↑ Up

ePrincess---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO191+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.65s 2.00s
% Output   : Proof 27.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : GEO191+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 15:15:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.58          ____       _                          
% 0.19/0.58    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.19/0.58   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.19/0.58  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.19/0.58  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.19/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.19/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.19/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.19/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.19/0.58  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.72/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.65/0.93  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.00/1.07  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.00/1.09  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.13/1.40  Prover 0: gave up
% 3.13/1.40  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.13/1.43  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.57/1.51  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.69/1.56  Prover 1: gave up
% 3.69/1.56  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.69/1.58  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 4.39/1.69  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.39/1.70  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.65/2.00  Prover 2: proved (442ms)
% 5.65/2.00  
% 5.65/2.00  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 5.65/2.00  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 5.65/2.00  
% 5.65/2.00  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 26.06/9.29  found it (size 731)
% 26.06/9.29  
% 26.06/9.29  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 26.06/9.29  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 26.06/9.29  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ( ~ (v9 = 0) &  ~ (v8 = 0) & intersection_point(v2, v3) = v7 & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v7, v1) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v7, v0) = v8 & convergent_lines(v2, v3) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v12, v13) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v12, v13) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_points(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) | apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) | apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) | convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_points(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_points(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (intersection_point(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (intersection_point(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (line_connecting(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (line_connecting(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (distinct_points(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_points(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v12, v13) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v12, v10) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v12, v10) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v10) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v10) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v10) = 0) &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : intersection_point(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : line_connecting(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : apart_point_and_line(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : convergent_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : distinct_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : distinct_points(v11, v10) = v12 & ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v4, v3) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v4, v2) = 0)))
% 26.06/9.35  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 yields:
% 26.06/9.35  | (1)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2 & intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_5_5 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : intersection_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : line_connecting(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : apart_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : convergent_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_points(v1, v0) = v2 & ((all_0_3_3 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0))
% 26.06/9.37  |
% 26.06/9.37  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 26.06/9.37  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 26.06/9.37  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 26.06/9.37  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 26.06/9.37  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 26.06/9.37  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 26.06/9.37  | (7) intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2
% 26.06/9.37  | (8)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : convergent_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 26.06/9.37  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 26.06/9.37  | (10)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 26.06/9.37  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 26.06/9.37  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 26.06/9.37  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 26.06/9.37  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 26.06/9.37  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 26.06/9.37  | (16)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_points(v1, v0) = v2
% 26.06/9.37  | (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.06/9.37  | (18) intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_5_5
% 26.06/9.37  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)))
% 26.06/9.37  | (20) (all_0_3_3 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0)
% 26.06/9.37  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 26.06/9.37  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3))
% 26.06/9.37  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 26.06/9.38  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 26.06/9.38  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 26.06/9.38  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 26.06/9.38  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 26.06/9.38  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 26.06/9.38  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 26.06/9.38  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 26.06/9.38  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 26.06/9.38  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 26.06/9.38  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3))
% 26.06/9.38  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 26.06/9.38  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 26.48/9.38  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 26.48/9.38  | (37) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0
% 26.48/9.38  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 26.48/9.38  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 26.48/9.38  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 26.48/9.38  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 26.48/9.38  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 26.48/9.38  | (43)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : apart_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2
% 26.48/9.38  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3))
% 26.48/9.38  | (45)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : intersection_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 26.48/9.38  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 26.48/9.38  | (47)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 26.48/9.39  | (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.48/9.39  | (49) convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 26.48/9.39  | (50)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : line_connecting(v1, v0) = v2
% 26.48/9.39  | (51) convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 26.48/9.39  | (52)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6)))
% 26.48/9.39  | (53)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 26.48/9.39  | (54)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 26.48/9.39  | (55)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 26.48/9.39  | (56) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1
% 26.48/9.39  | (57)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6)))
% 26.53/9.39  | (58)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 26.53/9.39  |
% 26.53/9.39  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 26.53/9.39  | (59)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 26.53/9.39  |
% 26.53/9.39  | Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 26.53/9.39  | (60)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 26.53/9.39  |
% 26.53/9.39  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 26.53/9.39  | (61)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 26.53/9.39  |
% 26.53/9.39  | Instantiating formula (13) with all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 26.53/9.39  | (62)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 26.53/9.39  |
% 26.53/9.39  | Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_0_0, all_0_0_0, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 26.53/9.39  | (63) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.39  |
% 26.53/9.39  | Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_1_1, all_0_0_0, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 26.53/9.39  | (64) all_0_0_0 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (65) all_0_0_0 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (66) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating formula (22) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (67)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_0_6_6) = v1)
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating formula (33) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (68)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_0_7_7) = v1)
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating formula (22) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (69)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_0_8_8) = v1)
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating formula (33) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (70)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_0_9_9) = v1)
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating (70) with all_20_0_28, all_20_1_29 yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (71)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_20_1_29 & apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_29, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Applying alpha-rule on (71) yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.53/9.40  | (73) intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_20_1_29
% 26.53/9.40  | (74) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_29, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating (62) with all_22_0_30 yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (75) ( ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_22_0_30) | ( ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_22_0_30)
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating (61) with all_23_0_31 yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (76) ( ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31) | ( ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31)
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating (59) with all_24_0_32 yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (77) ( ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32) | ( ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32)
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating (60) with all_25_0_33 yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (78) ( ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33) | ( ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_25_0_33)
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating (69) with all_26_0_34, all_26_1_35 yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (79)  ~ (all_26_0_34 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_26_1_35 & apart_point_and_line(all_26_1_35, all_0_8_8) = all_26_0_34
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Applying alpha-rule on (79) yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (80)  ~ (all_26_0_34 = 0)
% 26.53/9.40  | (81) intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_26_1_35
% 26.53/9.40  | (82) apart_point_and_line(all_26_1_35, all_0_8_8) = all_26_0_34
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating (67) with all_28_0_36, all_28_1_37 yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (83)  ~ (all_28_0_36 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_28_1_37 & apart_point_and_line(all_28_1_37, all_0_6_6) = all_28_0_36
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Applying alpha-rule on (83) yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (84)  ~ (all_28_0_36 = 0)
% 26.53/9.40  | (85) intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_28_1_37
% 26.53/9.40  | (86) apart_point_and_line(all_28_1_37, all_0_6_6) = all_28_0_36
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Instantiating (68) with all_30_0_38, all_30_1_39 yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (87)  ~ (all_30_0_38 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_30_1_39 & apart_point_and_line(all_30_1_39, all_0_7_7) = all_30_0_38
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  | Applying alpha-rule on (87) yields:
% 26.53/9.40  | (88)  ~ (all_30_0_38 = 0)
% 26.53/9.40  | (89) intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_30_1_39
% 26.53/9.40  | (90) apart_point_and_line(all_30_1_39, all_0_7_7) = all_30_0_38
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (75), into two cases.
