 79 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 76 ( 31 ~; 23 |; 11 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 0 sgn 38 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& equal_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> ( incident_point_and_line(X1,X4)
& incident_point_and_line(X2,X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(a4,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
<=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).
fof(ax2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( equal_lines(X1,X2)
<=> ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',ax2) ).
fof(ceq2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).
fof(ci1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).
fof(ci2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& equal_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> ( incident_point_and_line(X1,X4)
& incident_point_and_line(X2,X4) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
<=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a4]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk4_0)
& equal_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
& ( ~ incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X173,X174] :
( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X173,X174)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X173,X174) )
& ( apart_point_and_line(X173,X174)
| incident_point_and_line(X173,X174) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( equal_lines(X1,X2)
<=> ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| incident_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X169,X170] :
( ( ~ equal_lines(X169,X170)
| ~ distinct_lines(X169,X170) )
& ( distinct_lines(X169,X170)
| equal_lines(X169,X170) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X123,X124,X125] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X123,X124)
| distinct_lines(X124,X125)
| apart_point_and_line(X123,X125) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci1]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ equal_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
equal_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X108,X109] :
( ~ distinct_points(X108,X109)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X108,line_connecting(X108,X109)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci2]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X110,X111] :
( ~ distinct_points(X110,X111)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X111,line_connecting(X110,X111)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO183+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 4 17:48:53 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.29/1.72 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.29/1.72 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.72 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.72 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.29/1.72 % Total time : 1.368s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------