↑ Up

ePrincess---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO189+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 12.64s 3.64s
% Output   : Proof 19.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GEO189+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 08:35:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.58          ____       _                          
% 0.19/0.58    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.19/0.58   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.19/0.58  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.19/0.58  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.19/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.19/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.19/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.19/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.19/0.58  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.66/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.60/0.93  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.84/1.06  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 1.99/1.08  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.66/1.26  Prover 0: gave up
% 2.66/1.26  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.66/1.29  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.94/1.38  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.28/1.44  Prover 1: gave up
% 3.28/1.44  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.35/1.46  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.80/1.58  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.80/1.58  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.41/1.73  Prover 2: gave up
% 4.41/1.73  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 4.41/1.75  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.76/1.76  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.76/1.77  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.86/1.81  Prover 3: gave up
% 4.86/1.81  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 4.86/1.82  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 5.20/1.89  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.20/1.89  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.09/3.03  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 10.09/3.05  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 10.40/3.13  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.64/3.63  Prover 5: proved (605ms)
% 12.64/3.63  Prover 4: stopped
% 12.64/3.64  
% 12.64/3.64  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 12.64/3.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 12.64/3.64  
% 12.64/3.64  Generating proof ... found it (size 456)
% 18.83/5.10  
% 18.83/5.10  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 18.83/5.10  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 18.83/5.10  | (0)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v6) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0)) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v6) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v2) = v5 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v5) = 0 & distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0 & distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0)
% 19.16/5.16  | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 19.16/5.16  | (1)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0)))))
% 19.16/5.17  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 19.16/5.17  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.16/5.17  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 19.16/5.17  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.27/5.17  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))
% 19.27/5.17  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 19.27/5.17  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.27/5.17  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 19.27/5.17  | (10)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v2) = v5 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v5) = 0 & distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0 & distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0)
% 19.27/5.17  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0))))
% 19.27/5.17  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 19.27/5.17  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0))))
% 19.27/5.17  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0))))
% 19.27/5.18  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 19.27/5.18  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 19.27/5.18  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 19.27/5.18  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 19.27/5.18  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 19.27/5.18  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 19.27/5.18  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.27/5.18  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.27/5.18  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 19.27/5.18  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 19.27/5.18  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 19.27/5.18  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 19.27/5.18  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 19.27/5.18  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 19.27/5.18  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 19.27/5.18  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 19.27/5.19  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 19.27/5.19  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 19.27/5.19  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 19.27/5.19  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 19.27/5.19  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v6) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0)) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))
% 19.27/5.19  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0))))
% 19.27/5.19  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0))))
% 19.27/5.19  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 19.27/5.19  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 19.27/5.19  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 19.27/5.19  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v6) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0))
% 19.27/5.19  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 19.27/5.19  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 19.27/5.19  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 19.27/5.19  | (45)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 19.27/5.19  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.27/5.19  |
% 19.27/5.19  | Instantiating (10) with all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 yields:
% 19.27/5.19  | (47)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0 & line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = 0 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 19.27/5.19  |
% 19.27/5.19  | Applying alpha-rule on (47) yields:
% 19.27/5.19  | (48)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 19.27/5.19  | (49) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = 0
% 19.27/5.20  | (50) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0
% 19.27/5.20  | (51) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 19.27/5.20  | (52) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2
% 19.27/5.20  | (53) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 19.27/5.20  | (54) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1
% 19.27/5.20  | (55) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (39) with all_1_4_4 yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (56)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (39) with all_1_5_5 yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (57)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (43) with all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (58) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (14) with all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (59)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (14) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (60)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (36) with 0, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (61)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (11) with 0, all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (62)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (16) with all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (63) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (36) with 0, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (64)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (36) with 0, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (65)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (11) with 0, all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (66)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (16) with all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (67) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (36) with 0, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (68)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (37) with 0, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (69)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 19.27/5.20  |
% 19.27/5.20  | Instantiating formula (36) with 0, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 19.27/5.20  | (70)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Instantiating formula (11) with 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (71)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Instantiating (71) with all_16_0_6, all_16_1_7, all_16_2_8 yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (72) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_2_8 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6 & ( ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0) |  ~ (all_16_2_8 = 0) | all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (72) yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (73) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7
% 19.27/5.21  | (74) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_2_8
% 19.27/5.21  | (75) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 19.27/5.21  | (76)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0) |  ~ (all_16_2_8 = 0) | all_16_0_6 = 0
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Instantiating (69) with all_18_0_9, all_18_1_10, all_18_2_11 yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (77) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_18_2_11 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = all_18_1_10 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_18_0_9 & ( ~ (all_18_1_10 = 0) | all_18_0_9 = 0)
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (77) yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (78) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_18_2_11
% 19.27/5.21  | (79) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = all_18_1_10
% 19.27/5.21  | (80) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_18_0_9
% 19.27/5.21  | (81)  ~ (all_18_1_10 = 0) | all_18_0_9 = 0
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Instantiating (62) with all_20_0_12, all_20_1_13, all_20_2_14 yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (82) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_20_1_13 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_20_0_12 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_20_2_14 & ( ~ (all_20_1_13 = 0) |  ~ (all_20_2_14 = 0) | all_20_0_12 = 0)
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (82) yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (83) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_20_1_13
