↑ Up

ePrincess---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO195+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 22.47s 6.03s
% Output   : Proof 30.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GEO195+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 06:06:19 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.57/0.59          ____       _                          
% 0.57/0.59    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.57/0.59   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.57/0.59  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.57/0.59  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.57/0.59  
% 0.57/0.59  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.57/0.59  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.57/0.59  
% 0.57/0.59  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.57/0.59  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.57/0.59  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.57/0.59  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.57/0.59  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.57/0.59  
% 0.57/0.59  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.57/0.59  
% 0.57/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.76/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.77/0.94  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.93/1.07  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.11/1.09  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.18/1.40  Prover 0: gave up
% 3.18/1.40  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.18/1.42  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.52/1.51  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.70/1.54  Prover 1: gave up
% 3.70/1.54  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.70/1.56  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 4.09/1.67  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.09/1.68  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.25/3.83  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 13.25/3.84  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 13.25/3.85  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.25/3.86  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.61/3.89  Prover 3: gave up
% 13.61/3.90  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 13.61/3.91  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 13.61/3.97  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.61/3.97  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.91/4.94  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 17.91/4.97  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 18.31/5.03  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.47/6.03  Prover 5: proved (1088ms)
% 22.47/6.03  Prover 4: stopped
% 22.47/6.03  Prover 2: stopped
% 22.47/6.03  
% 22.47/6.03  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 22.47/6.03  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 22.47/6.03  
% 22.47/6.03  Generating proof ... found it (size 446)
% 29.41/7.75  
% 29.41/7.75  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 29.41/7.75  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 29.41/7.76  | (0)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & intersection_point(v1, v0) = v4 & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v4, v2) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v2, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 29.78/7.82  | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 29.78/7.82  | (1)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 29.78/7.82  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3))
% 29.78/7.82  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 29.78/7.82  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 29.78/7.82  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 29.78/7.82  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3))
% 29.78/7.82  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 29.78/7.82  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.78/7.82  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 29.78/7.82  | (10)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & intersection_point(v1, v0) = v4 & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v4, v2) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v2, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 29.78/7.82  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 29.78/7.82  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 29.78/7.83  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 29.78/7.83  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.78/7.83  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 29.78/7.83  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 29.78/7.83  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 29.78/7.83  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 29.78/7.83  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 29.78/7.83  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 29.78/7.83  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 29.78/7.83  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 29.78/7.83  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 29.78/7.83  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 29.78/7.83  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 29.78/7.83  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 29.78/7.83  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.78/7.83  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 29.78/7.83  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 29.78/7.84  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 29.78/7.84  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3))
% 29.78/7.84  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.78/7.84  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 29.78/7.84  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 29.78/7.84  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.78/7.84  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 29.78/7.84  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 29.78/7.84  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 29.78/7.84  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 29.78/7.84  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 29.78/7.84  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 29.78/7.84  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 29.78/7.84  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 29.78/7.84  |
% 29.78/7.84  | Instantiating (10) with all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 yields:
% 29.78/7.84  | (44)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_1_1_1 & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 29.78/7.84  |
% 29.78/7.84  | Applying alpha-rule on (44) yields:
% 29.78/7.84  | (45) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 29.78/7.84  | (46) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 29.78/7.84  | (47) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 29.78/7.84  | (48) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 29.78/7.84  | (49) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0
% 29.78/7.84  | (50) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2
% 29.78/7.84  | (51) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_1_1_1
