↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GEO183+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:20:10 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.22s 1.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  13 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  118 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  109 (  50   ~;  35   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   69 (   0 sgn  61   !;   8   ?;  13   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
        | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( equal_lines(X0,X1)
    <=> ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',ax2) ).

fof(f34,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X0,X1)
    <=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).

fof(f36,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( equal_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
        & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
        & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
     => ( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
        & incident_point_and_line(X0,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( equal_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
          & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
          & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
       => ( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
          & incident_point_and_line(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f36]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
     => incident_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( equal_lines(X0,X1)
     => ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ equal_lines(X0,X1)
      | ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | incident_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( equal_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
      & distinct_points(X0,X1)
      & ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
        | ~ incident_point_and_line(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( equal_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
      & distinct_points(X0,X1)
      & ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
        | ~ incident_point_and_line(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f80]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ( equal_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
    & convergent_lines(sK2,sK3)
    & distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
    & ( ~ incident_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
      | ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3)],[f81]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ equal_lines(X0,X1)
      | ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | incident_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    equal_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).

fof(f123,plain,
    distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X1,X0)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

tcf(c_85,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ equal_lines(X0,X1)
      | ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f119]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

tcf(c_87,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

tcf(c_88,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f123]) ).

tcf(c_90,negated_conjecture,
    equal_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).

tcf(c_304,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_90]) ).

tcf(c_473,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = line_connecting(sK0,sK1),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_474,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(sK2,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_304,c_473]) ).

tcf(c_476,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_88]) ).

tcf(c_477,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_87]) ).

tcf(c_957,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_477]) ).

tcf(c_968,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_957]) ).

tcf(c_1204,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_473,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_1205,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_10),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1204,c_476]) ).

tcf(c_1210,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(sK1,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_473,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_1211,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sK1,iPr_def_10),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1210,c_476]) ).

tcf(c_1535,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2)
      | apart_point_and_line(sK1,X0)
      | distinct_lines(sK2,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_968,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_1593,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,iPr_def_10)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1535,c_474]) ).

tcf(c_1594,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1593,c_1211]) ).

tcf(c_1595,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,X0)
      | distinct_lines(sK2,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1594,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_1609,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1595,c_474]) ).

tcf(c_1610,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1609,c_1205]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO183+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.38  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 11:18:07 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.45  % Proving...
% 3.22/1.31  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.22/1.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.22/1.31  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.22/1.31  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.22/1.31  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 4 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.22/1.31  % ------ Proving...
% 3.22/1.31  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % 
% 3.22/1.31  % clauses                               34
% 3.22/1.31  % conjectures                           3
% 3.22/1.31  % EPR                                   25
% 3.22/1.31  % Horn                                  17
% 3.22/1.31  % unary                                 11
% 3.22/1.31  % binary                                8
% 3.22/1.31  % lits                                  83
% 3.22/1.31  % lits eq                               1
% 3.22/1.31  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.22/1.31  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.22/1.31  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.22/1.31  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.22/1.31  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % ------ 
% 3.22/1.31  % Current options:
% 3.22/1.31  % ------ 
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % 
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % ------ Proving...
% 3.22/1.31  % 
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.22/1.31  
% 3.22/1.31  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------