% 19.27/5.21  | (84) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_20_0_12
% 19.27/5.21  | (85) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_20_2_14
% 19.27/5.21  | (86)  ~ (all_20_1_13 = 0) |  ~ (all_20_2_14 = 0) | all_20_0_12 = 0
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Instantiating (61) with all_22_0_15, all_22_1_16, all_22_2_17 yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (87) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_22_2_17 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_22_2_17) = all_22_1_16 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_15 & ( ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0) | all_22_0_15 = 0)
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (87) yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (88) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_22_2_17
% 19.27/5.21  | (89) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_22_2_17) = all_22_1_16
% 19.27/5.21  | (90) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_15
% 19.27/5.21  | (91)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0) | all_22_0_15 = 0
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Instantiating (59) with all_24_0_18, all_24_1_19, all_24_2_20 yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (92) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_18 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_24_1_19 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_24_2_20 & ( ~ (all_24_2_20 = 0) | (all_24_0_18 = 0 & all_24_1_19 = 0))
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (92) yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (93) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_18
% 19.27/5.21  | (94) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_24_1_19
% 19.27/5.21  | (95) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_24_2_20
% 19.27/5.21  | (96)  ~ (all_24_2_20 = 0) | (all_24_0_18 = 0 & all_24_1_19 = 0)
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Instantiating (68) with all_26_0_21, all_26_1_22, all_26_2_23 yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (97) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_26_2_23 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_26_2_23) = all_26_1_22 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_26_0_21 & ( ~ (all_26_1_22 = 0) | all_26_0_21 = 0)
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (97) yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (98) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_26_2_23
% 19.27/5.21  | (99) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_26_2_23) = all_26_1_22
% 19.27/5.21  | (100) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_26_0_21
% 19.27/5.21  | (101)  ~ (all_26_1_22 = 0) | all_26_0_21 = 0
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Instantiating (70) with all_28_0_24, all_28_1_25, all_28_2_26 yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (102) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_28_2_26 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_28_2_26) = all_28_1_25 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_24 & ( ~ (all_28_1_25 = 0) | all_28_0_24 = 0)
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (102) yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (103) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_28_2_26
% 19.27/5.21  | (104) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_28_2_26) = all_28_1_25
% 19.27/5.21  | (105) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_24
% 19.27/5.21  | (106)  ~ (all_28_1_25 = 0) | all_28_0_24 = 0
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Instantiating (66) with all_32_0_30, all_32_1_31, all_32_2_32 yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (107) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_32_2_32 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_32_0_30 & ( ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0) |  ~ (all_32_2_32 = 0) | all_32_0_30 = 0)
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (107) yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (108) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31
% 19.27/5.21  | (109) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_32_2_32
% 19.27/5.21  | (110) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_32_0_30
% 19.27/5.21  | (111)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0) |  ~ (all_32_2_32 = 0) | all_32_0_30 = 0
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Instantiating (65) with all_34_0_33, all_34_1_34, all_34_2_35 yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (112) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_34_2_35 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_34_2_35) = all_34_1_34 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_33 & ( ~ (all_34_1_34 = 0) | all_34_0_33 = 0)
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (112) yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (113) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_34_2_35
% 19.27/5.21  | (114) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_34_2_35) = all_34_1_34
% 19.27/5.21  | (115) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_33
% 19.27/5.21  | (116)  ~ (all_34_1_34 = 0) | all_34_0_33 = 0
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Instantiating (64) with all_36_0_36, all_36_1_37, all_36_2_38 yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (117) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_36_2_38 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_36_2_38) = all_36_1_37 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_36_0_36 & ( ~ (all_36_1_37 = 0) | all_36_0_36 = 0)
% 19.27/5.21  |
% 19.27/5.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (117) yields:
% 19.27/5.21  | (118) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_36_2_38
% 19.27/5.22  | (119) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_36_2_38) = all_36_1_37
% 19.27/5.22  | (120) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_36_0_36
% 19.27/5.22  | (121)  ~ (all_36_1_37 = 0) | all_36_0_36 = 0
% 19.27/5.22  |
% 19.27/5.22  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (67), into two cases.
% 19.27/5.22  |-Branch one:
% 19.27/5.22  | (122) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 19.27/5.22  |
% 19.27/5.22  	| Equations (122) can reduce 48 to:
% 19.27/5.22  	| (123) $false
% 19.27/5.22  	|
% 19.27/5.22  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.27/5.22  |-Branch two:
% 19.27/5.22  | (48)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 19.27/5.22  | (125)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.27/5.22  |
% 19.27/5.22  	| Instantiating (125) with all_42_0_39, all_42_1_40, all_42_2_41 yields:
% 19.27/5.22  	| (126) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_42_0_39 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_42_1_40 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_42_2_41 & ( ~ (all_42_2_41 = 0) | all_42_0_39 = 0 | all_42_1_40 = 0)
% 19.27/5.22  	|
% 19.27/5.22  	| Applying alpha-rule on (126) yields:
% 19.27/5.22  	| (127) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_42_0_39
% 19.27/5.22  	| (128) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_42_1_40
% 19.27/5.22  	| (129) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_42_2_41
% 19.27/5.22  	| (130)  ~ (all_42_2_41 = 0) | all_42_0_39 = 0 | all_42_1_40 = 0
% 19.27/5.22  	|
% 19.27/5.22  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (63), into two cases.
% 19.27/5.22  	|-Branch one:
% 19.27/5.22  	| (122) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 19.27/5.22  	|
% 19.27/5.22  		| Equations (122) can reduce 48 to:
% 19.27/5.22  		| (123) $false
% 19.27/5.22  		|
% 19.27/5.22  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.27/5.22  	|-Branch two:
% 19.27/5.22  	| (48)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 19.27/5.22  	| (134)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.27/5.22  	|
% 19.27/5.22  		| Instantiating (134) with all_47_0_42, all_47_1_43, all_47_2_44 yields:
% 19.27/5.22  		| (135) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_0_42 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_47_2_44 & ( ~ (all_47_2_44 = 0) | all_47_0_42 = 0 | all_47_1_43 = 0)
% 19.27/5.22  		|
% 19.27/5.22  		| Applying alpha-rule on (135) yields:
% 19.27/5.22  		| (136) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_0_42
% 19.27/5.22  		| (137) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43
% 19.27/5.22  		| (138) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_47_2_44
% 19.27/5.22  		| (139)  ~ (all_47_2_44 = 0) | all_47_0_42 = 0 | all_47_1_43 = 0
% 19.27/5.22  		|
% 19.27/5.22  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (58), into two cases.
% 19.27/5.22  		|-Branch one:
% 19.27/5.22  		| (122) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 19.27/5.22  		|
% 19.27/5.22  			| Equations (122) can reduce 48 to:
% 19.27/5.22  			| (123) $false
% 19.27/5.22  			|
% 19.27/5.22  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.27/5.22  		|-Branch two:
% 19.27/5.22  		| (48)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 19.27/5.22  		| (143)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.54/5.22  		|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating (143) with all_52_0_45, all_52_1_46, all_52_2_47, all_52_3_48 yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (144) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_52_0_45 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_52_1_46 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_52_2_47 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_52_3_48 & ( ~ (all_52_2_47 = 0) |  ~ (all_52_3_48 = 0) | all_52_0_45 = 0 | all_52_1_46 = 0)
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Applying alpha-rule on (144) yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (145) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_52_1_46
% 19.54/5.22  			| (146)  ~ (all_52_2_47 = 0) |  ~ (all_52_3_48 = 0) | all_52_0_45 = 0 | all_52_1_46 = 0
% 19.54/5.22  			| (147) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_52_0_45
% 19.54/5.22  			| (148) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_52_3_48
% 19.54/5.22  			| (149) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_52_2_47
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_22_2_17, all_36_2_38 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_36_2_38, line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_22_2_17, yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (150) all_36_2_38 = all_22_2_17
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_18_2_11, all_36_2_38 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_36_2_38, line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_18_2_11, yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (151) all_36_2_38 = all_18_2_11
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_34_2_35, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_34_2_35, line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (152) all_34_2_35 = all_1_0_0
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_26_2_23, all_34_2_35 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_34_2_35, line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_26_2_23, yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (153) all_34_2_35 = all_26_2_23
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_28_2_26, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_28_2_26, line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (154) all_28_2_26 = all_1_2_2
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_52_0_45, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_52_0_45, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (155) all_52_0_45 = all_1_1_1
