↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : GEO184+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr  9 06:14:04 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.81s 1.99s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (  17   ~;  18   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (  22   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(f_146,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,U,V] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
          & convergent_lines(U,V)
          & ~ apart_point_and_line(X,U)
          & ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,U) )
       => ~ distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_111,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,U,V] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
        & distinct_lines(U,V) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(X,V)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,V) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).

tff(f_83,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

tff(f_88,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_146]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_146]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_146]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    distinct_lines('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_146]) ).

tff(c_182,plain,
    ! [Y_70,V_71,U_72,X_73] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_70,V_71)
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_70,U_72)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_73,V_71)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_73,U_72)
      | ~ distinct_lines(U_72,V_71)
      | ~ distinct_points(X_73,Y_70) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_111]) ).

tff(c_257,plain,
    ! [Y_78,X_79] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_78,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_78,'#skF_3')
      | apart_point_and_line(X_79,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | apart_point_and_line(X_79,'#skF_3')
      | ~ distinct_points(X_79,Y_78) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_30,c_182]) ).

tff(c_261,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3')
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_257]) ).

tff(c_267,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_32,c_261]) ).

tff(c_440,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_267]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [X_13,Y_14] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X_13,line_connecting(X_13,Y_14))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_13,Y_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_83]) ).

tff(c_447,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_440,c_14]) ).

tff(c_453,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_38,c_447]) ).

tff(c_454,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_267]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [Y_16,X_15] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(Y_16,line_connecting(X_15,Y_16))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_15,Y_16) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_88]) ).

tff(c_462,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_454,c_16]) ).

tff(c_468,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_38,c_462]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GEO184+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Apr  7 19:55:50 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.81/1.99  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.12/1.99  
% 4.12/1.99  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------