↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO190+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:21 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 19.75s 19.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 19.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem    : GEO190+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.02/0.10  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 08:40:23 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.51  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 19.70/19.84  %-------------------------------------------
% 19.70/19.84  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 19.70/19.84  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 19.70/19.84  % Transform   :cnf
% 19.70/19.84  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 19.70/19.84  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 19.70/19.84  
% 19.70/19.84  % Result      :Theorem 19.260000s
% 19.70/19.84  % Output      :CNFRefutation 19.260000s
% 19.70/19.84  %-------------------------------------------
% 19.75/19.84  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 19.75/19.84  % File     : GEO190+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 19.75/19.84  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 19.75/19.84  % Problem  : Collary to symmetry of incidence
% 19.75/19.84  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 19.75/19.84  % English  : If X, Y, and Z are pairwise distinct, and Z is incident with
% 19.75/19.84  %            the line connecting X and Y, then Z is incident with the line
% 19.75/19.84  %            connecting Y and X.
% 19.75/19.84  
% 19.75/19.84  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 19.75/19.84  %          : [Li97]  Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 19.75/19.84  %          : [Li98]  Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 19.75/19.84  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 19.75/19.84  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 19.75/19.84  % Names    :
% 19.75/19.84  
% 19.75/19.84  % Status   : Theorem
% 19.75/19.84  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.13 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.29 v5.0.0, 0.15 v4.1.0, 0.17 v4.0.1, 0.21 v4.0.0, 0.25 v3.7.0, 0.29 v3.5.0, 0.25 v3.4.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 19.75/19.84  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 19.75/19.84  %            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
% 19.75/19.84  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
% 19.75/19.84  %            Number of connectives :   31 (   5   ~;   9   |;   5   &)
% 19.75/19.84  %                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 19.75/19.84  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 19.75/19.84  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 19.75/19.84  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 19.75/19.84  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 19.75/19.84  %            Number of variables   :   33 (  33   !;   0   ?)
% 19.75/19.84  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 19.75/19.84  
% 19.75/19.84  % Comments :  Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 19.75/19.84  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 19.75/19.84  include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 19.75/19.84  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 19.75/19.84  fof(con,conjecture,
% 19.75/19.84      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 19.75/19.84        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 19.75/19.84          & distinct_points(X,Z)
% 19.75/19.84          & distinct_points(Y,Z)
% 19.75/19.84          & ~ apart_point_and_line(Z,line_connecting(X,Y)) )
% 19.75/19.84       => ~ apart_point_and_line(Z,line_connecting(Y,X)) ) ).
% 19.75/19.84  
% 19.75/19.84  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 19.75/19.84  %-------------------------------------------
% 19.75/19.84  % Proof found
% 19.75/19.84  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 19.75/19.84  % SZS output start Proof
% 19.75/19.85  %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:0)
% 19.75/19.85  %VarNum:80(SingletonVarNum:36)
% 19.75/19.85  %MaxLitNum:6
% 19.75/19.85  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 19.75/19.85  %SharedTerms:10
% 19.75/19.85  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 8
% 19.75/19.85  %singleGoalClaCount:5
% 19.75/19.85  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 19.75/19.85  [2]P1(a1,a3)
% 19.75/19.85  [3]P1(a2,a3)
% 19.75/19.85  [4]P2(a3,f4(a2,a1))
% 19.75/19.85  [8]~P2(a3,f4(a1,a2))
% 19.75/19.85  [5]~P1(x51,x51)
% 19.75/19.85  [6]~P3(x61,x61)
% 19.75/19.85  [7]~P4(x71,x71)
% 19.75/19.85  [9]~P4(x91,x92)+P3(x91,x92)
% 19.75/19.85  [10]~P1(x103,x101)+P1(x101,x102)+P1(x103,x102)
% 19.75/19.85  [11]~P2(x111,x113)+P1(x111,x112)+P2(x112,x113)
% 19.75/19.85  [12]~P3(x123,x121)+P3(x121,x122)+P3(x123,x122)
% 19.75/19.85  [13]~P2(x133,x131)+P3(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x132)
% 19.75/19.85  [14]~P4(x143,x141)+P4(x141,x142)+P4(x143,x142)
% 19.75/19.85  [15]~P4(x152,x153)+~P2(x151,x153)+P1(x151,f5(x152,x153))
% 19.75/19.85  [16]~P4(x162,x163)+~P2(x161,x162)+P1(x161,f5(x162,x163))
% 19.75/19.85  [17]P1(x171,x172)+~P1(x173,x172)+~P2(x171,f4(x173,x172))
% 19.75/19.85  [18]P1(x181,x182)+~P1(x182,x183)+~P2(x181,f4(x182,x183))
% 19.75/19.85  [19]P2(x194,x193)+~P1(x194,x191)+~P3(x193,x192)+P2(x191,x192)+P2(x191,x193)+P2(x194,x192)
% 19.75/19.85  %EqnAxiom
% 19.75/19.85  
% 19.75/19.85  %-------------------------------------------