% 26.53/9.40  |-Branch one:
% 26.53/9.40  | (91)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_22_0_30
% 26.53/9.40  |
% 26.53/9.40  	| Applying alpha-rule on (91) yields:
% 26.53/9.40  	| (92)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 26.53/9.40  	| (93) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_22_0_30
% 26.53/9.40  	|
% 26.53/9.40  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (76), into two cases.
% 26.53/9.40  	|-Branch one:
% 26.53/9.40  	| (94)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31
% 26.53/9.40  	|
% 26.53/9.40  		| Applying alpha-rule on (94) yields:
% 26.53/9.40  		| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.53/9.40  		| (96) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31
% 26.53/9.40  		|
% 26.53/9.40  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (77), into two cases.
% 26.53/9.40  		|-Branch one:
% 26.53/9.40  		| (97)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32
% 26.53/9.40  		|
% 26.53/9.40  			| Applying alpha-rule on (97) yields:
% 26.53/9.40  			| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.53/9.40  			| (99) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32
% 26.53/9.40  			|
% 26.53/9.40  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (66), into two cases.
% 26.53/9.40  			|-Branch one:
% 26.53/9.40  			| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.53/9.40  			|
% 26.53/9.41  				| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.53/9.41  				| (101) $false
% 26.53/9.41  				|
% 26.53/9.41  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.53/9.41  			|-Branch two:
% 26.53/9.41  			| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.53/9.41  			| (103)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.41  			|
% 26.53/9.41  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (78), into two cases.
% 26.53/9.41  				|-Branch one:
% 26.53/9.41  				| (104)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33
% 26.53/9.41  				|
% 26.53/9.41  					| Applying alpha-rule on (104) yields:
% 26.53/9.41  					| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.53/9.41  					| (106) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33
% 26.53/9.41  					|
% 26.53/9.41  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (63), into two cases.
% 26.53/9.41  					|-Branch one:
% 26.53/9.41  					| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.53/9.41  					|
% 26.53/9.41  						| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.53/9.41  						| (101) $false
% 26.53/9.41  						|
% 26.53/9.41  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.53/9.41  					|-Branch two:
% 26.53/9.41  					| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.53/9.41  					| (110)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.41  					|
% 26.53/9.41  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (64), into two cases.
% 26.53/9.41  						|-Branch one:
% 26.53/9.41  						| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.53/9.41  						|
% 26.53/9.41  							| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.53/9.41  							| (101) $false
% 26.53/9.41  							|
% 26.53/9.41  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.53/9.41  						|-Branch two:
% 26.53/9.41  						| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.53/9.41  						| (114) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.41  						|
% 26.53/9.41  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (65), into two cases.
% 26.53/9.41  							|-Branch one:
% 26.53/9.41  							| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.53/9.41  							|
% 26.53/9.41  								| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.53/9.41  								| (101) $false
% 26.53/9.41  								|
% 26.53/9.41  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.53/9.41  							|-Branch two:
% 26.53/9.41  							| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.53/9.41  							| (118) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.41  							|
% 26.53/9.41  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (114), into two cases.
% 26.53/9.41  								|-Branch one:
% 26.53/9.41  								| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.53/9.41  								|
% 26.53/9.41  									| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.53/9.41  									| (101) $false
% 26.53/9.41  									|
% 26.53/9.41  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.53/9.41  								|-Branch two:
% 26.53/9.41  								| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.53/9.41  								| (122)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.41  								|
% 26.53/9.41  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (118), into two cases.
% 26.53/9.41  									|-Branch one:
% 26.53/9.41  									| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.53/9.41  									|
% 26.53/9.41  										| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (101) $false
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.53/9.41  									|-Branch two:
% 26.53/9.41  									| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.53/9.41  									| (126)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.41  									|
% 26.53/9.41  										| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_30_1_39, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_30_1_39, intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (127) all_30_1_39 = all_0_2_2
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_28_1_37, all_30_1_39 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_30_1_39, intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_28_1_37, yields:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (128) all_30_1_39 = all_28_1_37
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_26_1_35, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_26_1_35, intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (129) all_26_1_35 = all_0_5_5
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_20_1_29, all_26_1_35 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_26_1_35, intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_20_1_29, yields:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (130) all_26_1_35 = all_20_1_29
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										| Combining equations (127,128) yields a new equation:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (131) all_28_1_37 = all_0_2_2
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										| Combining equations (130,129) yields a new equation:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (132) all_20_1_29 = all_0_5_5
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										| Simplifying 132 yields:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (133) all_20_1_29 = all_0_5_5
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										| Combining equations (131,128) yields a new equation:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (127) all_30_1_39 = all_0_2_2
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										| From (127) and (90) follows:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (135) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_30_0_38
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										| From (131) and (86) follows:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (136) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_28_0_36
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										| From (129) and (82) follows:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (137) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_26_0_34
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										| From (133) and (74) follows:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (138) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28
% 26.53/9.41  										|
% 26.53/9.41  										| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_28_0_36, all_24_0_32 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_28_0_36, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, yields:
% 26.53/9.41  										| (139) all_28_0_36 = all_24_0_32
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_30_0_38, all_25_0_33 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_30_0_38, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, yields:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (140) all_30_0_38 = all_25_0_33
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_26_0_34, all_23_0_31 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_26_0_34, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (141) all_26_0_34 = all_23_0_31
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_20_0_28, all_22_0_30 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (142) all_22_0_30 = all_20_0_28
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Equations (140) can reduce 88 to:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Equations (139) can reduce 84 to:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Equations (141) can reduce 80 to:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Equations (142) can reduce 92 to:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| From (139) and (136) follows:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (99) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| From (140) and (135) follows:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (106) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| From (141) and (137) follows:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (96) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| From (142) and (93) follows:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (138) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_24_0_32, all_0_0_0, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (151) all_24_0_32 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_0_0, all_24_0_32, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (152) all_24_0_32 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_24_0_32, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (153) all_24_0_32 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_1_1, all_24_0_32, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (154) all_24_0_32 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_24_0_32, all_24_0_32, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, yields:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (155) all_24_0_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_25_0_33, all_0_0_0, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (156) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_0_0, all_25_0_33, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (157) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_25_0_33, all_0_1_1, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (158) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_1_1, all_25_0_33, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 26.53/9.42  										| (159) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.53/9.42  										|
% 26.53/9.42  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_25_0_33, all_24_0_32, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, yields:
% 26.71/9.43  										| (160) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_24_0_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.71/9.43  										|
% 26.71/9.43  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_24_0_32, all_25_0_33, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, yields:
% 26.71/9.43  										| (161) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_24_0_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.71/9.43  										|
% 26.71/9.43  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_25_0_33, all_25_0_33, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, yields:
% 26.71/9.43  										| (162) all_25_0_33 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.71/9.43  										|
% 26.71/9.43  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_23_0_31, all_0_0_0, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.71/9.43  										| (163) all_23_0_31 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.71/9.43  										|
% 26.71/9.43  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_0_0, all_23_0_31, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.71/9.43  										| (164) all_23_0_31 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.71/9.43  										|
% 26.71/9.43  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_23_0_31, all_0_1_1, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.71/9.43  										| (165) all_23_0_31 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.71/9.43  										|
% 26.71/9.43  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_1_1, all_23_0_31, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.71/9.43  										| (166) all_23_0_31 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.71/9.43  										|
% 26.71/9.43  										| Instantiating formula (30) with all_23_0_31, all_0_1_1, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.71/9.43  										| (167) all_23_0_31 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.43  										|
% 26.74/9.43  										| Instantiating formula (30) with all_0_1_1, all_23_0_31, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.74/9.43  										| (168) all_23_0_31 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.43  										|
% 26.74/9.43  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_23_0_31, all_24_0_32, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.74/9.43  										| (169) all_24_0_32 = 0 | all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_24_0_32, all_23_0_31, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (170) all_24_0_32 = 0 | all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (30) with all_23_0_31, all_24_0_32, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (171) all_24_0_32 = 0 | all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (30) with all_24_0_32, all_23_0_31, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (172) all_24_0_32 = 0 | all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_23_0_31, all_25_0_33, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (173) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_25_0_33, all_23_0_31, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (174) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (30) with all_23_0_31, all_25_0_33, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (175) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (30) with all_25_0_33, all_23_0_31, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (176) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_23_0_31, all_23_0_31, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (177) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_20_0_28, all_0_0_0, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (178) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_0_0, all_20_0_28, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (179) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (30) with all_20_0_28, all_0_0_0, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (180) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (30) with all_0_0_0, all_20_0_28, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (181) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.44  										|
% 26.74/9.44  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_20_0_28, all_0_1_1, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.44  										| (182) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_1_1, all_20_0_28, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (183) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_20_0_28, all_24_0_32, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (184) all_24_0_32 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_24_0_32, all_20_0_28, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (185) all_24_0_32 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										| Instantiating formula (30) with all_20_0_28, all_24_0_32, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (186) all_24_0_32 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										| Instantiating formula (30) with all_24_0_32, all_20_0_28, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (187) all_24_0_32 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_20_0_28, all_25_0_33, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (188) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_25_0_33, all_20_0_28, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (189) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										| Instantiating formula (30) with all_20_0_28, all_25_0_33, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (190) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										| Instantiating formula (30) with all_25_0_33, all_20_0_28, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (191) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_20_0_28, all_23_0_31, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (192) all_23_0_31 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_23_0_31, all_20_0_28, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (193) all_23_0_31 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										| Instantiating formula (38) with all_20_0_28, all_20_0_28, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (194) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (20), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.45  										|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.45  										| (195) all_0_3_3 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 26.74/9.45  										|
% 26.74/9.45  											| Applying alpha-rule on (195) yields:
% 26.74/9.45  											| (196) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 26.74/9.45  											| (197) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 26.74/9.45  											|
% 26.74/9.45  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (162), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.45  											|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.45  											| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.45  											|
% 26.74/9.45  												| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.45  												| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.45  												|
% 26.74/9.45  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.45  											|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.45  											| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.45  											| (201)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  											|
% 26.74/9.45  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (155), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.45  												|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.45  												| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.45  												|
% 26.74/9.45  													| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.45  													| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.45  													|
% 26.74/9.45  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.45  												|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.45  												| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.45  												| (205)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.45  												|
% 26.74/9.45  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (177), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.45  													|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  													| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  													|
% 26.74/9.46  														| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.46  														| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  														|
% 26.74/9.46  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  													|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  													| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  													| (209)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  													|
% 26.74/9.46  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  														|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  														| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  														|
% 26.74/9.46  															| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.46  															| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  															|
