↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO194+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:24 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 26.06s 26.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 26.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : GEO194+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 07:39:53 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 26.06/26.19  %-------------------------------------------
% 26.06/26.19  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 26.06/26.19  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 26.06/26.19  % Transform   :cnf
% 26.06/26.19  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 26.06/26.19  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 26.06/26.19  
% 26.06/26.20  % Result      :Theorem 25.580000s
% 26.06/26.20  % Output      :CNFRefutation 25.580000s
% 26.06/26.20  %-------------------------------------------
% 26.06/26.20  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 26.06/26.20  % File     : GEO194+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 26.06/26.20  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 26.06/26.20  % Problem  : Corollary to symmetry of apartness
% 26.06/26.20  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 26.06/26.20  % English  : If the lines X, Y, and Z are pairwise convergent, and the
% 26.06/26.20  %            intersection point of X and Y is apart from a line Z, then
% 26.06/26.20  %            the intersection point of X and Z is apart from Y.
% 26.06/26.20  
% 26.06/26.20  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 26.06/26.20  %          : [Li97]  Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 26.06/26.20  %          : [Li98]  Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 26.06/26.20  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 26.06/26.20  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 26.06/26.20  % Names    :
% 26.06/26.20  
% 26.06/26.20  % Status   : Theorem
% 26.06/26.20  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.08 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.4.0, 0.22 v5.3.0, 0.35 v5.2.0, 0.21 v5.0.0, 0.15 v4.1.0, 0.17 v4.0.1, 0.16 v4.0.0, 0.15 v3.7.0, 0.29 v3.5.0, 0.25 v3.4.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 26.06/26.20  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 26.06/26.20  %            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
% 26.06/26.20  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
% 26.06/26.20  %            Number of connectives :   29 (   3   ~;   9   |;   4   &)
% 26.06/26.20  %                                         (   0 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 26.06/26.20  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 26.06/26.20  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 26.06/26.20  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 26.06/26.20  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 26.06/26.20  %            Number of variables   :   33 (  33   !;   0   ?)
% 26.06/26.20  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 26.06/26.20  
% 26.06/26.20  % Comments :  Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 26.06/26.20  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 26.06/26.20  include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 26.06/26.20  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 26.06/26.20  fof(con,conjecture,
% 26.06/26.20      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 26.06/26.20        ( ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
% 26.06/26.20          & convergent_lines(Z,Y)
% 26.06/26.20          & convergent_lines(X,Z) )
% 26.06/26.20       => ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Z)
% 26.06/26.20         => apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Z),Y) ) ) ).
% 26.06/26.20  
% 26.06/26.20  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 26.06/26.20  %-------------------------------------------
% 26.06/26.20  % Proof found
% 26.06/26.20  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 26.06/26.20  % SZS output start Proof
% 26.06/26.20  %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:0)
% 26.06/26.20  %VarNum:80(SingletonVarNum:36)
% 26.06/26.20  %MaxLitNum:6
% 26.06/26.20  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 26.06/26.20  %SharedTerms:10
% 26.06/26.20  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 8
% 26.16/26.20  %singleGoalClaCount:5
% 26.16/26.20  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 26.16/26.20  [2]P1(a1,a3)
% 26.16/26.20  [3]P1(a3,a2)
% 26.16/26.20  [4]P2(f4(a1,a2),a3)
% 26.16/26.20  [8]~P2(f4(a1,a3),a2)
% 26.16/26.20  [5]~P3(x51,x51)
% 26.16/26.20  [6]~P4(x61,x61)
% 26.16/26.20  [7]~P1(x71,x71)
% 26.16/26.20  [9]~P1(x91,x92)+P4(x91,x92)
% 26.16/26.20  [10]~P3(x103,x101)+P3(x101,x102)+P3(x103,x102)
% 26.16/26.20  [11]~P2(x111,x113)+P3(x111,x112)+P2(x112,x113)
% 26.16/26.20  [12]~P4(x123,x121)+P4(x121,x122)+P4(x123,x122)
% 26.16/26.20  [13]~P2(x133,x131)+P4(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x132)
% 26.16/26.20  [14]~P1(x143,x141)+P1(x141,x142)+P1(x143,x142)
% 26.16/26.20  [15]~P1(x152,x153)+~P2(x151,x153)+P3(x151,f4(x152,x153))
% 26.16/26.20  [16]~P1(x162,x163)+~P2(x161,x162)+P3(x161,f4(x162,x163))
% 26.16/26.20  [17]P3(x171,x172)+~P3(x173,x172)+~P2(x171,f5(x173,x172))
% 26.16/26.20  [18]P3(x181,x182)+~P3(x182,x183)+~P2(x181,f5(x182,x183))
% 26.16/26.20  [19]P2(x194,x193)+~P3(x194,x191)+~P4(x193,x192)+P2(x191,x192)+P2(x191,x193)+P2(x194,x192)
% 26.16/26.20  %EqnAxiom
% 26.16/26.20  
% 26.16/26.20  %-------------------------------------------
% 26.16/26.21  cnf(23,plain,
% 26.16/26.21     (~P2(f4(a1,a2),a2)),
% 26.16/26.21     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,7,14,15])).
% 26.16/26.21  cnf(24,plain,
% 26.16/26.21     (~P3(x241,x241)),
% 26.16/26.21     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 26.16/26.21  cnf(26,plain,
% 26.16/26.21     (~P2(f4(a1,a2),a1)),
% 26.16/26.21     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,24,7,14,15,16])).
% 26.16/26.21  cnf(37,plain,
% 26.16/26.21     (~P2(f4(a1,a3),a1)),
% 26.16/26.21     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,16])).
% 26.16/26.21  cnf(38,plain,
% 26.16/26.21     (~P3(x381,x381)),
% 26.16/26.21     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 26.16/26.21  cnf(41,plain,
% 26.16/26.21     (~P3(x411,x411)),
% 26.16/26.21     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 26.16/26.21  cnf(45,plain,
% 26.16/26.21     (P3(f4(a1,a3),f4(a1,a2))),
% 26.16/26.21     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4,5,38,41,16,15,11,10])).
% 26.16/26.21  cnf(84,plain,
% 26.16/26.21     (P4(a1,a2)),
% 26.16/26.21     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7,14,9])).
% 26.16/26.21  cnf(87,plain,
% 26.16/26.21     (P4(a2,a1)),
% 26.16/26.21     inference(scs_inference,[],[84,6,12])).
% 26.16/26.21  cnf(829,plain,
% 26.16/26.21     ($false),
% 26.16/26.21     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,23,26,37,87,45,19]),
% 26.16/26.21     ['proof']).
% 26.16/26.21  % SZS output end Proof
% 26.16/26.21  % Total time :25.580000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------