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_52_1_46, all_52_0_45 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_52_0_45, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_52_1_46, yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (156) all_52_0_45 = all_52_1_46
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_26_1_22, 0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (157) all_26_1_22 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_26_1_22)
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_22_1_16, 0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (158) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_22_1_16)
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_20_1_13, 0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_20_1_13, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (159) all_20_1_13 = 0
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_47_1_43, all_47_0_42 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_0_42, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43, yields:
% 19.54/5.22  			| (160) all_47_0_42 = all_47_1_43
% 19.54/5.22  			|
% 19.54/5.22  			| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0, all_32_1_31, all_34_1_34 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (161) all_34_1_34 = all_32_1_31 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_34_1_34)
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_42_0_39, all_28_1_25 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_42_0_39, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (162) all_42_0_39 = all_28_1_25 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_28_1_25)
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_16_1_7, all_42_0_39 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_42_0_39, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (163) all_42_0_39 = all_16_1_7
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (39) with all_1_3_3 yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (164)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Using (90) and (56) yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (165)  ~ (all_22_0_15 = 0)
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_24_1_19, all_26_0_21 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_26_0_21, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_24_1_19, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (166) all_26_0_21 = all_24_1_19
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_20_0_12, all_26_0_21 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_26_0_21, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_20_0_12, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (167) all_26_0_21 = all_20_0_12
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_24_2_20, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_24_2_20, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (168) all_24_2_20 = 0
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_24_2_20, all_32_2_32 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_32_2_32, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_24_2_20, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (169) all_32_2_32 = all_24_2_20
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_20_2_14, all_32_2_32 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_32_2_32, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_20_2_14, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (170) all_32_2_32 = all_20_2_14
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_18_0_9, all_24_2_20 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_24_2_20, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_18_0_9, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (171) all_24_2_20 = all_18_0_9
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_36_0_36, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_36_0_36, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (172) all_36_0_36 = 0
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_16_2_8, all_36_0_36 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_36_0_36, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_2_8, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (173) all_36_0_36 = all_16_2_8
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_32_0_30, all_34_0_33 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_33, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_32_0_30, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (174) all_34_0_33 = all_32_0_30
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_28_0_24, all_32_0_30 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_32_0_30, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_24, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (175) all_32_0_30 = all_28_0_24
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Using (105) and (57) yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (176)  ~ (all_28_0_24 = 0)
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_16_0_6, all_34_0_33 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_33, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (177) all_34_0_33 = all_16_0_6
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Combining equations (155,156) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (178) all_52_1_46 = all_1_1_1
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Combining equations (173,172) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (179) all_16_2_8 = 0
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Simplifying 179 yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (180) all_16_2_8 = 0
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Combining equations (150,151) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (181) all_22_2_17 = all_18_2_11
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Simplifying 181 yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (182) all_22_2_17 = all_18_2_11
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Combining equations (174,177) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (183) all_32_0_30 = all_16_0_6
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Simplifying 183 yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (184) all_32_0_30 = all_16_0_6
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Combining equations (152,153) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (185) all_26_2_23 = all_1_0_0
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Combining equations (184,175) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (186) all_28_0_24 = all_16_0_6
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Combining equations (169,170) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (187) all_24_2_20 = all_20_2_14
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Simplifying 187 yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (188) all_24_2_20 = all_20_2_14
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Combining equations (167,166) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (189) all_24_1_19 = all_20_0_12
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Combining equations (168,188) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (190) all_20_2_14 = 0
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Combining equations (171,188) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (191) all_20_2_14 = all_18_0_9
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Combining equations (191,190) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (192) all_18_0_9 = 0
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Simplifying 192 yields:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (193) all_18_0_9 = 0
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Combining equations (185,153) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (152) all_34_2_35 = all_1_0_0
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| Equations (186) can reduce 176 to:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (195)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| From (185) and (98) follows:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (50) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| From (178) and (145) follows:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (54) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| From (185) and (99) follows:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (198) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_26_1_22
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| From (182) and (89) follows:
% 19.54/5.23  			| (199) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16
% 19.54/5.23  			|
% 19.54/5.23  			| From (160) and (136) follows:
% 19.54/5.24  			| (137) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43
% 19.54/5.24  			|
% 19.54/5.24  			| From (152) and (114) follows:
% 19.54/5.24  			| (201) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_34_1_34
% 19.54/5.24  			|
% 19.54/5.24  			| From (154) and (104) follows:
% 19.54/5.24  			| (202) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_28_1_25
% 19.54/5.24  			|
% 19.54/5.24  			| From (189) and (94) follows:
% 19.54/5.24  			| (84) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_20_0_12
% 19.54/5.24  			|
% 19.54/5.24  			| From (193) and (80) follows:
% 19.54/5.24  			| (51) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 19.54/5.24  			|
% 19.54/5.24  			| From (180) and (74) follows:
% 19.54/5.24  			| (55) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 19.54/5.24  			|
% 19.54/5.24  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (91), into two cases.
% 19.54/5.24  			|-Branch one:
% 19.54/5.24  			| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.54/5.24  			|
% 19.54/5.24  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (86), into two cases.
% 19.54/5.24  				|-Branch one:
% 19.54/5.24  				| (207)  ~ (all_20_1_13 = 0)
% 19.54/5.24  				|
% 19.54/5.24  					| Equations (159) can reduce 207 to:
% 19.54/5.24  					| (123) $false
% 19.54/5.24  					|
% 19.54/5.24  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.54/5.24  				|-Branch two:
% 19.54/5.24  				| (159) all_20_1_13 = 0
% 19.54/5.24  				| (210)  ~ (all_20_2_14 = 0) | all_20_0_12 = 0
% 19.54/5.24  				|
% 19.54/5.24  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 19.54/5.24  					|-Branch one:
% 19.54/5.24  					| (211)  ~ (all_20_2_14 = 0)
% 19.54/5.24  					|
% 19.54/5.24  						| Equations (190) can reduce 211 to:
% 19.54/5.24  						| (123) $false
% 19.54/5.24  						|
% 19.54/5.24  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.54/5.24  					|-Branch two:
% 19.54/5.24  					| (190) all_20_2_14 = 0
% 19.54/5.24  					| (214) all_20_0_12 = 0
% 19.54/5.24  					|
% 19.54/5.24  						| From (214) and (84) follows:
% 19.54/5.24  						| (215) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 19.54/5.24  						|
% 19.54/5.24  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (106), into two cases.
% 19.54/5.24  						|-Branch one:
% 19.54/5.24  						| (216)  ~ (all_28_1_25 = 0)
% 19.54/5.24  						|
% 19.54/5.24  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (116), into two cases.
% 19.54/5.24  							|-Branch one:
% 19.54/5.24  							| (217)  ~ (all_34_1_34 = 0)
% 19.54/5.24  							|
% 19.54/5.24  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (60), into two cases.
% 19.54/5.24  								|-Branch one:
% 19.54/5.24  								| (218)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 19.54/5.24  								|
% 19.54/5.24  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (158), into two cases.
% 19.54/5.24  									|-Branch one:
% 19.54/5.24  									| (219)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_22_1_16)
% 19.54/5.24  									|
% 19.54/5.24  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (162), into two cases.