% 29.78/7.84  | (52)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 29.78/7.84  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_4_4 yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (53)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_5_5 yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (54)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (38) with all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (55)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (36) with all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (56)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (38) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (57)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (36) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (58)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (12) with all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (59) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (60) all_1_0_0 = 0 | distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (2) with all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (61)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_4_4) = v1)
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (6) with all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (62)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_3_3) = v1)
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (2) with all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (63)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_3_3) = v1)
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (6) with all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (64)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_5_5) = v1)
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (2) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (65)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_4_4) = v1)
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating formula (6) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (66)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_5_5) = v1)
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating (66) with all_16_0_6, all_16_1_7 yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (67)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_1_7 & apart_point_and_line(all_16_1_7, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Applying alpha-rule on (67) yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 29.78/7.85  | (69) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_1_7
% 29.78/7.85  | (70) apart_point_and_line(all_16_1_7, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating (64) with all_18_0_8, all_18_1_9 yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (71)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_18_1_9 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Applying alpha-rule on (71) yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 29.78/7.85  | (73) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_18_1_9
% 29.78/7.85  | (74) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating (62) with all_20_0_10, all_20_1_11 yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (75)  ~ (all_20_0_10 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_20_1_11 & apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Applying alpha-rule on (75) yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (76)  ~ (all_20_0_10 = 0)
% 29.78/7.85  | (77) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_20_1_11
% 29.78/7.85  | (78) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10
% 29.78/7.85  |
% 29.78/7.85  | Instantiating (61) with all_22_0_12, all_22_1_13 yields:
% 29.78/7.85  | (79)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_22_1_13 & apart_point_and_line(all_22_1_13, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Applying alpha-rule on (79) yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 29.78/7.86  | (81) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_22_1_13
% 29.78/7.86  | (82) apart_point_and_line(all_22_1_13, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Instantiating (63) with all_24_0_14, all_24_1_15 yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (83)  ~ (all_24_0_14 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_24_1_15 & apart_point_and_line(all_24_1_15, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Applying alpha-rule on (83) yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (84)  ~ (all_24_0_14 = 0)
% 29.78/7.86  | (85) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_24_1_15
% 29.78/7.86  | (86) apart_point_and_line(all_24_1_15, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Instantiating (65) with all_26_0_16, all_26_1_17 yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (87)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_26_1_17 & apart_point_and_line(all_26_1_17, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Applying alpha-rule on (87) yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 29.78/7.86  | (89) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_26_1_17
% 29.78/7.86  | (90) apart_point_and_line(all_26_1_17, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Instantiating (58) with all_28_0_18, all_28_1_19 yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (91) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_18 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_28_1_19 & ( ~ (all_28_0_18 = 0) |  ~ (all_28_1_19 = 0))
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Applying alpha-rule on (91) yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (92) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_18
% 29.78/7.86  | (93) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_28_1_19
% 29.78/7.86  | (94)  ~ (all_28_0_18 = 0) |  ~ (all_28_1_19 = 0)
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Instantiating (57) with all_30_0_20, all_30_1_21 yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (95) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_30_0_20 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_30_1_21 & ( ~ (all_30_0_20 = 0) |  ~ (all_30_1_21 = 0))
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Applying alpha-rule on (95) yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (96) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_30_0_20
% 29.78/7.86  | (97) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_30_1_21
% 29.78/7.86  | (98)  ~ (all_30_0_20 = 0) |  ~ (all_30_1_21 = 0)
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Instantiating (56) with all_32_0_22, all_32_1_23 yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (99) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22 & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_32_1_23 & ( ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0) |  ~ (all_32_1_23 = 0))
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Applying alpha-rule on (99) yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (100) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22
% 29.78/7.86  | (101) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_32_1_23
% 29.78/7.86  | (102)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0) |  ~ (all_32_1_23 = 0)
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Instantiating (55) with all_34_0_24, all_34_1_25 yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (103) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24 & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_34_1_25 & ( ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0) |  ~ (all_34_1_25 = 0))
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  | Applying alpha-rule on (103) yields:
% 29.78/7.86  | (104) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24
% 29.78/7.86  | (105) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_34_1_25
% 29.78/7.86  | (106)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0) |  ~ (all_34_1_25 = 0)
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (60), into two cases.
% 29.78/7.86  |-Branch one:
% 29.78/7.86  | (107) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 29.78/7.86  |
% 29.78/7.86  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (59), into two cases.
