↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO185+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:18 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 25.06s 25.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 25.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : GEO185+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.30  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 10:28:09 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.53  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 25.06/25.17  %-------------------------------------------
% 25.06/25.17  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 25.06/25.17  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 25.06/25.17  % Transform   :cnf
% 25.06/25.17  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 25.06/25.17  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 25.06/25.17  
% 25.06/25.17  % Result      :Theorem 24.590000s
% 25.06/25.17  % Output      :CNFRefutation 24.590000s
% 25.06/25.17  %-------------------------------------------
% 25.06/25.17  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 25.06/25.17  % File     : GEO185+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 25.06/25.17  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 25.06/25.17  % Problem  : Lemma on symmetry and apartness
% 25.06/25.17  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms.
% 25.06/25.17  % English  : If the lines U and V are convergent, then the point that is
% 25.06/25.17  %            equal to the intersection point is incident to both lines.
% 25.06/25.17  
% 25.06/25.17  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 25.06/25.17  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 25.06/25.18  %          : [Rat07] Raths (2007), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 25.06/25.18  % Source   : [Rat07]
% 25.06/25.18  % Names    : Lemma 4.5.ii [vPl95]
% 25.06/25.18  
% 25.06/25.18  % Status   : Theorem
% 25.06/25.18  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.13 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.21 v5.0.0, 0.10 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.0
% 25.06/25.18  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (   7 unt;   0 def)
% 25.06/25.18  %            Number of atoms       :   98 (   0 equ)
% 25.06/25.18  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 25.06/25.18  %            Number of connectives :   90 (  28   ~;  19   |;  16   &)
% 25.06/25.18  %                                         (   5 <=>;  22  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 25.06/25.18  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 25.06/25.18  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 25.06/25.18  %            Number of predicates  :   12 (  12 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 25.06/25.18  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 25.06/25.18  %            Number of variables   :   85 (  85   !;   0   ?)
% 25.06/25.18  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 25.06/25.18  
% 25.06/25.18  % Comments :
% 25.06/25.18  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 25.06/25.18  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 25.06/25.18  include('Axioms/GEO006+1.ax').
% 25.06/25.18  include('Axioms/GEO006+2.ax').
% 25.06/25.18  include('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax').
% 25.06/25.18  include('Axioms/GEO006+4.ax').
% 25.06/25.18  include('Axioms/GEO006+5.ax').
% 25.06/25.18  include('Axioms/GEO006+6.ax').
% 25.06/25.18  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 25.06/25.18  fof(con,conjecture,
% 25.06/25.18      ! [X,Y,U,V] :
% 25.06/25.18        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 25.06/25.18          & convergent_lines(U,V)
% 25.06/25.18          & equal_points(X,intersection_point(U,V)) )
% 25.06/25.18       => ( incident_point_and_line(X,U)
% 25.06/25.18          & incident_point_and_line(X,V) ) ) ).
% 25.06/25.18  
% 25.06/25.18  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 25.06/25.18  %-------------------------------------------
% 25.06/25.18  % Proof found
% 25.06/25.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 25.06/25.18  % SZS output start Proof
% 25.06/25.18  %ClaNum:50(EqnAxiom:0)
% 25.06/25.18  %VarNum:218(SingletonVarNum:98)
% 25.06/25.18  %MaxLitNum:6