% 19.54/5.24  										|-Branch one:
% 19.54/5.24  										| (220)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_28_1_25)
% 19.54/5.24  										|
% 19.54/5.24  											| Using (202) and (220) yields:
% 19.54/5.24  											| (221) $false
% 19.54/5.24  											|
% 19.54/5.24  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.54/5.24  										|-Branch two:
% 19.54/5.24  										| (202) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_28_1_25
% 19.54/5.24  										| (223) all_42_0_39 = all_28_1_25
% 19.54/5.24  										|
% 19.54/5.24  											| Combining equations (223,163) yields a new equation:
% 19.54/5.24  											| (224) all_28_1_25 = all_16_1_7
% 19.54/5.24  											|
% 19.54/5.24  											| Simplifying 224 yields:
% 19.54/5.24  											| (225) all_28_1_25 = all_16_1_7
% 19.54/5.24  											|
% 19.54/5.24  											| Equations (225) can reduce 216 to:
% 19.54/5.24  											| (226)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 19.54/5.24  											|
% 19.54/5.24  											| From (225) and (202) follows:
% 19.54/5.24  											| (73) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7
% 19.54/5.24  											|
% 19.54/5.24  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (157), into two cases.
% 19.54/5.24  											|-Branch one:
% 19.54/5.24  											| (228)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_26_1_22)
% 19.54/5.24  											|
% 19.54/5.24  												| Using (198) and (228) yields:
% 19.54/5.24  												| (221) $false
% 19.54/5.24  												|
% 19.54/5.24  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.54/5.24  											|-Branch two:
% 19.54/5.24  											| (198) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_26_1_22
% 19.54/5.24  											| (231) all_26_1_22 = 0
% 19.54/5.24  											|
% 19.54/5.24  												| From (231) and (198) follows:
% 19.54/5.24  												| (49) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = 0
% 19.54/5.24  												|
% 19.54/5.24  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (161), into two cases.
% 19.54/5.24  												|-Branch one:
% 19.54/5.24  												| (233)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_34_1_34)
% 19.54/5.24  												|
% 19.54/5.24  													| Using (201) and (233) yields:
% 19.54/5.24  													| (221) $false
% 19.54/5.24  													|
% 19.54/5.24  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.54/5.24  												|-Branch two:
% 19.54/5.24  												| (201) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_34_1_34
% 19.54/5.24  												| (236) all_34_1_34 = all_32_1_31
% 19.54/5.24  												|
% 19.54/5.24  													| Equations (236) can reduce 217 to:
% 19.54/5.24  													| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.54/5.24  													|
% 19.54/5.24  													| From (236) and (201) follows:
% 19.54/5.24  													| (108) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31
% 19.54/5.24  													|
% 19.54/5.24  													| Using (137) and (218) yields:
% 19.54/5.24  													| (239)  ~ (all_47_1_43 = 0)
% 19.54/5.24  													|
% 19.54/5.24  													| Using (148) and (164) yields:
% 19.54/5.24  													| (240)  ~ (all_52_3_48 = 0)
% 19.54/5.24  													|
% 19.54/5.24  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_22_1_16, all_1_1_1, all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, yields:
% 19.54/5.24  													| (241) all_22_1_16 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.54/5.24  													|
% 19.54/5.24  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_1_1_1, all_22_1_16, all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, yields:
% 19.54/5.24  													| (242) all_22_1_16 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_18_2_11) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.54/5.24  													|
% 19.54/5.24  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_22_1_16, all_22_1_16, all_18_2_11, all_18_2_11, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, yields:
% 19.54/5.24  													| (243) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.54/5.24  													|
% 19.54/5.24  													| Instantiating formula (31) with all_47_1_43, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = 0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43, yields:
% 19.54/5.25  													| (244) all_47_1_43 = 0 | distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 19.54/5.25  													|
% 19.54/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_47_1_43, all_22_1_16, all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43, yields:
% 19.54/5.25  													| (245) all_47_1_43 = 0 | all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.54/5.25  													|
% 19.54/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_22_1_16, all_47_1_43, all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43, yields:
% 19.54/5.25  													| (246) all_47_1_43 = 0 | all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.54/5.25  													|
% 19.54/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_47_1_43, all_22_1_16, all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43, yields:
% 19.54/5.25  													| (247) all_47_1_43 = 0 | all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.54/5.25  													|
% 19.54/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_22_1_16, all_47_1_43, all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43, yields:
% 19.54/5.25  													| (248) all_47_1_43 = 0 | all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.54/5.25  													|
% 19.54/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_32_1_31, all_1_1_1, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, yields:
% 19.54/5.25  													| (249) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.54/5.25  													|
% 19.68/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_32_1_31, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, yields:
% 19.68/5.25  													| (250) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.25  													|
% 19.68/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_1_1_1, all_32_1_31, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, yields:
% 19.68/5.25  													| (251) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.25  													|
% 19.68/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_32_1_31, all_22_1_16, all_1_0_0, all_18_2_11, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, yields:
% 19.68/5.25  													| (252) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.25  													|
% 19.68/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_22_1_16, all_32_1_31, all_18_2_11, all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, yields:
% 19.68/5.25  													| (253) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.25  													|
% 19.68/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_32_1_31, all_22_1_16, all_18_2_11, all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, yields:
% 19.68/5.25  													| (254) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.25  													|
% 19.68/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_22_1_16, all_32_1_31, all_1_0_0, all_18_2_11, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, yields:
% 19.68/5.25  													| (255) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.25  													|
% 19.68/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_32_1_31, all_47_1_43, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, yields:
% 19.68/5.25  													| (256) all_47_1_43 = 0 | all_32_1_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.25  													|
% 19.68/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_47_1_43, all_32_1_31, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, yields:
% 19.68/5.25  													| (257) all_47_1_43 = 0 | all_32_1_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.25  													|
% 19.68/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (2) with all_32_1_31, all_32_1_31, all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.25  													| (258) all_32_1_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.25  													|
% 19.68/5.25  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_32_1_31, all_32_1_31, all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, yields:
% 19.68/5.25  													| (259) all_32_1_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.25  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_16_1_7, all_22_1_16, all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (260) all_22_1_16 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_22_1_16, all_16_1_7, all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (261) all_22_1_16 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_16_1_7, all_22_1_16, all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (262) all_22_1_16 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_22_1_16, all_16_1_7, all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (263) all_22_1_16 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (2) with all_16_1_7, all_32_1_31, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (264) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (2) with all_32_1_31, all_16_1_7, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (265) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_16_1_7, all_32_1_31, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (266) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (43) with all_32_1_31, all_16_1_7, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (267) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_16_1_7, all_32_1_31, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (268) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_32_1_31, all_16_1_7, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (269) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (36) with all_52_3_48, all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_52_3_48, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (270)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_52_3_48 = 0)))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (41) with all_52_3_48, all_52_3_48, all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_52_3_48, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (271) all_52_3_48 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (11) with all_52_3_48, all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_52_3_48, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (272)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_52_3_48 = 0)))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (2) with all_22_1_16, all_22_1_16, all_18_2_11, all_18_2_11, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (273) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_18_2_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (2) with all_22_1_16, all_47_1_43, all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (274) all_47_1_43 = 0 | all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (2) with all_47_1_43, all_22_1_16, all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_47_1_43, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (275) all_47_1_43 = 0 | all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (16) with all_32_1_31, all_32_1_31, all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (276) all_32_1_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (16) with all_32_1_31, all_16_1_7, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (277) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating formula (16) with all_16_1_7, all_32_1_31, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_32_1_31, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (278) all_32_1_31 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating (272) with all_143_0_79, all_143_1_80, all_143_2_81 yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (279) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_143_1_80 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_143_0_79 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_143_2_81 & ( ~ (all_143_1_80 = 0) |  ~ (all_143_2_81 = 0) | (all_143_0_79 = 0 & all_52_3_48 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Applying alpha-rule on (279) yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (280) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_143_1_80
% 19.68/5.26  													| (281) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_143_0_79
% 19.68/5.26  													| (282) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_143_2_81
% 19.68/5.26  													| (283)  ~ (all_143_1_80 = 0) |  ~ (all_143_2_81 = 0) | (all_143_0_79 = 0 & all_52_3_48 = 0)
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Instantiating (270) with all_147_0_85, all_147_1_86, all_147_2_87 yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (284) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_147_2_87 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_147_2_87) = all_147_1_86 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_147_0_85 & ( ~ (all_147_1_86 = 0) | (all_147_0_85 = 0 & all_52_3_48 = 0))
% 19.68/5.26  													|
% 19.68/5.26  													| Applying alpha-rule on (284) yields:
% 19.68/5.26  													| (285) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_147_2_87
% 19.68/5.26  													| (286) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_147_2_87) = all_147_1_86
% 19.68/5.26  													| (287) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_147_0_85
% 19.68/5.26  													| (288)  ~ (all_147_1_86 = 0) | (all_147_0_85 = 0 & all_52_3_48 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  													|
% 19.68/5.27  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (271), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  													|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  													| (289) all_52_3_48 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  													|
% 19.68/5.27  														| Equations (289) can reduce 240 to:
% 19.68/5.27  														| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  														|
% 19.68/5.27  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  													|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  													| (240)  ~ (all_52_3_48 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  													| (292)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 19.68/5.27  													|
% 19.68/5.27  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (263), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  														|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  														| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  														|
% 19.68/5.27  															| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.27  															| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  															|
% 19.68/5.27  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  														|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  														| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  														| (296) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  														|
% 19.68/5.27  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (278), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  															|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  															| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  															|
% 19.68/5.27  																| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																|
% 19.68/5.27  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  															|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  															| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  															| (300) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  															|
% 19.68/5.27  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (277), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																|
% 19.68/5.27  																	| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																	| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																	|
% 19.68/5.27  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																| (304) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  																|
% 19.68/5.27  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (264), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																	|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																	| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																	|
% 19.68/5.27  																		| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																		| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																		|
