%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : GEO188+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:19:47 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.29s 1.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 74 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 63 ( 25 ~; 20 |; 11 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 64 ( 3 sgn 43 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& distinct_points(X1,X3)
& distinct_points(X2,X3)
& incident_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> incident_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X3,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(a4,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
<=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).
fof(ceq2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).
fof(apart2,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart2) ).
fof(apart5,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X1,X3)
| distinct_lines(X2,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart5) ).
fof(cp1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp1) ).
fof(p1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
=> convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+1.ax',p1) ).
fof(cp2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp2) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& distinct_points(X1,X3)
& distinct_points(X2,X3)
& incident_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> incident_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X3,X2)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
<=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a4]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& distinct_points(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& distinct_points(esk2_0,esk3_0)
& incident_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
& ~ incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X172,X173] :
( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X172,X173)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X172,X173) )
& ( apart_point_and_line(X172,X173)
| incident_point_and_line(X172,X173) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X122,X123,X124] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X122,X123)
| distinct_lines(X123,X124)
| apart_point_and_line(X122,X124) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| incident_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart2]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X101,X102,X103] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X101,X102)
| distinct_lines(X101,X103)
| distinct_lines(X102,X103) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[apart5])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X96] : ~ distinct_lines(X96,X96),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( distinct_lines(X1,X3)
| distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X1,X2] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cp1]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X128,X129] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X128,X129)
| convergent_lines(X128,X129) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0),X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X1,X2] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cp2]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X130,X131] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X131,X130),X131),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(X1,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
fof(c_0_30,plain,
! [X132,X133] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X132,parallel_through_point(X133,X132)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X2),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| convergent_lines(X1,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,parallel_through_point(line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0),X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO188+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.32 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 4 17:46:36 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.29/1.72 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.29/1.72 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.72 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.72 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.29/1.73 % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------