% 29.78/7.86  	|-Branch one:
% 29.78/7.86  	| (108) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 29.78/7.86  	|
% 29.78/7.86  		| Equations (108) can reduce 52 to:
% 29.78/7.86  		| (109) $false
% 29.78/7.86  		|
% 29.78/7.86  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.78/7.86  	|-Branch two:
% 29.78/7.86  	| (52)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 29.78/7.86  	| (111)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.86  	|
% 29.78/7.86  		| Instantiating (111) with all_44_0_26, all_44_1_27, all_44_2_28, all_44_3_29 yields:
% 29.78/7.86  		| (112) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_44_0_26 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_44_1_27 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_44_2_28 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = all_44_3_29 & ( ~ (all_44_2_28 = 0) |  ~ (all_44_3_29 = 0) | all_44_0_26 = 0 | all_44_1_27 = 0)
% 29.78/7.86  		|
% 29.78/7.86  		| Applying alpha-rule on (112) yields:
% 29.78/7.86  		| (113) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_44_0_26
% 29.78/7.86  		| (114) distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = all_44_3_29
% 29.78/7.86  		| (115) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_44_1_27
% 29.78/7.86  		| (116)  ~ (all_44_2_28 = 0) |  ~ (all_44_3_29 = 0) | all_44_0_26 = 0 | all_44_1_27 = 0
% 29.78/7.86  		| (117) distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_44_2_28
% 29.78/7.86  		|
% 29.78/7.86  		| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_20_1_11, all_22_1_13 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_22_1_13, intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_20_1_11, yields:
% 29.78/7.86  		| (118) all_22_1_13 = all_20_1_11
% 29.78/7.86  		|
% 29.78/7.86  		| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_18_1_9, all_24_1_15 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_24_1_15, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_18_1_9, yields:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (119) all_24_1_15 = all_18_1_9
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_26_1_17, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_26_1_17, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (120) all_26_1_17 = all_1_2_2
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_16_1_7, all_26_1_17 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_26_1_17, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (121) all_26_1_17 = all_16_1_7
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_44_0_26, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_44_0_26, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (122) all_44_0_26 = all_1_0_0
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_44_1_27, all_44_0_26 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_44_0_26, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_44_1_27, yields:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (123) all_44_0_26 = all_44_1_27
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_30_0_20, all_26_0_16 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_30_0_20, yields:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (124) all_30_0_20 = all_26_0_16 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16)
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_28_0_18, all_16_0_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_18, yields:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (125) all_28_0_18 = all_16_0_6 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6)
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_32_1_23, all_34_1_25 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_34_1_25, convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_32_1_23, yields:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (126) all_34_1_25 = all_32_1_23
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_30_1_21, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_30_1_21, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (127) all_30_1_21 = 0
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_28_1_19, all_30_1_21 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_30_1_21, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_28_1_19, yields:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (128) all_30_1_21 = all_28_1_19
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Combining equations (122,123) yields a new equation:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (129) all_44_1_27 = all_1_0_0
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Combining equations (128,127) yields a new equation:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (130) all_28_1_19 = 0
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Simplifying 130 yields:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (131) all_28_1_19 = 0
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Combining equations (120,121) yields a new equation:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (132) all_16_1_7 = all_1_2_2
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| Combining equations (132,121) yields a new equation:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (120) all_26_1_17 = all_1_2_2
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| From (120) and (90) follows:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (134) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| From (119) and (86) follows:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (135) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| From (118) and (82) follows:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (136) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| From (132) and (70) follows:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (137) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| From (129) and (115) follows:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (49) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| From (126) and (105) follows:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (101) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_32_1_23
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		| From (131) and (93) follows:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (47) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (98), into two cases.
% 29.78/7.87  		|-Branch one:
% 29.78/7.87  		| (141)  ~ (all_30_0_20 = 0)
% 29.78/7.87  		|
% 29.78/7.87  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (94), into two cases.
% 29.78/7.87  			|-Branch one:
% 29.78/7.87  			| (142)  ~ (all_28_0_18 = 0)
% 29.78/7.87  			|
% 29.78/7.87  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (125), into two cases.