% 19.68/5.27  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																	|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																	| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																	| (308) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  																	|
% 19.68/5.27  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (265), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																		|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																		| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																		|
% 19.68/5.27  																			| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																			| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																			|
% 19.68/5.27  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																		|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																		| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																		| (312) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  																		|
% 19.68/5.27  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (266), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																			|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																			| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																			|
% 19.68/5.27  																				| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																				| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																				|
% 19.68/5.27  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																			|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																			| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																			| (316) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  																			|
% 19.68/5.27  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (267), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																				|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																				| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																				|
% 19.68/5.27  																					| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																					| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																					|
% 19.68/5.27  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																				|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																				| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																				| (320) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  																				|
% 19.68/5.27  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																					|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																					| (321)  ~ (all_147_1_86 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																					|
% 19.68/5.27  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (268), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																						|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																						| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																						|
% 19.68/5.27  																							| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																							| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																							|
% 19.68/5.27  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																						|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																						| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																						| (325) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  																						|
% 19.68/5.27  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (269), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																							|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																							| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																							|
% 19.68/5.27  																								| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																								| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																								|
% 19.68/5.27  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																							|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																							| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																							| (329) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  																							|
% 19.68/5.27  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (329), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																								|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																								| (330) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																								|
% 19.68/5.27  																									| Equations (330) can reduce 226 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																									| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																									|
% 19.68/5.27  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																								|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																								| (226)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																								| (333)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  																								|
% 19.68/5.27  																									| Instantiating (333) with all_196_0_91, all_196_1_92, all_196_2_93, all_196_3_94 yields:
% 19.68/5.27  																									| (334) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_196_1_92 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_196_0_91 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = all_196_2_93 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_196_3_94 & ( ~ (all_196_2_93 = 0) |  ~ (all_196_3_94 = 0) | all_196_0_91 = 0 | all_196_1_92 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																									|
% 19.68/5.27  																									| Applying alpha-rule on (334) yields:
% 19.68/5.27  																									| (335) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_196_0_91
% 19.68/5.27  																									| (336)  ~ (all_196_2_93 = 0) |  ~ (all_196_3_94 = 0) | all_196_0_91 = 0 | all_196_1_92 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																									| (337) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_196_3_94
% 19.68/5.27  																									| (338) distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = all_196_2_93
% 19.68/5.27  																									| (339) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = all_196_1_92
% 19.68/5.27  																									|
% 19.68/5.27  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (273), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																									|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																									| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																									|
% 19.68/5.27  																										| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																										| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																										|
% 19.68/5.27  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																									|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																									| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																									| (343)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_18_2_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  																									|
% 19.68/5.27  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (243), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																										|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																										| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																										|
% 19.68/5.27  																											| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																											| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																											|
% 19.68/5.27  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																										|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																										| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																										| (347)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  																										|
% 19.68/5.27  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (244), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																											|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																											| (348) distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																											|
% 19.68/5.27  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (258), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																												|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																												| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																												|
% 19.68/5.27  																													| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																													| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																													|
% 19.68/5.27  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																												|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																												| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																												| (352)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  																												|
% 19.68/5.27  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (276), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																													|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																													| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																													|
% 19.68/5.27  																														| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																														| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																														|
% 19.68/5.27  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																													|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																													| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																													| (356)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.27  																													|
% 19.68/5.27  																														| Instantiating (356) with all_237_0_108, all_237_1_109, all_237_2_110 yields:
% 19.68/5.27  																														| (357) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_237_0_108 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_237_1_109 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = all_237_2_110 & ( ~ (all_237_2_110 = 0) | all_237_0_108 = 0 | all_237_1_109 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																														|
% 19.68/5.27  																														| Applying alpha-rule on (357) yields:
% 19.68/5.27  																														| (358) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_237_0_108
% 19.68/5.27  																														| (359) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_237_1_109
% 19.68/5.27  																														| (360) distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = all_237_2_110
% 19.68/5.27  																														| (361)  ~ (all_237_2_110 = 0) | all_237_0_108 = 0 | all_237_1_109 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																														|
% 19.68/5.27  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (259), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.27  																														|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.27  																														| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.27  																														|
% 19.68/5.27  																															| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.27  																															| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.27  																															|
% 19.68/5.27  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.27  																														|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.27  																														| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.27  																														| (365)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																														|
% 19.68/5.28  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (253), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																															|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																															| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																															|
% 19.68/5.28  																																| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																|
% 19.68/5.28  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																															|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																															| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																															| (369) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																															|
% 19.68/5.28  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (246), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																| (370) all_47_1_43 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																|
% 19.68/5.28  																																	| Equations (370) can reduce 239 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																	| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																	|
% 19.68/5.28  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																| (239)  ~ (all_47_1_43 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																| (373) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																|
% 19.68/5.28  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (275), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																	| (370) all_47_1_43 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																	|
% 19.68/5.28  																																		| Equations (370) can reduce 239 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																		| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																		|
% 19.68/5.28  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																	| (239)  ~ (all_47_1_43 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																	| (377) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																	|
% 19.68/5.28  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (254), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																		| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																		|
% 19.68/5.28  																																			| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																			| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																			|
% 19.68/5.28  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																		| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																		| (381) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																		|
% 19.68/5.28  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (255), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																			| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																			|
% 19.68/5.28  																																				| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																				| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																				|
% 19.68/5.28  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																			| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																			| (385) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																			|
% 19.68/5.28  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (256), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																				| (370) all_47_1_43 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																				|
% 19.68/5.28  																																					| Equations (370) can reduce 239 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																					| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																					|
% 19.68/5.28  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																				| (239)  ~ (all_47_1_43 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																				| (389) all_32_1_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																				|
