↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GEO193+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.35s 2.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  12 unt;   6 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   32 (   0 equ;  12 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_18,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | distinct_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-01v_iwqi/lgb.p',i_0_18) ).

cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-01v_iwqi/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).

cnf(i_0_37,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-01v_iwqi/lgb.p',i_0_37) ).

cnf(i_0_50,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-01v_iwqi/lgb.p',i_0_50) ).

cnf(i_0_16,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | convergent_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-01v_iwqi/lgb.p',i_0_16) ).

cnf(i_0_36,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-01v_iwqi/lgb.p',i_0_36) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-01v_iwqi/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | distinct_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
    i_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
    i_0_37 ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1)
    | apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_50 ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    distinct_lines(esk3_0,parallel_through_point(X1,intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | convergent_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
    i_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    convergent_lines(esk3_0,parallel_through_point(X1,intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X2),X1),
    i_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0)),X2)
    | convergent_lines(esk3_0,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    convergent_lines(esk3_0,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : GEO193+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 21:46:10 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.48  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.35/2.46  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.35/2.46  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.35/2.46  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.35/2.46  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_S5PRR_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4S
% 7.35/2.46  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 7.35/2.46  #
% 7.35/2.46  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 7.35/2.46  
% 7.35/2.46  # Proof found!
% 7.35/2.46  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.35/2.46  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.35/2.46  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.35/2.46  
% 7.35/2.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.35/2.46  # User time                : 0.024 s
% 7.35/2.46  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 7.35/2.46  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 7.35/2.46  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.35/2.46  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------