% 29.78/7.87  				|-Branch one:
% 29.78/7.87  				| (143)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6)
% 29.78/7.87  				|
% 29.78/7.87  					| Using (137) and (143) yields:
% 29.78/7.87  					| (144) $false
% 29.78/7.87  					|
% 29.78/7.87  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.78/7.87  				|-Branch two:
% 29.78/7.87  				| (137) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 29.78/7.87  				| (146) all_28_0_18 = all_16_0_6
% 29.78/7.87  				|
% 29.78/7.87  					| Equations (146) can reduce 142 to:
% 29.78/7.87  					| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 29.78/7.87  					|
% 29.78/7.87  					| From (146) and (92) follows:
% 29.78/7.87  					| (137) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 29.78/7.87  					|
% 29.78/7.87  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (124), into two cases.
% 29.78/7.87  					|-Branch one:
% 29.78/7.87  					| (149)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16)
% 29.78/7.87  					|
% 29.78/7.87  						| Using (134) and (149) yields:
% 29.78/7.87  						| (144) $false
% 29.78/7.87  						|
% 29.78/7.87  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 29.78/7.87  					|-Branch two:
% 29.78/7.87  					| (134) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16
% 29.78/7.87  					| (152) all_30_0_20 = all_26_0_16
% 29.78/7.87  					|
% 29.78/7.87  						| Equations (152) can reduce 141 to:
% 29.78/7.87  						| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 29.78/7.87  						|
% 29.78/7.87  						| From (152) and (96) follows:
% 29.78/7.87  						| (134) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16
% 29.78/7.87  						|
% 29.78/7.87  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_18_0_8, all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 29.78/7.87  						| (155) all_18_0_8 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.88  						|
% 29.78/7.88  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_1_0_0, all_18_0_8, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 29.78/7.88  						| (156) all_18_0_8 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.88  						|
% 29.78/7.88  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_18_0_8, all_22_0_12, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, yields:
% 29.78/7.88  						| (157) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.88  						|
% 29.78/7.88  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_22_0_12, all_18_0_8, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, yields:
% 29.78/7.88  						| (158) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.88  						|
% 29.78/7.88  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_18_0_8, all_22_0_12, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, yields:
% 29.78/7.88  						| (159) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.88  						|
% 29.78/7.88  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_22_0_12, all_18_0_8, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, yields:
% 29.78/7.88  						| (160) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.88  						|
% 29.78/7.88  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_18_0_8, all_18_0_8, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_18_1_9, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, yields:
% 29.78/7.88  						| (161) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.88  						|
% 29.78/7.88  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_32_0_22, all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 29.78/7.88  						| (162) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.88  						|
% 29.78/7.88  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_1_0_0, all_32_0_22, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 29.78/7.88  						| (163) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.88  						|
% 29.78/7.88  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_32_0_22, all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 29.78/7.88  						| (164) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.88  						|
% 29.78/7.88  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_1_0_0, all_32_0_22, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 29.78/7.88  						| (165) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.88  						|
% 29.78/7.88  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_32_0_22, all_20_0_10, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 29.78/7.88  						| (166) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.89  						|
% 29.78/7.89  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_20_0_10, all_32_0_22, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_20_1_11, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 29.78/7.89  						| (167) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.89  						|
% 29.78/7.89  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_32_0_22, all_20_0_10, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 29.78/7.89  						| (168) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.89  						|
% 29.78/7.89  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_20_0_10, all_32_0_22, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_20_1_11, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 29.78/7.89  						| (169) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.89  						|
% 29.78/7.89  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_32_0_22, all_22_0_12, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 29.78/7.89  						| (170) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 29.78/7.89  						|
% 29.78/7.89  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_22_0_12, all_32_0_22, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_20_1_11, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 29.78/7.89  						| (171) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.89  						|
% 30.18/7.89  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_32_0_22, all_24_0_14, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 30.18/7.89  						| (172) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.89  						|
% 30.18/7.89  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_24_0_14, all_32_0_22, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 30.18/7.89  						| (173) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.89  						|
% 30.18/7.89  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_32_0_22, all_24_0_14, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 30.18/7.89  						| (174) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.89  						|
% 30.18/7.89  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_24_0_14, all_32_0_22, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 30.18/7.89  						| (175) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.89  						|
% 30.18/7.89  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_32_0_22, all_18_0_8, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 30.18/7.89  						| (176) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.89  						|
% 30.18/7.89  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_18_0_8, all_32_0_22, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 30.18/7.89  						| (177) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.89  						|
% 30.18/7.89  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_32_0_22, all_18_0_8, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 30.18/7.90  						| (178) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.90  						|
% 30.18/7.90  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_18_0_8, all_32_0_22, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 30.18/7.90  						| (179) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.90  						|