% 19.68/5.28  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (257), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																					| (370) all_47_1_43 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																					|
% 19.68/5.28  																																						| Equations (370) can reduce 239 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																						| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																						|
% 19.68/5.28  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																					| (239)  ~ (all_47_1_43 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																					| (393) all_32_1_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																					|
% 19.68/5.28  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (274), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																						|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																						| (370) all_47_1_43 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																						|
% 19.68/5.28  																																							| Equations (370) can reduce 239 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																							| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																							|
% 19.68/5.28  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																						|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																						| (239)  ~ (all_47_1_43 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																						| (397) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																						|
% 19.68/5.28  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (245), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																							| (370) all_47_1_43 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																							|
% 19.68/5.28  																																								| Equations (370) can reduce 239 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																								| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																								|
% 19.68/5.28  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																							| (239)  ~ (all_47_1_43 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																							| (401) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																							|
% 19.68/5.28  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (247), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																								| (370) all_47_1_43 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																								|
% 19.68/5.28  																																									| Equations (370) can reduce 239 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																									| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																									|
% 19.68/5.28  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																								| (239)  ~ (all_47_1_43 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																								| (405) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																								|
% 19.68/5.28  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (248), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																									| (370) all_47_1_43 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																									|
% 19.68/5.28  																																										| Equations (370) can reduce 239 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																										| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																										|
% 19.68/5.28  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																									| (239)  ~ (all_47_1_43 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																									| (409) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																									|
% 19.68/5.28  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (249), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																										| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																										|
% 19.68/5.28  																																											| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																											| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																											|
% 19.68/5.28  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																										| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																										| (413) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																										|
% 19.68/5.28  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (251), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																											|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																											| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																											|
% 19.68/5.28  																																												| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																												| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																												|
% 19.68/5.28  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																											|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																											| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																											| (417) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																											|
% 19.68/5.28  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (252), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																												|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																												| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																												|
% 19.68/5.28  																																													| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																													| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																													|
% 19.68/5.28  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																												|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																												| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																												| (421) all_22_1_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																												|
% 19.68/5.28  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (260), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																													|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																													| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																													|
% 19.68/5.28  																																														| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																														| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																														|
% 19.68/5.28  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																													|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																													| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																													| (425) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																													|
% 19.68/5.28  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (261), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																														|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																														| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																														|
% 19.68/5.28  																																															| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																															| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																															|
% 19.68/5.28  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																														|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																														| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																														| (429) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																														|
% 19.68/5.28  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (262), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																															|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																															| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																															|
% 19.68/5.28  																																																| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																																| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																																|
% 19.68/5.28  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																															|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																															| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																															| (433) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																															|
% 19.68/5.28  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (304), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																																|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																																| (330) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																																|
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	| Equations (330) can reduce 226 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	|
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																																|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																																| (226)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																																| (437)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																																|
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	| Instantiating (437) with all_313_0_124, all_313_1_125, all_313_2_126 yields:
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	| (438) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_313_0_124 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_313_1_125 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = all_313_2_126 & ( ~ (all_313_2_126 = 0) | all_313_0_124 = 0 | all_313_1_125 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	|
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (438) yields:
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	| (439) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_313_0_124
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	| (440) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_313_1_125
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	| (441) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = all_313_2_126
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	| (442)  ~ (all_313_2_126 = 0) | all_313_0_124 = 0 | all_313_1_125 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	|
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (312), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	| (330) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	|
% 19.68/5.28  																																																		| Equations (330) can reduce 226 to:
% 19.68/5.28  																																																		| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.28  																																																		|
% 19.68/5.28  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	| (226)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	| (446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.28  																																																	|
% 19.68/5.28  																																																		| Instantiating (446) with all_318_0_127, all_318_1_128, all_318_2_129 yields:
% 19.68/5.28  																																																		| (447) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_318_0_127 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_318_1_128 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = all_318_2_129 & ( ~ (all_318_2_129 = 0) | all_318_0_127 = 0 | all_318_1_128 = 0)
% 19.68/5.28  																																																		|
% 19.68/5.28  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (447) yields:
% 19.68/5.28  																																																		| (448) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_318_0_127
% 19.68/5.29  																																																		| (449) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_318_1_128
% 19.68/5.29  																																																		| (450) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = all_318_2_129
% 19.68/5.29  																																																		| (451)  ~ (all_318_2_129 = 0) | all_318_0_127 = 0 | all_318_1_128 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																		|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (320), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																		| (330) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																		|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																			| Equations (330) can reduce 226 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																			| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																			|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																		| (226)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																		| (455)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																		|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (325), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																			| (330) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																			|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																				| Equations (330) can reduce 226 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																				| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																				|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																			| (226)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																			| (459)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																			|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (369), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																				| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																				|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																				| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																				| (463)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																				|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| Instantiating (463) with all_343_0_138, all_343_1_139, all_343_2_140, all_343_3_141 yields:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| (464) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_343_0_138 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = all_343_1_139 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_18_2_11) = all_343_2_140 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_343_3_141 & ( ~ (all_343_2_140 = 0) |  ~ (all_343_3_141 = 0) | all_343_0_138 = 0 | all_343_1_139 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (464) yields:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| (465) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_343_0_138
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| (466) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_343_3_141
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| (467)  ~ (all_343_2_140 = 0) |  ~ (all_343_3_141 = 0) | all_343_0_138 = 0 | all_343_1_139 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| (468) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = all_343_1_139
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| (469) distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_18_2_11) = all_343_2_140