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(20,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (P1(a2,a1)),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,10])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(25,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (P1(a3,a1)),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,8,5,10,13,17])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(27,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (P1(a3,a2)),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,8,5,10,13,17,18])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(64,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a3,f4(a1,a3))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,10,17])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(67,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a2,f4(a3,a2))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,5,10,17])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(68,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a1,f4(a1,a3))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,2,10,18])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(69,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a3,f4(a2,a3))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,5,10,17])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(72,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a2,f4(a1,a2))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,10,17])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(73,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a1,f4(a3,a1))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,10,17])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(88,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a2,f4(a2,a3))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,5,18,10])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(89,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a1,f4(a1,a2))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,18,11])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(90,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a3,f4(a3,a1))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,4,20,18,17])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(91,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (P3(f4(a2,a1),f4(a3,a1))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,90,13])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(99,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a3,f4(a3,a2))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[27,5,18,11])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(103,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (P1(a2,x1031)+~P2(a3,f4(a3,x1031))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,27,18,10])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(105,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P3(f4(a3,a2),f4(a1,a2))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,3,99,67,72,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(108,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a1,f4(a3,a2))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[89,105,13])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(110,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P3(f4(a1,a3),f4(a1,a2))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,2,68,89,105,64,13,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(115,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a2,f4(a1,a3))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[110,72,13])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(117,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P3(f4(a2,a3),f4(a1,a2))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,3,110,88,69,72,13,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(121,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P3(f4(a3,a1),f4(a3,a2))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,2,73,90,108,103,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(124,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a2,f4(a3,a1))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[121,67,9,13])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(126,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P3(f4(a1,a2),f4(a1,a3))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,25,121,68,67,89,64,9,13,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(131,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P2(a1,f4(a2,a3))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[117,126,89,9,13])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(133,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P3(f4(a3,a1),f4(a1,a2))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,2,117,126,73,90,89,9,13,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(137,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P3(f4(a2,a3),f4(a3,a1))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,133,124,131,73,88,9,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(147,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P3(f4(a1,a2),f4(a2,a3))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,25,131,137,69,89,9,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(151,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P3(f4(a2,a3),f4(a1,a3))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,147,115,131,68,88,9,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(155,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P3(f4(a3,a2),f4(a3,a1))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,151,124,108,73,67,9,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(159,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P3(f4(a1,a2),f4(a3,a1))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,155,25,90,73,89,9,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(163,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (~P3(f4(a3,a1),f4(a2,a3))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[159,20,124,131,88,73,9,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(193,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (P3(f4(a3,a1),f4(a2,a1))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[91,6,12])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(918,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (P2(a2,f4(a2,a1))+P2(a1,f4(a2,a1))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[163,193,88,1,131,12,19])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(919,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     (P2(a2,f4(a2,a1))),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,5,918,17])).
% 19.78/19.85  cnf(920,plain,
% 19.78/19.85     ($false),
% 19.78/19.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,919,20,18]),
% 19.78/19.85     ['proof']).
% 19.78/19.85  % SZS output end Proof
% 19.78/19.85  % Total time :19.260000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------