↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : GEO185+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:17:20 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  27   ~;  13   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   0 sgn  19   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ci3,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),X) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ci3) ).

fof(ci4,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ci4) ).

fof(ceq1,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X,Y)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(Z,Y)
        | distinct_points(X,Z) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ceq1) ).

fof(ax1,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( equal_points(X,Y)
    <=> ~ distinct_points(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax1) ).

fof(a4,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X,Y)
    <=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a4) ).

fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X,Y,U,V] :
      ( ( equal_points(X,intersection_point(U,V))
        & convergent_lines(U,V)
        & distinct_points(X,Y) )
     => ( incident_point_and_line(X,V)
        & incident_point_and_line(X,U) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(con_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,U,V] :
        ( ( equal_points(X,intersection_point(U,V))
          & convergent_lines(U,V)
          & distinct_points(X,Y) )
       => ( incident_point_and_line(X,V)
          & incident_point_and_line(X,U) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(A,B)
    | ~ equal_points(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax1]) ).

fof(nnf_36,plain,
    ? [X,Y,U,V] :
      ( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X,V)
        | ~ incident_point_and_line(X,U) )
      & equal_points(X,intersection_point(U,V))
      & convergent_lines(U,V)
      & distinct_points(X,Y) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[con_neg]) ).

fof(sk_con_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,sK2)
      | ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,sK1) )
    & equal_points(sK0,intersection_point(sK1,sK2))
    & convergent_lines(sK1,sK2)
    & distinct_points(sK0,sK3) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK3,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X,sK0),skolemize(Y,sK3),skolemize(U,sK1),skolemize(V,sK2)],[nnf_36]) ).

cnf(c_39,negated_conjecture,
    equal_points(sK0,intersection_point(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_con_neg]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(A,B),A)
    | ~ convergent_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ci3]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(A,B),B)
    | ~ convergent_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ci4]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(C,B)
    | distinct_points(A,C)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ceq1]) ).

cnf(c_80,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(A,B)
    | incident_point_and_line(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a4]) ).

cnf(c_82,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(sK1,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_con_neg]) ).

cnf(c_83,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,sK2)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_con_neg]) ).

cnf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
    ~ distinct_points(sK0,intersection_point(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_38]) ).

cnf(c_98,negated_conjecture,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK1,sK2),sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_82]) ).

cnf(c_99,negated_conjecture,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK1,sK2),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_82]) ).

cnf(c_100,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_80]) ).

cnf(c_145,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK1,sK2),A)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_84]) ).

cnf(c_113,negated_conjecture,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_145,c_98]) ).

cnf(c_114,plain,
    ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_100]) ).

cnf(c_142,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_80]) ).

cnf(c_146,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK1,sK2),A)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_84]) ).

cnf(c_147,negated_conjecture,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_146,c_99]) ).

cnf(c_144,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_142,c_147]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GEO185+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 13:02:35 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.35  % Process 2157490 was started by sandbox on n012,
% 0.08/0.35  % Fri Sep 25 13:02:35 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.12/0.37  % Length of proof is 22.
% 0.12/0.37  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.12/0.37  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.12/0.37  % Given clauses 51.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------