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (373), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																						| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																						| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																						|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					| (473)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																					|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (377), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																						| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																						|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																							| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																							| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																							|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																						| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																						| (477)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																						|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (381), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																							| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																							|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																							| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																							| (481)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																							|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| Instantiating (481) with all_358_0_149, all_358_1_150, all_358_2_151, all_358_3_152 yields:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| (482) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_358_1_150 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = all_358_0_149 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_18_2_11) = all_358_2_151 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_358_3_152 & ( ~ (all_358_2_151 = 0) |  ~ (all_358_3_152 = 0) | all_358_0_149 = 0 | all_358_1_150 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (482) yields:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| (483) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_358_1_150
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| (484)  ~ (all_358_2_151 = 0) |  ~ (all_358_3_152 = 0) | all_358_0_149 = 0 | all_358_1_150 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| (485) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = all_358_0_149
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| (486) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_358_3_152
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| (487) distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_18_2_11) = all_358_2_151
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (385), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								| (491)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																								|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| Instantiating (491) with all_363_0_153, all_363_1_154, all_363_2_155, all_363_3_156 yields:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| (492) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_363_0_153 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = all_363_1_154 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_0_0) = all_363_2_155 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_363_3_156 & ( ~ (all_363_2_155 = 0) |  ~ (all_363_3_156 = 0) | all_363_0_153 = 0 | all_363_1_154 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (492) yields:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| (493) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_363_3_156
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| (494) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = all_363_1_154
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| (495) distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_0_0) = all_363_2_155
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| (496) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_363_0_153
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| (497)  ~ (all_363_2_155 = 0) |  ~ (all_363_3_156 = 0) | all_363_0_153 = 0 | all_363_1_154 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (397), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																										| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																										| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																										|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									| (501)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																									|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (401), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																										| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																										|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																											| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																											| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																											|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																										| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																										| (505)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																										|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (405), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																											| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																											|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																												| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																												| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																												|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																											| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																											| (509)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																											|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (409), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																												| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																												|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																													| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																													| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																													|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																												| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																												| (513)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																												|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (421), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																													| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																													|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																													| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																													| (517)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																													|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| Instantiating (517) with all_388_0_172, all_388_1_173, all_388_2_174, all_388_3_175 yields:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| (518) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_388_1_173 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = all_388_0_172 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_0_0) = all_388_2_174 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_388_3_175 & ( ~ (all_388_2_174 = 0) |  ~ (all_388_3_175 = 0) | all_388_0_172 = 0 | all_388_1_173 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (518) yields:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| (519) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_388_3_175
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| (520) distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_0_0) = all_388_2_174
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| (521) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = all_388_0_172
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| (522)  ~ (all_388_2_174 = 0) |  ~ (all_388_3_175 = 0) | all_388_0_172 = 0 | all_388_1_173 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| (523) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_388_1_173
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (425), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| (330) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																															| Equations (330) can reduce 226 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																															| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																															|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| (226)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														| (527)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																														|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (429), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																															| (330) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 19.68/5.29  																																																															|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																																| Equations (330) can reduce 226 to:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																																| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.29  																																																																|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.29  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.29  																																																															| (226)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 19.68/5.29  																																																															| (531)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.29  																																																															|
% 19.68/5.29  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (433), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.29  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																| (330) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Equations (330) can reduce 226 to:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																| (226)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																| (535)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_147_2_87, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_147_2_87, line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (536) all_147_2_87 = all_1_0_0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0, all_318_0_127, all_147_1_86 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_318_0_127, yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (537) all_318_0_127 = all_147_1_86 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_147_1_86)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0, all_143_1_80, all_318_0_127 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_318_0_127, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_143_1_80, yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (538) all_318_0_127 = all_143_1_80
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_318_1_128, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_318_1_128, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (539) all_318_1_128 = all_1_1_1
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_363_0_153, 0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_363_0_153, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (540) all_363_0_153 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_343_0_138, all_388_1_173 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_388_1_173, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_343_0_138, yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (541) all_388_1_173 = all_343_0_138
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_343_0_138, all_358_1_150 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_358_1_150, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_343_0_138, yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (542) all_358_1_150 = all_343_0_138
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_313_0_124, all_363_0_153 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_363_0_153, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_313_0_124, yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (543) all_363_0_153 = all_313_0_124
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_313_0_124, all_343_0_138 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_343_0_138, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_313_0_124, yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (544) all_343_0_138 = all_313_0_124
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_237_0_108, all_358_1_150 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_358_1_150, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_237_0_108, yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (545) all_358_1_150 = all_237_0_108
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_237_1_109, all_388_1_173 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_388_1_173, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_237_1_109, yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (546) all_388_1_173 = all_237_1_109
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Using (359) and (219) yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (547)  ~ (all_237_1_109 = all_22_1_16)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_196_2_93, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = all_196_2_93, distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (548) all_196_2_93 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Combining equations (541,546) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (549) all_343_0_138 = all_237_1_109
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Simplifying 549 yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (550) all_343_0_138 = all_237_1_109
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Combining equations (543,540) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (551) all_313_0_124 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Simplifying 551 yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (552) all_313_0_124 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Combining equations (542,545) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (553) all_343_0_138 = all_237_0_108
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Simplifying 553 yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (554) all_343_0_138 = all_237_0_108
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Combining equations (544,554) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (555) all_313_0_124 = all_237_0_108
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Simplifying 555 yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (556) all_313_0_124 = all_237_0_108
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Combining equations (550,554) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (557) all_237_0_108 = all_237_1_109
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Combining equations (556,552) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (558) all_237_0_108 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Simplifying 558 yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (559) all_237_0_108 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Combining equations (559,557) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (560) all_237_1_109 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Equations (560) can reduce 547 to:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (561)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| Simplifying 561 yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| From (536) and (286) follows:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (563) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_147_1_86
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| From (539) and (449) follows:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (54) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| From (548) and (338) follows:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (348) distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (413), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (122) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| Equations (122) can reduce 48 to:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (48)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	| (569)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																	|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| Instantiating (569) with all_453_0_201, all_453_1_202, all_453_2_203, all_453_3_204 yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| (570) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_453_1_202 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_453_0_201 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = all_453_2_203 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_453_3_204 & ( ~ (all_453_2_203 = 0) |  ~ (all_453_3_204 = 0) | all_453_0_201 = 0 | all_453_1_202 = 0)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (570) yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| (571) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_453_1_202
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| (572) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_453_0_201
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| (573) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_453_3_204