% 30.18/7.90  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_32_0_22, all_32_0_22, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 30.18/7.90  						| (180) all_32_0_22 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.90  						|
% 30.18/7.90  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_26_0_16, all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 30.18/7.90  						| (181) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.90  						|
% 30.18/7.90  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_1_0_0, all_26_0_16, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 30.18/7.90  						| (182) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.90  						|
% 30.18/7.90  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_26_0_16, all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 30.18/7.90  						| (183) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.90  						|
% 30.18/7.90  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_1_0_0, all_26_0_16, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 30.18/7.90  						| (184) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.90  						|
% 30.18/7.90  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_16_0_6, all_22_0_12, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.90  						| (185) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.90  						|
% 30.18/7.90  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_22_0_12, all_16_0_6, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.90  						| (186) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.90  						|
% 30.18/7.90  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_16_0_6, all_22_0_12, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.90  						| (187) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.90  						|
% 30.18/7.90  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_22_0_12, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.90  						| (188) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.90  						|
% 30.18/7.90  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_16_0_6, all_24_0_14, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.90  						| (189) all_24_0_14 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.91  						|
% 30.18/7.91  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_24_0_14, all_16_0_6, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.91  						| (190) all_24_0_14 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.91  						|
% 30.18/7.91  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_16_0_6, all_24_0_14, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.91  						| (191) all_24_0_14 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.91  						|
% 30.18/7.91  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_24_0_14, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.91  						| (192) all_24_0_14 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.91  						|
% 30.18/7.91  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_16_0_6, all_18_0_8, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.91  						| (193) all_18_0_8 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.91  						|
% 30.18/7.91  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_18_0_8, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.91  						| (194) all_18_0_8 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.91  						|
% 30.18/7.91  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_16_0_6, all_32_0_22, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.91  						| (195) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.91  						|
% 30.18/7.91  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_32_0_22, all_16_0_6, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.91  						| (196) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.91  						|
% 30.18/7.91  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_16_0_6, all_32_0_22, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.91  						| (197) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.91  						|
% 30.18/7.91  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_32_0_22, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.91  						| (198) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.91  						|
% 30.18/7.91  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_16_0_6, all_26_0_16, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.91  						| (199) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.91  						|
% 30.18/7.91  						| Instantiating formula (12) with all_26_0_16, all_16_0_6, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.91  						| (200) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.92  						|
% 30.18/7.92  						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_16_0_6, all_26_0_16, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.92  						| (201) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.92  						|
% 30.18/7.92  						| Instantiating formula (25) with all_32_1_23, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_32_1_23, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0,  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = 0), yields:
% 30.18/7.92  						| (202) all_32_1_23 = 0
% 30.18/7.92  						|
% 30.18/7.92  						| Instantiating formula (2) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 yields:
% 30.18/7.92  						| (203)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_5_5) = v1)
% 30.18/7.92  						|
% 30.18/7.92  						| Instantiating formula (34) with all_32_0_22, all_32_0_22, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 30.18/7.92  						| (204) all_32_0_22 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.18/7.92  						|
% 30.18/7.92  						| Instantiating formula (34) with all_32_0_22, all_34_0_24, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 30.18/7.92  						| (205) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_32_0_22 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.18/7.92  						|
% 30.18/7.92  						| Instantiating formula (28) with all_26_0_16, all_26_0_16, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 30.18/7.92  						| (206) all_26_0_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.18/7.92  						|
% 30.18/7.92  						| Instantiating formula (28) with all_16_0_6, all_26_0_16, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 30.18/7.92  						| (207) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.18/7.92  						|
% 30.18/7.92  						| Instantiating formula (28) with all_16_0_6, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 30.18/7.92  						| (208) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.18/7.92  						|
% 30.18/7.92  						| From (202) and (101) follows:
% 30.18/7.92  						| (209) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 30.18/7.92  						|
% 30.18/7.92  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (102), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.92  						|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.92  						| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.92  						|
% 30.18/7.92  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.92  							|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.92  							| (211) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 30.18/7.92  							|
% 30.18/7.92  								| Equations (211) can reduce 68 to:
% 30.18/7.92  								| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.92  								|
% 30.18/7.92  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.92  							|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.92  							| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 30.18/7.92  							| (214)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.18/7.92  							|
