↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO194+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:23 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 59.15s 59.95s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 59.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : GEO194+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 09:28:54 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 59.05/59.94  %-------------------------------------------
% 59.05/59.94  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 59.05/59.94  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 59.05/59.94  % Transform   :cnf
% 59.05/59.94  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 59.05/59.94  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 59.05/59.94  
% 59.05/59.94  % Result      :Theorem 58.530000s
% 59.05/59.94  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.530000s
% 59.05/59.94  %-------------------------------------------
% 59.15/59.95  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 59.15/59.95  % File     : GEO194+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 59.15/59.95  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 59.15/59.95  % Problem  : Corollary to symmetry of apartness
% 59.15/59.95  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 59.15/59.95  % English  : If the lines X, Y, and Z are pairwise convergent, and the
% 59.15/59.95  %            intersection point of X and Y is apart from a line Z, then
% 59.15/59.95  %            the intersection point of X and Z is apart from Y.
% 59.15/59.95  
% 59.15/59.95  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 59.15/59.95  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 59.15/59.95  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 59.15/59.95  % Names    : Corollary 4.10.ii [vPl95]
% 59.15/59.95  
% 59.15/59.95  % Status   : Theorem
% 59.15/59.95  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.09 v6.1.0, 0.16 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.25 v5.4.0, 0.26 v5.3.0, 0.30 v5.2.0, 0.29 v5.0.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.22 v4.0.1, 0.26 v4.0.0, 0.30 v3.7.0, 0.29 v3.5.0, 0.25 v3.4.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 59.15/59.95  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 59.15/59.95  %            Number of atoms       :   40 (   0 equ)
% 59.15/59.95  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 59.15/59.95  %            Number of connectives :   32 (   7   ~;   9   |;   3   &)
% 59.15/59.95  %                                         (   0 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 59.15/59.95  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 59.15/59.95  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 59.15/59.95  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 59.15/59.95  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 59.15/59.95  %            Number of variables   :   36 (  36   !;   0   ?)
% 59.15/59.95  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 59.15/59.95  
% 59.15/59.95  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 59.15/59.95  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 59.15/59.95  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 59.15/59.95  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 59.15/59.95  fof(con,conjecture,
% 59.15/59.95      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 59.15/59.95        ( ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
% 59.15/59.95          & convergent_lines(Z,Y)
% 59.15/59.95          & convergent_lines(X,Z) )
% 59.15/59.95       => ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Z)
% 59.15/59.95         => apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Z),Y) ) ) ).
% 59.15/59.95  
% 59.15/59.95  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 59.15/59.95  %-------------------------------------------
% 59.15/59.95  % Proof found
% 59.15/59.95  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 59.15/59.95  % SZS output start Proof
% 59.15/59.96  %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:0)
% 59.15/59.96  %VarNum:74(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 59.15/59.96  %MaxLitNum:6
% 59.15/59.96  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 59.15/59.96  %SharedTerms:10
% 59.15/59.96  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 8
% 59.15/59.96  %singleGoalClaCount:5
% 59.15/59.96  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 59.15/59.96  [2]P1(a1,a3)
% 59.15/59.96  [3]P1(a3,a2)
% 59.15/59.96  [4]P2(f4(a1,a2),a3)
% 59.15/59.96  [8]~P2(f4(a1,a3),a2)
% 59.15/59.96  [5]~P3(x51,x51)
% 59.15/59.96  [6]~P4(x61,x61)
% 59.15/59.96  [7]~P1(x71,x71)
% 59.15/59.96  [15]~P3(x151,x152)+~P2(x152,f5(x151,x152))
% 59.15/59.96  [16]~P3(x161,x162)+~P2(x161,f5(x161,x162))
% 59.15/59.96  [17]~P1(x171,x172)+~P2(f4(x171,x172),x172)
% 59.15/59.96  [18]~P1(x181,x182)+~P2(f4(x181,x182),x181)
% 59.15/59.96  [9]~P3(x93,x91)+P3(x91,x92)+P3(x93,x92)
% 59.15/59.96  [10]~P2(x101,x103)+P3(x101,x102)+P2(x102,x103)
% 59.15/59.96  [11]~P4(x113,x111)+P4(x111,x112)+P4(x113,x112)
% 59.15/59.96  [12]~P1(x123,x121)+P4(x121,x122)+P1(x123,x122)
% 59.15/59.96  [13]~P2(x133,x131)+P4(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x132)
% 59.15/59.96  [14]~P1(x143,x141)+P1(x141,x142)+P1(x143,x142)
% 59.15/59.96  [19]P2(x194,x193)+~P3(x194,x191)+~P4(x193,x192)+P2(x191,x192)+P2(x191,x193)+P2(x194,x192)
% 59.15/59.96  %EqnAxiom
% 59.15/59.96  
% 59.15/59.96  %-------------------------------------------
% 59.15/59.96  cnf(20,plain,
% 59.15/59.96     (P4(a2,a1)),
% 59.15/59.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7,12])).
% 59.15/59.96  cnf(66,plain,
% 59.15/59.96     (~P2(f4(a1,a2),a2)),
% 59.15/59.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,17,12])).
% 59.15/59.96  cnf(69,plain,
% 59.15/59.96     (~P2(f4(a1,a3),a1)),
% 59.15/59.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,6,18,13])).
% 59.15/59.96  cnf(71,plain,
% 59.15/59.96     (~P2(f4(a1,a2),a1)),
% 59.15/59.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,18,12])).
% 59.15/59.96  cnf(92,plain,
% 59.15/59.96     (P3(f4(a1,a2),f4(a1,a3))),
% 59.15/59.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,2,10,17])).
% 59.15/59.96  cnf(794,plain,
% 59.15/59.96     ($false),
% 59.15/59.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,69,71,20,92,66,19]),
% 59.15/59.96     ['proof']).
% 59.15/59.96  % SZS output end Proof
% 59.15/59.96  % Total time :58.530000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------