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| (574) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = all_453_2_203
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| (575)  ~ (all_453_2_203 = 0) |  ~ (all_453_3_204 = 0) | all_453_0_201 = 0 | all_453_1_202 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																			| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																			| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																			|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		| (579) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_18_2_11) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																		|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (241), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																			| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																			|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																				| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																				| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																				|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																			| (206)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																			| (583) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																			|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																				| (122) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																				|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																					| Equations (122) can reduce 48 to:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																					| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																					|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																				| (48)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																				| (587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_18_2_11) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_18_2_11) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																				|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (308), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																					| (330) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																					|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						| Equations (330) can reduce 226 to:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																					| (226)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																					| (591)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																					|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						| Instantiating (591) with all_493_0_209, all_493_1_210, all_493_2_211 yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						| (592) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_493_1_210 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_493_0_209 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = all_493_2_211 & ( ~ (all_493_2_211 = 0) | all_493_0_209 = 0 | all_493_1_210 = 0)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (592) yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						| (593) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_493_1_210
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						| (594) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_493_0_209
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						| (595) distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = all_493_2_211
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						| (596)  ~ (all_493_2_211 = 0) | all_493_0_209 = 0 | all_493_1_210 = 0
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (537), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						| (597)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_147_1_86)
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																							| Using (563) and (597) yields:
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																							| (221) $false
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																							|
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.30  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																						| (563) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_147_1_86
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																						| (600) all_318_0_127 = all_147_1_86
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																						|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| Combining equations (538,600) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| (601) all_147_1_86 = all_143_1_80
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| Equations (601) can reduce 321 to:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| (602)  ~ (all_143_1_80 = 0)
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| From (601) and (563) follows:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| (280) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_143_1_80
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0, all_493_1_210, all_143_1_80 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_493_1_210, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_143_1_80, yields:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| (604) all_493_1_210 = all_143_1_80
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0, all_453_1_202, all_493_1_210 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_493_1_210, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = all_453_1_202, yields:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| (605) all_493_1_210 = all_453_1_202
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (21) with all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_493_0_209, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_493_0_209, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| (606) all_493_0_209 = all_1_1_1
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_493_2_211, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = all_493_2_211, distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| (607) all_493_2_211 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| Combining equations (604,605) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| (608) all_453_1_202 = all_143_1_80
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| Combining equations (608,605) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| (604) all_493_1_210 = all_143_1_80
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (250), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| (297) all_32_1_31 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																								| Equations (297) can reduce 237 to:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																								| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																								|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| (237)  ~ (all_32_1_31 = 0)
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							| (613) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																							|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (613), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																								| (122) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																								|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																									| Equations (122) can reduce 48 to:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																									| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																									|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																								| (48)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																								| (617)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																								|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (596), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																									| (618)  ~ (all_493_2_211 = 0)
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																									|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																										| Equations (607) can reduce 618 to:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																										| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																										|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																									| (607) all_493_2_211 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																									| (621) all_493_0_209 = 0 | all_493_1_210 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																									|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (621), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																										| (622) all_493_0_209 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																										|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											| Combining equations (622,606) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											| (122) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											| Equations (122) can reduce 48 to:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																										| (625)  ~ (all_493_0_209 = 0)
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																										| (626) all_493_1_210 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																										|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											| Combining equations (626,604) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											| (627) all_143_1_80 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											| Equations (627) can reduce 602 to:
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											|
% 19.68/5.31  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  																											|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  																											| (629)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 19.68/5.31  																											| (370) all_47_1_43 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																											|
% 19.68/5.31  																												| Equations (370) can reduce 239 to:
% 19.68/5.31  																												| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  																												|
% 19.68/5.31  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  																					|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  																					| (632) all_147_1_86 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																					| (633) all_147_0_85 = 0 & all_52_3_48 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																					|
% 19.68/5.31  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (633) yields:
% 19.68/5.31  																						| (634) all_147_0_85 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																						| (289) all_52_3_48 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  																						|
% 19.68/5.31  																						| Equations (289) can reduce 240 to:
% 19.68/5.31  																						| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  																						|
% 19.68/5.31  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  									|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  									| (637) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0) = all_22_1_16
% 19.68/5.31  									| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  									|
% 19.68/5.31  										| Equations (293) can reduce 206 to:
% 19.68/5.31  										| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  										|
% 19.68/5.31  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  								|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  								| (640) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 19.68/5.31  								| (641)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 19.68/5.31  								|
% 19.68/5.31  									| Instantiating (641) with all_82_0_219, all_82_1_220, all_82_2_221 yields:
% 19.68/5.31  									| (642) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_82_0_219 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_82_1_220 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_82_2_221 & ( ~ (all_82_2_221 = 0) | (all_82_0_219 = 0 & all_82_1_220 = 0))
% 19.68/5.31  									|
% 19.68/5.31  									| Applying alpha-rule on (642) yields:
% 19.68/5.31  									| (643) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_82_0_219
% 19.68/5.31  									| (644) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_82_1_220
% 19.68/5.31  									| (645) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_82_2_221
% 19.68/5.31  									| (646)  ~ (all_82_2_221 = 0) | (all_82_0_219 = 0 & all_82_1_220 = 0)
% 19.68/5.31  									|
% 19.68/5.31  									| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_82_0_219, all_22_0_15 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_82_0_219, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_15, yields:
% 19.68/5.31  									| (647) all_82_0_219 = all_22_0_15
% 19.68/5.31  									|
% 19.68/5.31  									| Using (643) and (56) yields:
% 19.68/5.31  									| (648)  ~ (all_82_0_219 = 0)
% 19.68/5.31  									|
% 19.68/5.31  									| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_82_2_221, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_82_2_221, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 19.68/5.31  									| (649) all_82_2_221 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  									|
% 19.68/5.31  									| Equations (647) can reduce 648 to:
% 19.68/5.31  									| (165)  ~ (all_22_0_15 = 0)
% 19.68/5.31  									|
% 19.68/5.31  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (646), into two cases.
% 19.68/5.31  									|-Branch one:
% 19.68/5.31  									| (651)  ~ (all_82_2_221 = 0)
% 19.68/5.31  									|
% 19.68/5.31  										| Equations (649) can reduce 651 to:
% 19.68/5.31  										| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  										|
% 19.68/5.31  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  									|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  									| (649) all_82_2_221 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  									| (654) all_82_0_219 = 0 & all_82_1_220 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  									|
% 19.68/5.31  										| Applying alpha-rule on (654) yields:
% 19.68/5.31  										| (655) all_82_0_219 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  										| (656) all_82_1_220 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  										|
% 19.68/5.31  										| Combining equations (655,647) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.31  										| (657) all_22_0_15 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  										|
% 19.68/5.31  										| Equations (657) can reduce 165 to:
% 19.68/5.31  										| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  										|
% 19.68/5.31  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  							|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  							| (659) all_34_1_34 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  							| (660) all_34_0_33 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  							|
% 19.68/5.31  								| Combining equations (660,177) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.31  								| (661) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  								|
% 19.68/5.31  								| Equations (661) can reduce 195 to:
% 19.68/5.31  								| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  								|
% 19.68/5.31  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  						|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  						| (663) all_28_1_25 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  						| (664) all_28_0_24 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  						|
% 19.68/5.31  							| Combining equations (186,664) yields a new equation:
% 19.68/5.31  							| (665) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  							|
% 19.68/5.31  							| Simplifying 665 yields:
% 19.68/5.31  							| (661) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  							|
% 19.68/5.31  							| Equations (661) can reduce 195 to:
% 19.68/5.31  							| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  							|
% 19.68/5.31  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  			|-Branch two:
% 19.68/5.31  			| (293) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  			| (657) all_22_0_15 = 0
% 19.68/5.31  			|
% 19.68/5.31  				| Equations (657) can reduce 165 to:
% 19.68/5.31  				| (123) $false
% 19.68/5.31  				|
% 19.68/5.31  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.68/5.31  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 19.68/5.31  
% 19.68/5.31  4722ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------