↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO183+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:23:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.38s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (   9 unt;   5 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   29 (   0 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    distinct_points(skc7,skc6),
    file('GEO183+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    equal_lines(skc4,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
    file('GEO183+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    ( incident_point_and_line(u,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(u,v) ),
    file('GEO183+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(skc6,skc4)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(skc7,skc4) ),
    file('GEO183+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(25,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | ~ equal_lines(u,v) ),
    file('GEO183+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(32,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
    file('GEO183+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(33,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
    file('GEO183+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(37,axiom,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(v,w)
    | apart_point_and_line(u,w) ),
    file('GEO183+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(63,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc7,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,32]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,32.0')] ).

cnf(64,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc6,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,33]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,33.0')] ).

cnf(66,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(skc4,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,25]),
    [iquote('0:Res:6.0,25.0')] ).

cnf(271,plain,
    ( incident_point_and_line(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(v,w)
    | apart_point_and_line(u,w) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[18,37]),
    [iquote('0:Res:18.1,37.0')] ).

cnf(712,plain,
    ( incident_point_and_line(skc6,u)
    | distinct_lines(u,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[271,64]),
    [iquote('0:Res:271.2,64.0')] ).

cnf(713,plain,
    ( incident_point_and_line(skc7,u)
    | distinct_lines(u,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[271,63]),
    [iquote('0:Res:271.2,63.0')] ).

cnf(950,plain,
    incident_point_and_line(skc6,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[712,66]),
    [iquote('0:Res:712.1,66.0')] ).

cnf(957,plain,
    ~ incident_point_and_line(skc7,skc4),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[23,950]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:23.0,950.0')] ).

cnf(959,plain,
    incident_point_and_line(skc7,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[713,66]),
    [iquote('0:Res:713.1,66.0')] ).

cnf(966,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[959,957]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:959.0,957.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GEO183+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 12:55:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.38/0.55  
% 0.38/0.55  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.38/0.55  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.38/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.38/0.55  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.38/0.55  SPASS derived 901 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 643 clauses.
% 0.38/0.55  SPASS allocated 98189 KBytes.
% 0.38/0.55  SPASS spent	0:00:00.20 on the problem.
% 0.38/0.55  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.38/0.55  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.38/0.55  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.38/0.55  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.38/0.55  		0:00:00.09 for the reduction.
% 0.38/0.55  
% 0.38/0.55  
% 0.38/0.55  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 18 :
% 0.38/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.55  Formulae used in the proof : con a4 ax2 ci1 ci2 ceq2
% 0.38/0.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------