% 26.74/9.46  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  														|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  														| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  														| (213)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  														|
% 26.74/9.46  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (175), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  															|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  															| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  															|
% 26.74/9.46  																| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																|
% 26.74/9.46  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  															|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  															| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  															| (217) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  															|
% 26.74/9.46  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (176), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																|
% 26.74/9.46  																	| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																	| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																	|
% 26.74/9.46  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																| (221) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																|
% 26.74/9.46  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (187), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																	|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																	| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																	|
% 26.74/9.46  																		| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																		| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																		|
% 26.74/9.46  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																	|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																	| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																	| (225) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																	|
% 26.74/9.46  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																		|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																		| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																		|
% 26.74/9.46  																			| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																			| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																			|
% 26.74/9.46  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																		|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																		| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																		| (229) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																		|
% 26.74/9.46  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																			|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																			| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																			|
% 26.74/9.46  																				| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																				| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																				|
% 26.74/9.46  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																			|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																			| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																			| (233) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																			|
% 26.74/9.46  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (151), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																				|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																				| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																				|
% 26.74/9.46  																					| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																					| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																					|
% 26.74/9.46  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																				|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																				| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																				| (237) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																				|
% 26.74/9.46  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (159), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																					|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																					| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																					|
% 26.74/9.46  																						| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																						| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																						|
% 26.74/9.46  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																					|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																					| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																					| (241) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																					|
% 26.74/9.46  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (160), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																						|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																						| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																						|
% 26.74/9.46  																							| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																							| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																							|
% 26.74/9.46  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																						|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																						| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																						| (245) all_24_0_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																						|
% 26.74/9.46  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (192), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																							|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																							| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																							|
% 26.74/9.46  																								| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																								| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																								|
% 26.74/9.46  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																							|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																							| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																							| (249) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																							|
% 26.74/9.46  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (152), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																								|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																								| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																								|
% 26.74/9.46  																									| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																									| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																									|
% 26.74/9.46  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																								|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																								| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																								| (253) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																								|
% 26.74/9.46  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (153), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																									|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																									| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																									|
% 26.74/9.46  																										| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																										| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																										|
% 26.74/9.46  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																									|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																									| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																									| (257) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																									|
% 26.74/9.46  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (154), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																										|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																										| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																										|
% 26.74/9.46  																											| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																											| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																											|
% 26.74/9.46  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																										|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																										| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																										| (261) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																										|
% 26.74/9.46  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (156), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																											|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																											| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																											|
% 26.74/9.46  																												| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																												| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																												|
% 26.74/9.46  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																											|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																											| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																											| (265) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																											|
% 26.74/9.46  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (157), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																												|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																												| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																												|
% 26.74/9.46  																													| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																													| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																													|
% 26.74/9.46  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																												|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																												| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																												| (269) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.46  																												|
% 26.74/9.46  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (183), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.46  																													|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.46  																													| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.46  																													|
% 26.74/9.46  																														| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.46  																														| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.46  																														|
% 26.74/9.46  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.46  																													|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.46  																													| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.46  																													| (273) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																													|
% 26.74/9.47  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (171), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																														|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																														| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																														|
% 26.74/9.47  																															| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																															| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																															|
% 26.74/9.47  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																														|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																														| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																														| (277) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																														|
% 26.74/9.47  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (184), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																															|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																															| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																															|
% 26.74/9.47  																																| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																|
% 26.74/9.47  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																															|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																															| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																															| (281) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																															|
% 26.74/9.47  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (158), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																|
% 26.74/9.47  																																	| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																	| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																	|
% 26.74/9.47  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																| (285) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																|
% 26.74/9.47  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (185), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																	|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																	| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																	|
% 26.74/9.47  																																		| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																		| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																		|
% 26.74/9.47  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																	|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																	| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																	| (289) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																	|
% 26.74/9.47  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (186), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																		|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																		| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																		|
% 26.74/9.47  																																			| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																			| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																			|
% 26.74/9.47  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																		|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																		| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																		| (293) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																		|
% 26.74/9.47  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (189), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																			|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																			| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																			|
% 26.74/9.47  																																				| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																				| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																				|
% 26.74/9.47  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																			|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																			| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																			| (297) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																			|
% 26.74/9.47  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (190), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																				|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																				| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																				|
% 26.74/9.47  																																					| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																					| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																					|
% 26.74/9.47  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																				|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																				| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																				| (301) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																				|
% 26.74/9.47  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (172), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																					|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																					| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																					|
% 26.74/9.47  																																						| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																						| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																						|
% 26.74/9.47  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																					|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																					| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																					| (305) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																					|
% 26.74/9.47  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (178), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																						|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																						| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																						|
% 26.74/9.47  																																							| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																							| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																							|
% 26.74/9.47  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																						|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																						| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																						| (309) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																						|
% 26.74/9.47  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (181), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																							|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																							| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																							|
% 26.74/9.47  																																								| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																								| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																								|
% 26.74/9.47  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																							|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																							| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																							| (313) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																							|
% 26.74/9.47  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (179), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																								|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																								| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																								|
% 26.74/9.47  																																									| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																									| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																									|
% 26.74/9.47  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																								|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																								| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																								| (317) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																								|
