↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO188+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:19 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 1.02s 1.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO188+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 09:22:09 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.52/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 1.02/1.10  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.02/1.10  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 1.02/1.10  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 1.02/1.10  % Transform   :cnf
% 1.02/1.10  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 1.02/1.10  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 1.02/1.10  
% 1.02/1.10  % Result      :Theorem 0.490000s
% 1.02/1.10  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.490000s
% 1.02/1.10  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.02/1.10  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.02/1.10  % File     : GEO188+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 1.02/1.10  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 1.02/1.10  % Problem  : Collary to symmetry of incidence
% 1.02/1.10  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 1.02/1.10  % English  : If X, Y, and Z are pairwise distinct, and Z is incident with
% 1.02/1.10  %            the line connecting X and Y, then X is incident with the line
% 1.02/1.10  %            connecting Z and Y.
% 1.02/1.10  
% 1.02/1.10  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 1.02/1.10  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 1.02/1.10  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 1.02/1.10  % Names    : Corollary 4.7.i [vPl95]
% 1.02/1.10  
% 1.02/1.10  % Status   : Theorem
% 1.02/1.10  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.29 v5.0.0, 0.15 v4.1.0, 0.17 v4.0.1, 0.26 v4.0.0, 0.25 v3.7.0, 0.29 v3.5.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 1.02/1.10  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 1.02/1.10  %            Number of atoms       :   40 (   0 equ)
% 1.02/1.10  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 1.02/1.10  %            Number of connectives :   34 (   9   ~;   9   |;   4   &)
% 1.02/1.10  %                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 1.02/1.10  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 1.02/1.10  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 1.02/1.10  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 1.02/1.10  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 1.02/1.10  %            Number of variables   :   36 (  36   !;   0   ?)
% 1.02/1.10  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 1.02/1.10  
% 1.02/1.10  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 1.02/1.10  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.02/1.10  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 1.02/1.10  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.02/1.10  fof(con,conjecture,
% 1.02/1.10      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 1.02/1.10        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 1.02/1.10          & distinct_points(X,Z)
% 1.02/1.10          & distinct_points(Y,Z)
% 1.02/1.10          & ~ apart_point_and_line(Z,line_connecting(X,Y)) )
% 1.02/1.10       => ~ apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(Z,Y)) ) ).
% 1.02/1.10  
% 1.02/1.10  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.02/1.10  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.02/1.10  % Proof found
% 1.02/1.10  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.02/1.10  % SZS output start Proof
% 1.02/1.10  %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:0)
% 1.02/1.10  %VarNum:74(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 1.02/1.10  %MaxLitNum:6
% 1.02/1.10  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 1.02/1.10  %SharedTerms:10
% 1.02/1.10  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 8
% 1.02/1.10  %singleGoalClaCount:5
% 1.02/1.10  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 1.02/1.10  [2]P1(a1,a3)
% 1.02/1.10  [3]P1(a2,a3)
% 1.02/1.10  [4]P2(a1,f4(a3,a2))
% 1.02/1.10  [8]~P2(a3,f4(a1,a2))
% 1.02/1.10  [5]~P1(x51,x51)
% 1.02/1.10  [6]~P3(x61,x61)
% 1.02/1.10  [7]~P4(x71,x71)
% 1.02/1.10  [15]~P1(x151,x152)+~P2(x152,f4(x151,x152))
% 1.02/1.10  [16]~P1(x161,x162)+~P2(x161,f4(x161,x162))
% 1.02/1.10  [17]~P4(x171,x172)+~P2(f5(x171,x172),x172)
% 1.02/1.10  [18]~P4(x181,x182)+~P2(f5(x181,x182),x181)
% 1.02/1.10  [9]~P1(x93,x91)+P1(x91,x92)+P1(x93,x92)
% 1.02/1.10  [10]~P2(x101,x103)+P1(x101,x102)+P2(x102,x103)
% 1.02/1.10  [11]~P3(x113,x111)+P3(x111,x112)+P3(x113,x112)
% 1.02/1.10  [12]~P4(x123,x121)+P3(x121,x122)+P4(x123,x122)
% 1.02/1.10  [13]~P2(x133,x131)+P3(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x132)
% 1.02/1.10  [14]~P4(x143,x141)+P4(x141,x142)+P4(x143,x142)
% 1.02/1.10  [19]P2(x194,x193)+~P1(x194,x191)+~P3(x193,x192)+P2(x191,x192)+P2(x191,x193)+P2(x194,x192)
% 1.02/1.10  %EqnAxiom
% 1.02/1.10  
% 1.02/1.10  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.02/1.11  cnf(38,plain,
% 1.02/1.11     (~P2(a2,f4(a1,a2))),
% 1.02/1.11     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,15,10])).
% 1.02/1.11  cnf(43,plain,
% 1.02/1.11     (~P2(a2,f4(a3,a2))),
% 1.02/1.11     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,3,15,9])).
% 1.02/1.11  cnf(49,plain,
% 1.02/1.11     (~P2(a3,f4(a3,a2))),
% 1.02/1.11     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,3,16,9])).
% 1.02/1.11  cnf(50,plain,
% 1.02/1.11     (P3(f4(a3,a2),f4(a1,a2))),
% 1.02/1.11     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,16,13])).
% 1.02/1.11  cnf(87,plain,
% 1.02/1.11     ($false),
% 1.02/1.11     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,8,49,43,50,38,19]),
% 1.02/1.11     ['proof']).
% 1.02/1.11  % SZS output end Proof
% 1.02/1.11  % Total time :0.490000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------