% 25.06/25.18  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 25.06/25.18  %SharedTerms:10
% 25.06/25.18  %goalClause: 1 2 3 18
% 25.06/25.18  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 25.06/25.18  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 25.06/25.18  [2]P2(a3,a4)
% 25.06/25.18  [3]P5(a1,f5(a3,a4))
% 25.06/25.18  [4]~P1(x41,x41)
% 25.06/25.18  [5]~P4(x51,x51)
% 25.06/25.18  [6]~P2(x61,x61)
% 25.06/25.18  [7]~P3(x71,f6(x72,x71))
% 25.06/25.18  [8]~P3(x81,f7(x82,x81))
% 25.06/25.18  [9]~P2(f6(x91,x92),x91)
% 25.06/25.18  [10]~P7(f7(x101,x102),x101)
% 25.06/25.18  [18]~P9(a1,a3)+~P9(a1,a4)
% 25.06/25.18  [11]P5(x111,x112)+P1(x111,x112)
% 25.06/25.18  [12]P6(x121,x122)+P4(x121,x122)
% 25.06/25.18  [14]P7(x141,x142)+P2(x141,x142)
% 25.06/25.18  [15]P8(x151,x152)+P2(x151,x152)
% 25.06/25.18  [16]P9(x161,x162)+P3(x161,x162)
% 25.06/25.18  [17]P10(x171,x172)+P7(x171,x172)
% 25.06/25.18  [19]~P4(x191,x192)+P2(x191,x192)
% 25.06/25.18  [22]~P5(x221,x222)+~P1(x221,x222)
% 25.06/25.18  [23]~P6(x231,x232)+~P4(x231,x232)
% 25.06/25.18  [24]~P8(x241,x242)+~P2(x241,x242)
% 25.06/25.18  [25]~P9(x251,x252)+~P3(x251,x252)
% 25.06/25.18  [26]~P10(x261,x262)+~P7(x261,x262)
% 25.06/25.18  [46]~P1(x461,x462)+~P3(x462,f8(x461,x462))
% 25.06/25.18  [47]~P1(x471,x472)+~P3(x471,f8(x471,x472))
% 25.06/25.18  [48]~P2(x481,x482)+~P3(f5(x481,x482),x482)
% 25.06/25.18  [49]~P2(x491,x492)+~P3(f5(x491,x492),x491)
% 25.06/25.18  [20]~P12(x202)+~P11(x201)+P11(f6(x201,x202))
% 25.06/25.18  [21]~P12(x212)+~P11(x211)+P11(f7(x211,x212))
% 25.06/25.18  [27]~P1(x273,x271)+P1(x271,x272)+P1(x273,x272)
% 25.06/25.18  [28]~P3(x281,x283)+P1(x281,x282)+P3(x282,x283)
% 25.06/25.18  [29]~P4(x293,x291)+P4(x291,x292)+P4(x293,x292)
% 25.06/25.18  [30]~P2(x303,x301)+P4(x301,x302)+P2(x303,x302)
% 25.06/25.18  [31]~P3(x313,x311)+P4(x311,x312)+P3(x313,x312)
% 25.06/25.18  [32]~P2(x323,x321)+P2(x321,x322)+P2(x323,x322)
% 25.06/25.18  [33]~P2(x333,x332)+P7(x331,x332)+P7(x331,x333)
% 25.06/25.18  [35]~P11(x352)+~P11(x351)+~P2(x351,x352)+P12(f5(x351,x352))
% 25.06/25.18  [36]~P12(x362)+~P12(x361)+~P1(x361,x362)+P11(f8(x361,x362))
% 25.06/25.18  [38]~P2(x381,x383)+~P7(x381,x383)+P2(x381,x382)+P7(x383,x382)
% 25.06/25.18  [39]~P2(x392,x393)+~P7(x392,x393)+P2(x391,x392)+P2(x391,x393)
% 25.06/25.18  [40]~P2(x402,x403)+~P7(x402,x403)+P2(x401,x402)+P7(x401,x403)
% 25.06/25.18  [41]~P2(x413,x411)+~P7(x413,x411)+P2(x411,x412)+P7(x413,x412)
% 25.06/25.18  [42]~P2(x423,x422)+~P7(x423,x422)+P2(x421,x422)+P7(x421,x423)
% 25.06/25.18  [43]~P2(x431,x433)+~P7(x431,x433)+P7(x431,x432)+P7(x433,x432)
% 25.06/25.18  [45]P7(x453,x454)+~P4(x453,x452)+P3(x451,x452)+P3(x451,x453)+P7(x452,x454)
% 25.06/25.18  [50]P3(x504,x503)+~P1(x504,x501)+~P4(x503,x502)+P3(x501,x502)+P3(x501,x503)+P3(x504,x502)
% 25.06/25.18  %EqnAxiom
% 25.06/25.18  
% 25.06/25.18  %-------------------------------------------
% 25.17/25.20  cnf(67,plain,
% 25.17/25.20     (~P4(f6(x671,x672),x671)),
% 25.17/25.20     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10,22,24,11,12,14,15,16,17,19])).
% 25.17/25.20  cnf(238,plain,
% 25.17/25.20     (P3(a1,a3)+~P9(a1,a4)),
% 25.17/25.20     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,16])).
% 25.17/25.20  cnf(389,plain,
% 25.17/25.20     (P4(a3,f6(x3891,a1))+~P9(a1,a4)),
% 25.17/25.20     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,238,31])).
% 25.17/25.20  cnf(639,plain,
% 25.17/25.20     (~P3(f5(f7(x6391,x6392),x6391),x6391)),
% 25.17/25.20     inference(scs_inference,[],[10,48,14])).
% 25.17/25.20  cnf(892,plain,
% 25.17/25.20     (~P9(a1,a4)),
% 25.17/25.20     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,67,389,29])).
% 25.17/25.20  cnf(5426,plain,
% 25.17/25.20     (~P2(x54261,f6(x54261,x54262))),
% 25.17/25.20     inference(scs_inference,[],[67,639,6,31,30])).
% 25.17/25.20  cnf(5456,plain,
% 25.17/25.20     (~P4(x54561,f6(x54561,x54562))),
% 25.17/25.20     inference(scs_inference,[],[5426,19])).
% 25.17/25.20  cnf(8954,plain,
% 25.17/25.20     (P3(a1,a4)),
% 25.17/25.20     inference(scs_inference,[],[892,16])).
% 25.17/25.20  cnf(8993,plain,
% 25.17/25.20     ($false),
% 25.17/25.20     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,5456,8954,31]),
% 25.17/25.20     ['proof']).
% 25.17/25.21  % SZS output end Proof
% 25.17/25.21  % Total time :24.590000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------