% 26.74/9.47  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (180), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																									|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																									| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																									|
% 26.74/9.47  																																										| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																										| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																										|
% 26.74/9.47  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																									|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																									| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																									| (321) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																									|
% 26.74/9.47  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (182), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																										|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																										| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																										|
% 26.74/9.47  																																											| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																											| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																											|
% 26.74/9.47  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																										|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																										| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																										| (325) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																										|
% 26.74/9.47  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (193), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																											|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																											| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																											|
% 26.74/9.47  																																												| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																												| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																												|
% 26.74/9.47  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																											|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																											| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																											| (329) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																											|
% 26.74/9.47  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (167), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																												|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																												| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																												|
% 26.74/9.47  																																													| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																													| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																													|
% 26.74/9.47  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																												|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																												| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																												| (333) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																												|
% 26.74/9.47  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (168), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																													|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																													| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																													|
% 26.74/9.47  																																														| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																														| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																														|
% 26.74/9.47  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																													|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																													| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																													| (337) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																													|
% 26.74/9.47  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (169), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																														|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																														| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																														|
% 26.74/9.47  																																															| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																															| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																															|
% 26.74/9.47  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																														|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																														| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																														| (341) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																														|
% 26.74/9.47  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (170), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																															|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																															| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																															|
% 26.74/9.47  																																																| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																																| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.47  																																																|
% 26.74/9.47  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.47  																																															|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.47  																																															| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.47  																																															| (345) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.47  																																															|
% 26.74/9.47  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (173), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.47  																																																|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.47  																																																| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.47  																																																|
% 26.74/9.47  																																																	| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.47  																																																	| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																	|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																| (349) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (174), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																	| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																	|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																		| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																		| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																		|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																	| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																	| (353) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																	|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (161), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																		| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																		|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																			| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																			| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																			|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																		| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																		| (357) all_24_0_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																		|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (165), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																			| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																			|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																				| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																				| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																				|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																			| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																			| (361) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																			|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (163), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																				| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																				|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																					| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																					| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																					|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																				| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																				| (365) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																				|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (164), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																					| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																					|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																						| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																						| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																						|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																					| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																					| (369) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																					|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (166), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																						| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																						|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																							| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																							| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																							|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																						| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																						| (373) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																						|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																							| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																							|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																								| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																								| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																								|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																							| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																							| (377)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																							|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																								| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																								|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																									| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																									| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																									|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																								| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																								| (381)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																								|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																									| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																									|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																										| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																										| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																										|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																									| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																									| (385)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																									|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																										| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																										|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																											| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																											| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																											|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																										| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																										| (389)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																										|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																											| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																											|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																												| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																												| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																												|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																											| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																											| (393)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																											|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (237), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																												| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																												|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																													| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																													| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																													|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																												| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																												| (397)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																												|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (241), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																													| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																													|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																														| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																														| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																														|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																													| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																													| (401)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																													|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (245), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																														| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																														|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																															| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																															| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																															|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																														| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																														| (405)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																														|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (249), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																															| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																															|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																															| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																															| (409)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																															|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (253), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																	| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																	| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																	|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																| (413)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (257), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																	| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																	|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																		| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																		| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																		|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																	| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																	| (417)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																	|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (261), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																		| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																		|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																			| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																			| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																		| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																		| (421)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																		|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (265), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																			| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																				| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																				| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																			| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																			| (425)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (269), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																				| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																					| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																					| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.48  																																																																				| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																				| (429)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (273), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																					| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																						| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																						| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																						|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																					| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																					| (433)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (277), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																						| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																						|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																							| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																							| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																							|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																						| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																						| (437)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																						|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (281), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																							| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																							|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																								| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																								| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																								|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																							| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																							| (441)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																							|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																								| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																								|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																									| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																									| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																									|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																								| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																								| (445)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																								|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																									| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																									|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																										| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																										| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																										|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																									| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																									| (449)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																									|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (293), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																										| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																										|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																											| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																											| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																											|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																										| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																										| (453)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																										|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (297), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																											| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																											|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																												| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																												| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																												|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																											| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																											| (457)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																											|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																												| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																												|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																													| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																													| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																													|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																												| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																												| (461)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																												|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (305), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																													| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																													|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																														| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																														| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																														|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																													| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																													| (465)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																													|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (309), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																														| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																														|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																															| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																															| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																															|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																														| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																														| (469)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																														|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (313), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																															| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																															|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																															| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																															| (473)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																															|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																| Instantiating (473) with all_324_0_72 yields:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																| (474) (all_324_0_72 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_324_0_72 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (all_324_0_72 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_72) | ( ~ (all_324_0_72 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_324_0_72)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (317), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																	| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																	| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																	|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																| (478)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (321), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																	| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																	|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																		| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																		| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																		|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																	| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																	| (482)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																	|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (325), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																		| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																		|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																			| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																			| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																		| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																		| (486)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																		|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (329), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																			| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																				| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																				| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																			| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																			| (490)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (333), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																				| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																					| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																					| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																				| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																				| (494)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (337), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																					| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																						| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																						| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																						|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																					| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																					| (498)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (341), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																						| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																						|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																							| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																							| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																							|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																						| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																						| (502)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																						|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (345), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																							| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																							|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																								| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																								| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																								|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																							| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																							| (506)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																							|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (349), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																								| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																								|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																									| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																									| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																									|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																								| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																								| (510)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																								|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (353), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																									| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																									|
% 26.74/9.49  																																																																																										| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																										| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																										|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																									| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																									| (514)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																									|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (357), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																										| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																										|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																											| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																											| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																											|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																										| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																										| (518)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																										|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (361), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																											| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																											|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																												| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																												| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																												|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																											| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																											| (522)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																											|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (365), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																												| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																												|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																													| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																													| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																													|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																												| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																												| (526)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																												|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (369), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																													| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																													|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																														| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																														| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																														|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																													| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																													| (530)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																													|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (373), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																														| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																														|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																														| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																														| (534)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																														|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															| Instantiating (534) with all_384_0_87 yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															| (535) (all_384_0_87 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (all_384_0_87 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (all_384_0_87 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_384_0_87) | ( ~ (all_384_0_87 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_384_0_87)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (34) with all_24_0_32, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															| (536) all_24_0_32 = 0 | distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (536), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															| (537) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																															|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (474), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																| (538) (all_324_0_72 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_324_0_72 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (all_324_0_72 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_72)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (538), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																	| (539) (all_324_0_72 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_324_0_72 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																	|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (539), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		| (540) all_324_0_72 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (540) yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| (541) all_324_0_72 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| (542) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, 0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		| (545) all_324_0_72 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (545) yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| (541) all_324_0_72 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| (547) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, 0, all_23_0_31 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																	| (550)  ~ (all_324_0_72 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_72
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																	|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (550) yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		| (551)  ~ (all_324_0_72 = 0)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		| (552) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_72
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		| (553) (all_384_0_87 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (all_384_0_87 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (all_384_0_87 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_384_0_87)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																		|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (553), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| (554) (all_384_0_87 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (all_384_0_87 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (554), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| (555) all_384_0_87 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (555) yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| (556) all_384_0_87 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| (557) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| (560) all_384_0_87 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (560) yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| (556) all_384_0_87 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| (562) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, 0, all_20_0_28 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| (101) $false
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			| (565)  ~ (all_384_0_87 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_384_0_87
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																			|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (565) yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| (566)  ~ (all_384_0_87 = 0)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| (567) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_384_0_87
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (39) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_324_0_72, all_384_0_87 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_384_0_87, distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_72, yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| (568) all_384_0_87 = all_324_0_72
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| Equations (568) can reduce 566 to:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| (551)  ~ (all_324_0_72 = 0)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| From (568) and (567) follows:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| (552) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_72
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (6) with all_324_0_72, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_72, yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| (571) all_324_0_72 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (571), into two cases.