% 30.18/7.92  								| Instantiating (214) with all_87_0_34, all_87_1_35, all_87_2_36 yields:
% 30.18/7.92  								| (215) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_87_0_34 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_87_1_35 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_87_2_36 & ( ~ (all_87_2_36 = 0) | all_87_0_34 = 0 | all_87_1_35 = 0)
% 30.18/7.92  								|
% 30.18/7.92  								| Applying alpha-rule on (215) yields:
% 30.18/7.92  								| (216) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_87_0_34
% 30.18/7.92  								| (217) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_87_1_35
% 30.18/7.92  								| (218) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_87_2_36
% 30.18/7.92  								| (219)  ~ (all_87_2_36 = 0) | all_87_0_34 = 0 | all_87_1_35 = 0
% 30.18/7.92  								|
% 30.18/7.92  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (185), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.92  								|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.92  								| (220) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 30.18/7.92  								|
% 30.18/7.92  									| Equations (220) can reduce 80 to:
% 30.18/7.92  									| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.92  									|
% 30.18/7.92  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.92  								|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.92  								| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 30.18/7.92  								| (223) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.92  								|
% 30.18/7.92  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (186), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.92  									|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.92  									| (220) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 30.18/7.92  									|
% 30.18/7.92  										| Equations (220) can reduce 80 to:
% 30.18/7.92  										| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.92  										|
% 30.18/7.92  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.92  									|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.92  									| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 30.18/7.92  									| (227) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.92  									|
% 30.18/7.92  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (187), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.92  										|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.92  										| (220) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 30.18/7.92  										|
% 30.18/7.93  											| Equations (220) can reduce 80 to:
% 30.18/7.93  											| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  											|
% 30.18/7.93  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  										|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  										| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  										| (231) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.93  										|
% 30.18/7.93  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  											|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  											| (232) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 30.18/7.93  											|
% 30.18/7.93  												| Equations (232) can reduce 88 to:
% 30.18/7.93  												| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  												|
% 30.18/7.93  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  											|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  											| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  											| (235) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.93  											|
% 30.18/7.93  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  												|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  												| (232) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 30.18/7.93  												|
% 30.18/7.93  													| Equations (232) can reduce 88 to:
% 30.18/7.93  													| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  													|
% 30.18/7.93  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  												|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  												| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  												| (239) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.93  												|
% 30.18/7.93  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  													|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  													| (232) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 30.18/7.93  													|
% 30.18/7.93  														| Equations (232) can reduce 88 to:
% 30.18/7.93  														| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  														|
% 30.18/7.93  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  													|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  													| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  													| (243) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.93  													|
% 30.18/7.93  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (193), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  														|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  														| (244) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 30.18/7.93  														|
% 30.18/7.93  															| Equations (244) can reduce 72 to:
% 30.18/7.93  															| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  															|
% 30.18/7.93  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  														|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  														| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  														| (247) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.93  														|
% 30.18/7.93  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  															|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  															| (244) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 30.18/7.93  															|
% 30.18/7.93  																| Equations (244) can reduce 72 to:
% 30.18/7.93  																| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  																|
% 30.18/7.93  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  															|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  															| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  															| (251) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.93  															|
% 30.18/7.93  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  																|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  																| (220) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 30.18/7.93  																|
% 30.18/7.93  																	| Equations (220) can reduce 80 to:
% 30.18/7.93  																	| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  																	|
% 30.18/7.93  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  																|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  																| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  																| (255) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.93  																|
% 30.18/7.93  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  																	|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  																	| (256) all_24_0_14 = 0
% 30.18/7.93  																	|
% 30.18/7.93  																		| Equations (256) can reduce 84 to:
% 30.18/7.93  																		| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  																		|
