↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO189+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:23:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.70s 0.90s
% Output   : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO189+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 08:36:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.70/0.90  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.70/0.90  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.70/0.90  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.70/0.90  SPASS derived 2354 clauses, backtracked 259 clauses, performed 7 splits and kept 876 clauses.
% 0.70/0.90  SPASS allocated 86784 KBytes.
% 0.70/0.90  SPASS spent	0:00:00.55 on the problem.
% 0.70/0.90  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.70/0.90  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.70/0.90  		0:00:00.05 for inferences.
% 0.70/0.90  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.70/0.90  		0:00:00.41 for the reduction.
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  Here is a proof with depth 7, length 77 :
% 0.70/0.90  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/0.90  1[0:Inp] ||  -> distinct_points(skc5,skc3)*.
% 0.70/0.90  2[0:Inp] ||  -> distinct_points(skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.70/0.90  3[0:Inp] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,skc4)*.
% 0.70/0.90  4[0:Inp] || distinct_points(u,u)* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  5[0:Inp] || distinct_lines(u,u)* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  7[0:Inp] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))*.
% 0.70/0.90  8[0:Inp] || apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  10[0:Inp] || distinct_points(u,v)*+ -> distinct_points(v,w)* distinct_points(u,w)*.
% 0.70/0.90  11[0:Inp] || distinct_lines(u,v)*+ -> distinct_lines(v,w)* distinct_lines(u,w)*.
% 0.70/0.90  13[0:Inp] || apart_point_and_line(u,v)*+ -> apart_point_and_line(w,v)* distinct_points(u,w)*.
% 0.70/0.90  14[0:Inp] || apart_point_and_line(u,v)*+ -> distinct_lines(v,w)* apart_point_and_line(u,w)*.
% 0.70/0.90  15[0:Inp] || distinct_points(u,v) apart_point_and_line(w,line_connecting(u,v))* -> distinct_points(w,u).
% 0.70/0.90  16[0:Inp] || distinct_points(u,v) apart_point_and_line(w,line_connecting(u,v))* -> distinct_points(w,v).
% 0.70/0.90  19[0:Inp] || distinct_lines(u,v)*+ distinct_points(w,x)* -> apart_point_and_line(x,u)* apart_point_and_line(x,v)* apart_point_and_line(w,v)* apart_point_and_line(w,u)*.
% 0.70/0.90  22[0:Res:3.0,15.1] || apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))* -> distinct_points(u,skc3).
% 0.70/0.90  24[0:Res:2.0,19.0] || distinct_lines(u,v)* -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc4,v) apart_point_and_line(skc5,v) apart_point_and_line(skc5,u).
% 0.70/0.90  25[0:Res:2.0,10.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc4,u)* distinct_points(skc5,u).
% 0.70/0.90  26[0:Res:2.0,15.1] || apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))* -> distinct_points(u,skc5).
% 0.70/0.90  28[0:Res:1.0,19.0] || distinct_lines(u,v)* -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,u) apart_point_and_line(skc3,v) apart_point_and_line(skc5,v) apart_point_and_line(skc5,u).
% 0.70/0.90  29[0:Res:1.0,10.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,u)* distinct_points(skc5,u).
% 0.70/0.90  31[0:Res:1.0,16.1] || apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))* -> distinct_points(u,skc3).
% 0.70/0.90  34[0:Res:7.0,13.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))* distinct_points(skc3,u).
% 0.70/0.90  35[0:Res:7.0,14.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,u) distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),u)*.
% 0.70/0.90  39[0:Res:14.1,8.0] || apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) -> distinct_lines(u,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))*.
% 0.70/0.90  53[0:Res:35.1,11.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,u) distinct_lines(u,v)* distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),v)*.
% 0.70/0.90  66[0:Res:25.0,10.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc5,u)* distinct_points(u,v)* distinct_points(skc4,v)*.
% 0.70/0.90  68[0:Res:34.0,26.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,u)* distinct_points(u,skc5)*.
% 0.70/0.90  70[0:Res:68.0,10.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc5)* distinct_points(u,v)* distinct_points(skc3,v)*.
% 0.70/0.90  73[0:Res:34.0,13.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,u)* apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))* distinct_points(u,v)*.
% 0.70/0.90  101[0:Res:34.0,14.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,u) distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),v)* apart_point_and_line(u,v)*.
% 0.70/0.90  118[0:Res:66.2,4.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc5,u)* distinct_points(u,skc4)*.
% 0.70/0.90  122[0:Res:118.0,10.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc4)* distinct_points(u,v)* distinct_points(skc5,v)*.
% 0.70/0.90  131[0:Res:70.2,4.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc5) distinct_points(u,skc3)*.
% 0.70/0.90  178[0:Res:122.2,4.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc4)* distinct_points(u,skc5).
% 0.70/0.90  236[0:Res:73.2,10.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,u)* apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))* distinct_points(v,w)* distinct_points(u,w)*.