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| (572) convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (32) with all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					| (573) $false
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					|
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| (574)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				| (541) all_324_0_72 = 0
% 26.74/9.50  																																																																																																				|
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																					| Equations (541) can reduce 551 to:
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																					| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																					|
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																		| (577)  ~ (all_384_0_87 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_384_0_87
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (577) yields:
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																			| (566)  ~ (all_384_0_87 = 0)
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																			| (579) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_384_0_87
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_384_0_87 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_384_0_87, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																			| (556) all_384_0_87 = 0
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																			| Equations (556) can reduce 566 to:
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																			| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.50  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																| (582)  ~ (all_324_0_72 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_324_0_72
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																|
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (582) yields:
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																	| (551)  ~ (all_324_0_72 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																	| (584) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_324_0_72
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_324_0_72 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_324_0_72, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																	| (541) all_324_0_72 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																	| Equations (541) can reduce 551 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																	| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																															| (587)  ~ (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																															| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																															|
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																|
% 27.09/9.51  																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  										|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  										| (590) all_0_4_4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 27.09/9.51  										|
% 27.09/9.51  											| Applying alpha-rule on (590) yields:
% 27.09/9.51  											| (591) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  											| (592) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 27.09/9.51  											|
% 27.09/9.51  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (162), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  											|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  											| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  											|
% 27.09/9.51  												| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.51  												| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  												|
% 27.09/9.51  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  											|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  											| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  											| (201)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  											|
% 27.09/9.51  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (155), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  												|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  												| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  												|
% 27.09/9.51  													| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.51  													| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  													|
% 27.09/9.51  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  												|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  												| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  												| (205)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  												|
% 27.09/9.51  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (177), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  													|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  													| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  													|
% 27.09/9.51  														| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.51  														| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  														|
% 27.09/9.51  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  													|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  													| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  													| (209)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  													|
% 27.09/9.51  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  														|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  														| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  														|
% 27.09/9.51  															| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.51  															| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  															|
% 27.09/9.51  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  														|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  														| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  														| (213)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  														|
% 27.09/9.51  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (175), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  															|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  															| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  															|
% 27.09/9.51  																| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																|
% 27.09/9.51  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  															|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  															| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  															| (217) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  															|
% 27.09/9.51  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (176), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  																|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  																| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  																|
% 27.09/9.51  																	| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																	| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																	|
% 27.09/9.51  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  																|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  																| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  																| (221) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  																|
% 27.09/9.51  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (187), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  																	|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  																	| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  																	|
% 27.09/9.51  																		| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																		| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																		|
% 27.09/9.51  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  																	|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  																	| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  																	| (225) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  																	|
% 27.09/9.51  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  																		|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  																		| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  																		|
% 27.09/9.51  																			| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																			| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																			|
% 27.09/9.51  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  																		|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  																		| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  																		| (229) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  																		|
% 27.09/9.51  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  																			|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  																			| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  																			|
% 27.09/9.51  																				| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																				| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																				|
% 27.09/9.51  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  																			|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  																			| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  																			| (233) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  																			|
% 27.09/9.51  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (151), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  																				|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  																				| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  																				|
% 27.09/9.51  																					| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																					| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																					|
% 27.09/9.51  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  																				|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  																				| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  																				| (237) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  																				|
% 27.09/9.51  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (159), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  																					|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  																					| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  																					|
% 27.09/9.51  																						| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																						| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																						|
% 27.09/9.51  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  																					|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  																					| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  																					| (241) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  																					|
% 27.09/9.51  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (160), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  																						|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  																						| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  																						|
% 27.09/9.51  																							| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																							| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																							|
% 27.09/9.51  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  																						|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  																						| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  																						| (245) all_24_0_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  																						|
% 27.09/9.51  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (192), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  																							|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  																							| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  																							|
% 27.09/9.51  																								| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																								| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																								|
% 27.09/9.51  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  																							|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  																							| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  																							| (249) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  																							|
% 27.09/9.51  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (152), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  																								|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  																								| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  																								|
% 27.09/9.51  																									| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																									| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																									|
% 27.09/9.51  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.51  																								|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.51  																								| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.51  																								| (253) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.51  																								|
% 27.09/9.51  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (153), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.51  																									|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.51  																									| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.51  																									|
% 27.09/9.51  																										| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.51  																										| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.51  																										|
% 27.09/9.52  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																									|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																									| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																									| (257) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																									|
% 27.09/9.52  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (154), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																										|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																										| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																										|
% 27.09/9.52  																											| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																											| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																											|
% 27.09/9.52  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																										|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																										| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																										| (261) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																										|
% 27.09/9.52  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (156), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																											|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																											| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																											|
% 27.09/9.52  																												| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																												| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																												|
% 27.09/9.52  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																											|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																											| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																											| (265) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																											|
% 27.09/9.52  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (157), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																												|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																												| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																												|
% 27.09/9.52  																													| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																													| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																													|
% 27.09/9.52  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																												|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																												| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																												| (269) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																												|
% 27.09/9.52  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (183), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																													|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																													| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																													|
% 27.09/9.52  																														| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																														| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																														|
% 27.09/9.52  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																													|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																													| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																													| (273) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																													|
% 27.09/9.52  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (171), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																														|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																														| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																														|
% 27.09/9.52  																															| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																															| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																															|
% 27.09/9.52  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																														|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																														| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																														| (277) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																														|
% 27.09/9.52  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (184), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																															|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																															| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																															|
% 27.09/9.52  																																| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																|
% 27.09/9.52  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																															|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																															| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																															| (281) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																															|
% 27.09/9.52  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (158), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																|
% 27.09/9.52  																																	| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																	| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																	|
% 27.09/9.52  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																| (285) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																|
% 27.09/9.52  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (185), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																	|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																	| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																	|
% 27.09/9.52  																																		| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																		| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																		|
% 27.09/9.52  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																	|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																	| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																	| (289) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																	|
% 27.09/9.52  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (186), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																		|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																		| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																		|
% 27.09/9.52  																																			| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																			| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																			|
% 27.09/9.52  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																		|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																		| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																		| (293) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																		|
% 27.09/9.52  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (189), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																			|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																			| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																			|
% 27.09/9.52  																																				| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																				| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																				|
% 27.09/9.52  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																			|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																			| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																			| (297) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																			|
% 27.09/9.52  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (190), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																				|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																				| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																				|
% 27.09/9.52  																																					| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																					| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																					|
% 27.09/9.52  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																				|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																				| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																				| (301) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																				|
% 27.09/9.52  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (172), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																					|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																					| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																					|
% 27.09/9.52  																																						| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																						| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																						|