% 30.18/7.93  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  																	|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  																	| (84)  ~ (all_24_0_14 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  																	| (259) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.93  																	|
% 30.18/7.93  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (189), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  																		|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  																		| (256) all_24_0_14 = 0
% 30.18/7.93  																		|
% 30.18/7.93  																			| Equations (256) can reduce 84 to:
% 30.18/7.93  																			| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  																			|
% 30.18/7.93  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  																		|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  																		| (84)  ~ (all_24_0_14 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  																		| (263) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.93  																		|
% 30.18/7.93  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (190), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  																			|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  																			| (256) all_24_0_14 = 0
% 30.18/7.93  																			|
% 30.18/7.93  																				| Equations (256) can reduce 84 to:
% 30.18/7.93  																				| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  																				|
% 30.18/7.93  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  																			|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  																			| (84)  ~ (all_24_0_14 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  																			| (267) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.93  																			|
% 30.18/7.93  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (192), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  																				|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  																				| (256) all_24_0_14 = 0
% 30.18/7.93  																				|
% 30.18/7.93  																					| Equations (256) can reduce 84 to:
% 30.18/7.93  																					| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  																					|
% 30.18/7.93  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  																				|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  																				| (84)  ~ (all_24_0_14 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  																				| (271) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.93  																				|
% 30.18/7.93  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  																					|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  																					| (272)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  																					|
% 30.18/7.93  																						| Using (209) and (272) yields:
% 30.18/7.93  																						| (144) $false
% 30.18/7.93  																						|
% 30.18/7.93  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  																					|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  																					| (209) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 30.18/7.93  																					| (275)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_5_5) = v1)
% 30.18/7.93  																					|
% 30.18/7.93  																						| Instantiating (275) with all_132_0_37, all_132_1_38 yields:
% 30.18/7.93  																						| (276)  ~ (all_132_0_37 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_132_1_38 & apart_point_and_line(all_132_1_38, all_1_5_5) = all_132_0_37
% 30.18/7.93  																						|
% 30.18/7.93  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (276) yields:
% 30.18/7.93  																						| (277)  ~ (all_132_0_37 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  																						| (278) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_132_1_38
% 30.18/7.93  																						| (279) apart_point_and_line(all_132_1_38, all_1_5_5) = all_132_0_37
% 30.18/7.93  																						|
% 30.18/7.93  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (196), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  																						|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  																						| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.93  																						|
% 30.18/7.93  																							| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.93  																							| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  																							|
% 30.18/7.93  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  																						|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  																						| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  																						| (283) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.93  																						|
% 30.18/7.93  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.93  																							|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.93  																							| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.93  																							|
% 30.18/7.93  																								| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.93  																								| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.93  																								|
% 30.18/7.93  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.93  																							|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.93  																							| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.93  																							| (287) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.94  																							|
% 30.18/7.94  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.94  																								|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.94  																								| (211) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																								|
% 30.18/7.94  																									| Equations (211) can reduce 68 to:
% 30.18/7.94  																									| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.94  																									|
% 30.18/7.94  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.94  																								|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.94  																								| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																								| (291)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.94  																								|
% 30.18/7.94  																									| Instantiating (291) with all_143_0_39, all_143_1_40, all_143_2_41, all_143_3_42 yields:
% 30.18/7.94  																									| (292) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_143_0_39 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_143_1_40 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_143_2_41 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = all_143_3_42 & ( ~ (all_143_2_41 = 0) |  ~ (all_143_3_42 = 0) | all_143_0_39 = 0 | all_143_1_40 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																									|
% 30.18/7.94  																									| Applying alpha-rule on (292) yields:
% 30.18/7.94  																									| (293) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_143_1_40
% 30.18/7.94  																									| (294) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = all_143_3_42
% 30.18/7.94  																									| (295) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_143_0_39
% 30.18/7.94  																									| (296) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_143_2_41
