%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : GEO188+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:20:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.34s 6.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 45 ( 14 unt; 1 def)
% Number of atoms : 111 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 89 ( 29 ~; 35 |; 19 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 87 ( 0 sgn 81 !; 6 ?; 29 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0] : ~ distinct_lines(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart2) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( distinct_lines(X0,X1)
=> ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X0,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart5) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).
fof(f15,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( distinct_lines(X0,X1)
=> convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+1.ax',p1) ).
fof(f16,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X0),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp1) ).
fof(f17,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,parallel_through_point(X1,X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp2) ).
fof(f34,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( incident_point_and_line(X0,X1)
<=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).
fof(f36,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( incident_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
& distinct_points(X1,X2)
& distinct_points(X0,X2)
& distinct_points(X0,X1) )
=> incident_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(f37,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( incident_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
& distinct_points(X1,X2)
& distinct_points(X0,X2)
& distinct_points(X0,X1) )
=> incident_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X2,X1)) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f36]) ).
fof(f40,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X0,X2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f41,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X0,X2) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f40]) ).
fof(f52,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f53,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f52]) ).
fof(f56,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1)
| convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f76,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( incident_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
& distinct_points(X1,X2)
& distinct_points(X0,X2)
& distinct_points(X0,X1)
& ~ incident_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X2,X1)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).
fof(f77,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( incident_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
& distinct_points(X1,X2)
& distinct_points(X0,X2)
& distinct_points(X0,X1)
& ~ incident_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X2,X1)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f76]) ).
fof(f78,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X0,X1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) )
& ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
| incident_point_and_line(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f79,plain,
( incident_point_and_line(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
& distinct_points(sK1,sK2)
& distinct_points(sK0,sK2)
& distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
& ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK2,sK1)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f77]) ).
fof(f81,plain,
! [X0] : ~ distinct_lines(X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f84,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).
fof(f92,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f94,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1)
| convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).
fof(f95,plain,
! [X0,X1] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X0),X1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).
fof(f96,plain,
! [X0,X1] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,parallel_through_point(X1,X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f117,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
| incident_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).
fof(f122,plain,
~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK2,sK1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).
tcf(c_50,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ~ distinct_lines(X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f81]) ).
tcf(c_53,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X0,X2)
| ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).
tcf(c_61,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).
tcf(c_63,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( convergent_lines(X0,X1)
| ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).
tcf(c_64,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X0,X1),X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
tcf(c_65,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,parallel_through_point(X1,X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f96]) ).
tcf(c_85,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( incident_point_and_line(X0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).
tcf(c_87,negated_conjecture,
~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK2,sK1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).
tcf(c_112,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
| incident_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_85]) ).
tcf(c_113,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( incident_point_and_line(X0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_112]) ).
tcf(c_197,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( incident_point_and_line(X2,X0)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
| distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
inference(bin_hyper_res,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_113]) ).
tcf(c_431,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( apart_point_and_line(sK0,X0)
| distinct_lines(line_connecting(sK2,sK1),X0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_197]) ).
tcf(c_619,definition,
iPr_def_10 = line_connecting(sK2,sK1),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_621,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( apart_point_and_line(sK0,X0)
| distinct_lines(iPr_def_10,X0) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_431,c_619]) ).
tcf(c_1168,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( apart_point_and_line(sK0,X0)
| distinct_lines(iPr_def_10,X1)
| distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_621,c_53]) ).
tcf(c_1486,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( apart_point_and_line(sK0,X0)
| distinct_lines(X0,iPr_def_10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1168,c_50]) ).
tcf(c_2140,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( apart_point_and_line(sK0,X0)
| convergent_lines(X0,iPr_def_10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1486,c_63]) ).
tcf(c_2921,plain,
! [X0: $i] : convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X0,sK0),iPr_def_10),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2140,c_65]) ).
tcf(c_2976,plain,
$false,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2921,c_64]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : GEO188+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/5.38 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.08/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/5.38 % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 11:21:42 UTC 2026
% 0.08/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/5.38 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.43
% 0.15/5.43 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.43
% 0.15/5.43 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.44 % Proving...
% 3.34/6.29 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/6.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 % ------ iProver source info
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.34/6.29 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.34/6.29 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 % ------ Parsing...
% 3.34/6.29 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 4 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.34/6.29 % ------ Proving...
% 3.34/6.29 % ------ Problem Properties
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 %
% 3.34/6.29 % clauses 37
% 3.34/6.29 % conjectures 3
% 3.34/6.29 % EPR 27
% 3.34/6.29 % Horn 19
% 3.34/6.29 % unary 14
% 3.34/6.29 % binary 8
% 3.34/6.29 % lits 86
% 3.34/6.29 % lits eq 2
% 3.34/6.29 % fd_pure 0
% 3.34/6.29 % fd_pseudo 0
% 3.34/6.29 % fd_cond 0
% 3.34/6.29 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 3.34/6.29 % AC symbols 0
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 % ------
% 3.34/6.29 % Current options:
% 3.34/6.29 % ------
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 %
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 % ------ Proving...
% 3.34/6.29 %
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.34/6.29
% 3.34/6.29
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------