% 27.09/9.52  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																					|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																					| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																					| (305) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																					|
% 27.09/9.52  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (178), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																						|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																						| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																						|
% 27.09/9.52  																																							| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																							| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																							|
% 27.09/9.52  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																						|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																						| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																						| (309) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																						|
% 27.09/9.52  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (181), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																							|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																							| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																							|
% 27.09/9.52  																																								| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																								| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																								|
% 27.09/9.52  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																							|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																							| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																							| (313) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																							|
% 27.09/9.52  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (179), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																								|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																								| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																								|
% 27.09/9.52  																																									| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																									| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																									|
% 27.09/9.52  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																								|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																								| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																								| (317) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																								|
% 27.09/9.52  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (180), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																									|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																									| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																									|
% 27.09/9.52  																																										| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																										| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																										|
% 27.09/9.52  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																									|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																									| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																									| (321) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																									|
% 27.09/9.52  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (182), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																										|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																										| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																										|
% 27.09/9.52  																																											| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																											| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																											|
% 27.09/9.52  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																										|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																										| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																										| (325) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																										|
% 27.09/9.52  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (193), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																											|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																											| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																											|
% 27.09/9.52  																																												| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																												| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																												|
% 27.09/9.52  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																											|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																											| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																											| (329) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																											|
% 27.09/9.52  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (167), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																												|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																												| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																												|
% 27.09/9.52  																																													| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																													| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																													|
% 27.09/9.52  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																												|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																												| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																												| (333) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																												|
% 27.09/9.52  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (168), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																													|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																													| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																													|
% 27.09/9.52  																																														| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																														| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																														|
% 27.09/9.52  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																													|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																													| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																													| (337) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																													|
% 27.09/9.52  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (169), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																														|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																														| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																														|
% 27.09/9.52  																																															| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																															| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																															|
% 27.09/9.52  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																														|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																														| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																														| (341) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.52  																																														|
% 27.09/9.52  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (170), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.52  																																															|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.52  																																															| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.52  																																															|
% 27.09/9.52  																																																| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.52  																																																| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.52  																																																|
% 27.09/9.52  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.52  																																															|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.52  																																															| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.52  																																															| (345) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																															|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (173), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																	| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																	| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																	|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																| (349) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (174), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																	| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																	|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																		| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																		| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																		|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																	| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																	| (353) all_23_0_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																	|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (161), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																		| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																		|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																			| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																			| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																			|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																		| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																		| (357) all_24_0_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																		|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (165), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																			| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																			|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																				| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																				| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																				|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																			| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																			| (361) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																			|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (163), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																				| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																				|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																					| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																					| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																					|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																				| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																				| (365) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																				|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (164), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																					| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																					|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																						| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																						| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																						|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																					| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																					| (369) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																					|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (166), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																						| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																						|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																							| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																							| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																							|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																						| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																						| (373) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																						|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																							| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																							|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																								| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																								| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																								|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																							| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																							| (377)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																							|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																								| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																								|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																									| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																									| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																									|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																								| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																								| (381)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																								|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																									| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																									|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																										| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																										| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																										|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																									| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																									| (385)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																									|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																										| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																										|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																											| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																											| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																											|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																										| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																										| (389)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																										|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																											| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																											|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																												| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																												| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																												|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																											| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																											| (393)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																											|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (237), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																												| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																												|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																													| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																													| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																													|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																												| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																												| (397)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																												|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (241), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																													| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																													|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																														| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																														| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																														|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																													| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																													| (401)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																													|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (249), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																														| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																														|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																															| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																															| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																															|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																														| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																														| (409)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																														|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (253), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																															| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																															|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																															| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																															| (413)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																															|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (257), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																	| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																	| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																| (417)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (261), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																	| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																		| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																		| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																	| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																	| (421)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (265), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																		| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																			| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																			| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																		| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																		| (425)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (269), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																			| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																				| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																				| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																				|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																			| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																			| (429)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (273), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																				| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																				|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																					| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																					| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																					|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																				| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																				| (433)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																				|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (277), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																					| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																					|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																						| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																						| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																						|
