↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GEO193+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:20:14 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.50s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  15 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   94 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  24   ~;  26   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   0 sgn  65   !;   6   ?;  19   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] : ~ distinct_lines(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart2) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_lines(X0,X1)
     => ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
        | distinct_lines(X0,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart5) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
        | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( distinct_lines(X0,X1)
     => convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+1.ax',p1) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X0),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp1) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,parallel_through_point(X1,X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp2) ).

fof(f36,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( convergent_lines(X0,X2)
        & convergent_lines(X2,X1)
        & convergent_lines(X0,X1) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X2)
       => apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X2,X1),X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( convergent_lines(X0,X2)
          & convergent_lines(X2,X1)
          & convergent_lines(X0,X1) )
       => ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X2)
         => apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X2,X1),X0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f36]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X0,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X0,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f52]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1)
      | convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( convergent_lines(X0,X2)
      & convergent_lines(X2,X1)
      & convergent_lines(X0,X1)
      & apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X2)
      & ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X2,X1),X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( convergent_lines(X0,X2)
      & convergent_lines(X2,X1)
      & convergent_lines(X0,X1)
      & apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X2)
      & ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X2,X1),X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f76]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(sK0,sK2)
    & convergent_lines(sK2,sK1)
    & convergent_lines(sK0,sK1)
    & apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK0,sK1),sK2)
    & ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK2,sK1),sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f77]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ distinct_lines(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1)
      | convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X0),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,parallel_through_point(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK0,sK1),sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ distinct_lines(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f80]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X0,X2)
      | ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( convergent_lines(X0,X1)
      | ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f93]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X0,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,parallel_through_point(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

tcf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK0,sK1),sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).

tcf(c_454,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = intersection_point(sK0,sK1),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_459,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(iPr_def_10,sK2),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_454]) ).

tcf(c_1157,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(iPr_def_10,X0)
      | distinct_lines(sK2,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_459,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_1509,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(iPr_def_10,X0)
      | distinct_lines(sK2,X1)
      | distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1157,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_5684,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(iPr_def_10,X0)
      | distinct_lines(X0,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1509,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_6386,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(iPr_def_10,X0)
      | convergent_lines(X0,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5684,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_6405,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X0,iPr_def_10),sK2),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6386,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_6454,plain,
    $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6405,c_64]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GEO193+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 11:24:02 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.41  % Proving...
% 3.50/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.50/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.50/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.50/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 4 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.50/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 3.50/1.27  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % 
% 3.50/1.27  % clauses                               35
% 3.50/1.27  % conjectures                           5
% 3.50/1.27  % EPR                                   25
% 3.50/1.27  % Horn                                  19
% 3.50/1.27  % unary                                 14
% 3.50/1.27  % binary                                6
% 3.50/1.27  % lits                                  82
% 3.50/1.27  % lits eq                               2
% 3.50/1.27  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.50/1.27  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.50/1.27  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.50/1.27  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.50/1.27  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % ------ 
% 3.50/1.27  % Current options:
% 3.50/1.27  % ------ 
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % 
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 3.50/1.27  % 
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.50/1.27  
% 3.50/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------