% 0.70/0.90  253[0:Res:39.1,28.0] || apart_point_and_line(skc4,u)+ -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)* apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))* apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)) apart_point_and_line(skc5,u).
% 0.70/0.90  270[0:Res:101.2,31.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,u)* distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),line_connecting(skc5,skc3))* distinct_points(u,skc3)*.
% 0.70/0.90  272[0:Res:101.2,22.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,u)* distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),line_connecting(skc3,skc4))* distinct_points(u,skc3)*.
% 0.70/0.90  309[0:Res:53.1,24.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)* distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),v)* apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc4,v) apart_point_and_line(skc5,v) apart_point_and_line(skc5,u).
% 0.70/0.90  862[1:Spt:270.0,270.2] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,u)* distinct_points(u,skc3)*.
% 0.70/0.90  863[1:Fac:862.0,862.1] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,skc3)*.
% 0.70/0.90  866[1:MRR:863.0,4.0] ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.90  868[1:Spt:866.0,270.1] ||  -> distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),line_connecting(skc5,skc3))*.
% 0.70/0.90  1034[2:Spt:272.0,272.2] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,u)* distinct_points(u,skc3)*.
% 0.70/0.90  1035[2:Fac:1034.0,1034.1] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,skc3)*.
% 0.70/0.90  1038[2:MRR:1035.0,4.0] ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.90  1040[2:Spt:1038.0,272.1] ||  -> distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),line_connecting(skc3,skc4))*.
% 0.70/0.90  1107[3:Spt:253.0,253.1,253.4] || apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)* apart_point_and_line(skc5,u).
% 0.70/0.90  1109[3:MRR:309.2,1107.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)* distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),v)* apart_point_and_line(skc4,v) apart_point_and_line(skc5,v) apart_point_and_line(skc5,u).
% 0.70/0.90  2183[0:Res:236.3,4.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,u)* apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))* distinct_points(v,u)*.
% 0.70/0.90  2192[0:Res:2183.0,10.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))* distinct_points(u,v)* distinct_points(v,w)* distinct_points(skc3,w)*.
% 0.70/0.90  2433[0:Fac:2192.2,2192.3] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))* distinct_points(u,skc3) distinct_points(skc3,v)*.
% 0.70/0.90  2460[4:Spt:2433.2] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,u)*.
% 0.70/0.90  2461[4:UnC:2460.0,4.0] ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.90  2462[4:Spt:2461.0,2433.0,2433.1] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))* distinct_points(u,skc3).
% 0.70/0.90  2753[5:Spt:1109.1,1109.2,1109.3] ||  -> distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),u)* apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc5,u).
% 0.70/0.90  2754[5:Res:2753.0,5.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))* apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)).
% 0.70/0.90  2766[6:Spt:2754.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))*.
% 0.70/0.90  2770[6:Res:2766.0,16.1] || distinct_points(skc5,skc4) -> distinct_points(skc4,skc4)*.
% 0.70/0.90  2777[6:MRR:2770.0,2770.1,118.0,4.0] ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.90  2778[6:Spt:2777.0,2754.0,2766.0] || apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  2779[6:Spt:2777.0,2754.1] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))*.
% 0.70/0.90  2799[6:Res:2779.0,15.1] || distinct_points(skc5,skc4)* -> distinct_points(skc5,skc5).
% 0.70/0.90  2804[6:MRR:2799.0,2799.1,178.0,4.0] ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.90  2805[5:Spt:2804.0,1109.0,1109.4] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)* apart_point_and_line(skc5,u).
% 0.70/0.90  2809[5:Res:2805.0,31.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))* distinct_points(skc3,skc3).
% 0.70/0.90  2817[5:MRR:2809.1,4.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))*.
% 0.70/0.90  2822[5:Res:2817.0,15.1] || distinct_points(skc5,skc3)* -> distinct_points(skc5,skc5).
% 0.70/0.90  2827[5:MRR:2822.0,2822.1,131.1,4.0] ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.90  2828[3:Spt:2827.0,253.2,253.3] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))* apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)).
% 0.70/0.90  2829[4:Spt:2828.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))*.
% 0.70/0.90  2834[4:Res:2829.0,16.1] || distinct_points(skc5,skc3) -> distinct_points(skc3,skc3)*.
% 0.70/0.90  2838[4:MRR:2834.0,2834.1,29.1,4.0] ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.90  2839[4:Spt:2838.0,2828.0,2829.0] || apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  2840[4:Spt:2838.0,2828.1] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))*.
% 0.70/0.90  2844[4:Res:2840.0,15.1] || distinct_points(skc5,skc3)* -> distinct_points(skc5,skc5).
% 0.70/0.90  2849[4:MRR:2844.0,2844.1,131.1,4.0] ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.90  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.70/0.90  Formulae used in the proof : con apart1 apart2 apart4 apart5 ceq1 ceq2 con1 cu1
% 0.70/0.90  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------