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																					| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.53  																																																																					| (437)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																					|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (281), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																						| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																						|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																							| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																							| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																							|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																						| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																						| (441)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																						|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																							| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																							|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																								| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																								| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																								|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																							| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																							| (445)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																							|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																								| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																								|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																									| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																									| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																									|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																								| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																								| (449)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																								|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (293), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																									| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																									|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																										| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																										| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																										|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																									| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																									| (453)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																									|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (297), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																										| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																										|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																											| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																											| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																											|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																										| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																										| (457)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																										|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																											| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																											|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																												| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																												| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																												|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																											| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																											| (461)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																											|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (305), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																												| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																												|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																													| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																													| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																													|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																												| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																												| (465)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																												|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (309), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																													| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																													|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																														| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																														| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																														|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																													| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																													| (469)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																													|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (313), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																														| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																														|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																														| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																														| (473)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																														|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															| Instantiating (473) with all_324_0_376 yields:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															| (865) (all_324_0_376 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_324_0_376 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (all_324_0_376 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_376) | ( ~ (all_324_0_376 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_324_0_376)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (317), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															| (478)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																															|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (321), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																	| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																	| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																| (482)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (325), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																	| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																		| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																		| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																	| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																	| (486)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (329), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																		| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																			| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																			| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																		| (72)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																		| (490)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (333), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																			| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																				| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																				| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																				|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																			| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																			| (494)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (337), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																				| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																				|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																					| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																					| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																					|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																				| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																				| (498)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																				|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (341), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																					| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																					|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																						| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																						| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																						|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																					| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																					| (502)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																					|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (345), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																						| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																						|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																							| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																							| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																							|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																						| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																						| (506)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																						|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (349), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																							| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																							|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																								| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																								| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																								|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																							| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																							| (510)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																							|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (353), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																								| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																								|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																									| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																									| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																									|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																								| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																								| (514)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																								|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (361), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																									| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																									|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																										| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																										| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																										|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																									| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																									| (522)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																									|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (365), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																										| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																										|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																											| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																											| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																											|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																										| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																										| (526)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																										|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (369), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																											| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																											|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																												| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																												| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																												|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																											| (17)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																											| (530)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																											|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (373), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																												| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																												|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																													| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																													| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																													|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																												| (48)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																												| (534)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																												|
% 27.09/9.54  																																																																																													| Instantiating (534) with all_384_0_391 yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													| (922) (all_384_0_391 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (all_384_0_391 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (all_384_0_391 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_384_0_391) | ( ~ (all_384_0_391 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_384_0_391)
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (34) with all_25_0_33, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													| (923) all_25_0_33 = 0 | distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (923), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													| (537) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (922), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																														| (925) (all_384_0_391 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (all_384_0_391 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (all_384_0_391 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_384_0_391)
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																														|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (925), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															| (926) (all_384_0_391 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (all_384_0_391 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (926), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																| (927) all_384_0_391 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (927) yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (928) all_384_0_391 = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (557) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (107) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| Equations (107) can reduce 17 to:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																| (932) all_384_0_391 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (932) yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (928) all_384_0_391 = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (562) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, 0, all_20_0_28 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_20_0_28, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (210) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| Equations (210) can reduce 72 to:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															| (937)  ~ (all_384_0_391 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_384_0_391
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (937) yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																| (938)  ~ (all_384_0_391 = 0)
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																| (939) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_384_0_391
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (865), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																| (940) (all_324_0_376 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_324_0_376 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (all_324_0_376 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_376)
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (940), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (941) (all_324_0_376 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_324_0_376 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0)
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (941), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| (942) all_324_0_376 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (942) yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| (943) all_324_0_376 = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| (542) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, 0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| (100) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| Equations (100) can reduce 48 to:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| (947) all_324_0_376 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (947) yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| (943) all_324_0_376 = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| (547) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, 0, all_23_0_31 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (952)  ~ (all_324_0_376 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_376
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (952) yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| (953)  ~ (all_324_0_376 = 0)
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| (954) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_376
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (39) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_324_0_376, all_384_0_391 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_384_0_391, distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_376, yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| (955) all_384_0_391 = all_324_0_376
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| Equations (955) can reduce 938 to:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| (953)  ~ (all_324_0_376 = 0)
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| From (955) and (939) follows:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| (954) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_376
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (6) with all_324_0_376, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_324_0_376, yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| (958) all_324_0_376 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (958), into two cases.
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| (572) convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| (573) $false
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| (574)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		| (943) all_324_0_376 = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																		|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| Equations (943) can reduce 953 to:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																| (964)  ~ (all_324_0_376 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_324_0_376
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (964) yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (953)  ~ (all_324_0_376 = 0)
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (966) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_324_0_376
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_324_0_376 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_324_0_376, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (943) all_324_0_376 = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| Equations (943) can reduce 953 to:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																														| (969)  ~ (all_384_0_391 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_384_0_391
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																														|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (969) yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															| (938)  ~ (all_384_0_391 = 0)
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															| (971) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_384_0_391
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_384_0_391 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_384_0_391, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															| (928) all_384_0_391 = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															| Equations (928) can reduce 938 to:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													| (587)  ~ (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																													|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																														| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																														| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																														|
% 27.09/9.55  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.56  				|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.56  				| (977)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_25_0_33
% 27.09/9.56  				|
% 27.09/9.56  					| Applying alpha-rule on (977) yields:
% 27.09/9.56  					| (105)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 27.09/9.56  					| (979) convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_25_0_33
% 27.09/9.56  					|
% 27.09/9.56  					| Instantiating formula (25) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_25_0_33, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_25_0_33, convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.56  					| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 27.09/9.56  					|
% 27.09/9.56  					| Equations (198) can reduce 105 to:
% 27.09/9.56  					| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.56  					|
% 27.09/9.56  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.56  		|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.56  		| (982)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32
% 27.09/9.56  		|
% 27.09/9.56  			| Applying alpha-rule on (982) yields:
% 27.09/9.56  			| (98)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 27.09/9.56  			| (984) convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32
% 27.09/9.56  			|
% 27.09/9.56  			| Instantiating formula (25) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_24_0_32, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_24_0_32, convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.56  			| (202) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 27.09/9.56  			|
% 27.09/9.56  			| Equations (202) can reduce 98 to:
% 27.09/9.56  			| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.56  			|
% 27.09/9.56  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.56  	|-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.56  	| (987)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31
% 27.09/9.56  	|
% 27.09/9.56  		| Applying alpha-rule on (987) yields:
% 27.09/9.56  		| (95)  ~ (all_23_0_31 = 0)
% 27.09/9.56  		| (989) convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31
% 27.09/9.56  		|
% 27.09/9.56  		| Instantiating formula (25) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_23_0_31, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_23_0_31, convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.56  		| (206) all_23_0_31 = 0
% 27.09/9.56  		|
% 27.09/9.56  		| Equations (206) can reduce 95 to:
% 27.09/9.56  		| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.56  		|
% 27.09/9.56  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.56  |-Branch two:
% 27.09/9.56  | (992)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_22_0_30
% 27.09/9.56  |
% 27.09/9.56  	| Applying alpha-rule on (992) yields:
% 27.09/9.56  	| (92)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 27.09/9.56  	| (994) convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_22_0_30
% 27.09/9.56  	|
% 27.09/9.56  	| Instantiating formula (25) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_22_0_30, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_22_0_30, convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 27.09/9.56  	| (995) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 27.09/9.56  	|
% 27.09/9.56  	| Equations (995) can reduce 92 to:
% 27.09/9.56  	| (101) $false
% 27.09/9.56  	|
% 27.09/9.56  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.09/9.56  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 27.09/9.56  
% 27.09/9.56  8965ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------