%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO192+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:27:40 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.09s 0.88s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 65 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 59 ( 26 ~; 19 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 47 ( 0 sgn 33 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X3)
=> ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
& distinct_lines(X1,X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(ci3,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci3) ).
fof(ceq2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| distinct_lines(X2,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).
fof(ci4,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci4) ).
fof(apart2,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart2) ).
fof(apart5,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| distinct_lines(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart5) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X3)
=> ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
& distinct_lines(X1,X3) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci3]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X38,X39,X40] :
( apart_point_and_line(X38,X40)
| distinct_lines(X39,X40)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X38,X39) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ distinct_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| ~ distinct_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0) )
& apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
& convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X27,X28] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X27,X28),X27)
| ~ convergent_lines(X27,X28) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| distinct_lines(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci4]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart2]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X17,X18,X19] :
( distinct_lines(X18,X19)
| distinct_lines(X17,X19)
| ~ distinct_lines(X17,X18) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[apart5])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X29,X30] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X29,X30),X30)
| ~ convergent_lines(X29,X30) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X12] : ~ distinct_lines(X12,X12),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| distinct_lines(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(esk3_0,esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(esk3_0,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ distinct_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| ~ distinct_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO192+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.81 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.81 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.81 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.81 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.81 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.81 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.81 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.81 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 13:18:22 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.81 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.81 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.85 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.85 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.88 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.09/0.88 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.88 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.88 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.88 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.88 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.88 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.88 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2799103 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.09/0.88 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.88 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.88 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.88 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.88 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.88 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.88 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.88 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.88 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.88 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.88 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.88 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.88 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2799109 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.09/0.88 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.88 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.88 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.88 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.88 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.88 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.88 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.88 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.88 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.88
% 0.09/0.88 % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.88 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.88 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.88 % Parsed axioms : 36
% 0.09/0.88 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Initial clauses : 49
% 0.09/0.88 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Initial clauses in saturation : 49
% 0.09/0.88 % Processed clauses : 58
% 0.09/0.88 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.09/0.88 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.09/0.88 % ...remaining for further processing : 54
% 0.09/0.88 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.09/0.88 % Generated clauses : 63
% 0.09/0.88 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 52
% 0.09/0.88 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Paramodulations : 63
% 0.09/0.88 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % NegExts : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.09/0.88 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.09/0.88 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.88 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.88 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.88 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.88 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.88 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.88 % Current number of processed clauses : 53
% 0.09/0.88 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.09/0.88 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.09/0.88 % Non-unit-clauses : 33
% 0.09/0.88 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 43
% 0.09/0.88 % ...number of literals in the above : 125
% 0.09/0.88 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.09/0.88 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 77
% 0.09/0.88 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 64
% 0.09/0.88 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.09/0.88 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.09/0.88 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.09/0.88 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.09/0.88 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.09/0.88 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3913
% 0.09/0.88 % Search garbage collected termcells : 509
% 0.09/0.88
% 0.09/0.88 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.88 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.09/0.88 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.09/0.88 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.09/0.88 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.09/0.88
% 0.09/0.88 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.88 % User time : 0.024 s
% 0.09/0.88 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.09/0.88 % Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.09/0.88 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.09/0.88 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------