% 30.18/7.94  																									| (297)  ~ (all_143_2_41 = 0) |  ~ (all_143_3_42 = 0) | all_143_0_39 = 0 | all_143_1_40 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																									|
% 30.18/7.94  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (239), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.94  																									|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.94  																									| (211) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																									|
% 30.18/7.94  																										| Equations (211) can reduce 68 to:
% 30.18/7.94  																										| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.94  																										|
% 30.18/7.94  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.94  																									|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.94  																									| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																									| (301)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.94  																									|
% 30.18/7.94  																										| Instantiating (301) with all_148_0_43, all_148_1_44, all_148_2_45, all_148_3_46 yields:
% 30.18/7.94  																										| (302) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_148_1_44 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_148_0_43 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_148_2_45 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_148_3_46 & ( ~ (all_148_2_45 = 0) |  ~ (all_148_3_46 = 0) | all_148_0_43 = 0 | all_148_1_44 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																										|
% 30.18/7.94  																										| Applying alpha-rule on (302) yields:
% 30.18/7.94  																										| (303) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_148_1_44
% 30.18/7.94  																										| (304) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_148_0_43
% 30.18/7.94  																										| (305) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_148_3_46
% 30.18/7.94  																										| (306) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_148_2_45
% 30.18/7.94  																										| (307)  ~ (all_148_2_45 = 0) |  ~ (all_148_3_46 = 0) | all_148_0_43 = 0 | all_148_1_44 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																										|
% 30.18/7.94  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (247), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.94  																										|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.94  																										| (211) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																										|
% 30.18/7.94  																											| Equations (211) can reduce 68 to:
% 30.18/7.94  																											| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.94  																											|
% 30.18/7.94  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.94  																										|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.94  																										| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																										| (311)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.94  																										|
% 30.18/7.94  																											| Instantiating (311) with all_153_0_47, all_153_1_48, all_153_2_49, all_153_3_50 yields:
% 30.18/7.94  																											| (312) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_153_1_48 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_153_0_47 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_153_2_49 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = all_153_3_50 & ( ~ (all_153_2_49 = 0) |  ~ (all_153_3_50 = 0) | all_153_0_47 = 0 | all_153_1_48 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																											|
% 30.18/7.94  																											| Applying alpha-rule on (312) yields:
% 30.18/7.94  																											| (313) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_153_1_48
% 30.18/7.94  																											| (314) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_153_2_49
% 30.18/7.94  																											| (315) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_153_0_47
% 30.18/7.94  																											| (316) distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = all_153_3_50
% 30.18/7.94  																											| (317)  ~ (all_153_2_49 = 0) |  ~ (all_153_3_50 = 0) | all_153_0_47 = 0 | all_153_1_48 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																											|
% 30.18/7.94  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (255), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.94  																											|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.94  																											| (211) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																											|
% 30.18/7.94  																												| Equations (211) can reduce 68 to:
% 30.18/7.94  																												| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.94  																												|
% 30.18/7.94  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.94  																											|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.94  																											| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																											| (321)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.94  																											|
% 30.18/7.94  																												| Instantiating (321) with all_158_0_51, all_158_1_52, all_158_2_53, all_158_3_54 yields:
% 30.18/7.94  																												| (322) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_158_0_51 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_158_1_52 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_158_2_53 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = all_158_3_54 & ( ~ (all_158_2_53 = 0) |  ~ (all_158_3_54 = 0) | all_158_0_51 = 0 | all_158_1_52 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																												|
% 30.18/7.94  																												| Applying alpha-rule on (322) yields:
% 30.18/7.94  																												| (323) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_158_2_53
% 30.18/7.94  																												| (324)  ~ (all_158_2_53 = 0) |  ~ (all_158_3_54 = 0) | all_158_0_51 = 0 | all_158_1_52 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																												| (325) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_158_1_52
% 30.18/7.94  																												| (326) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = all_158_3_54
% 30.18/7.94  																												| (327) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_158_0_51
% 30.18/7.94  																												|
% 30.18/7.94  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (267), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.94  																												|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.94  																												| (211) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																												|
% 30.18/7.94  																													| Equations (211) can reduce 68 to:
% 30.18/7.94  																													| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.94  																													|
% 30.18/7.94  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.94  																												|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.94  																												| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																												| (331)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.94  																												|
% 30.18/7.94  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (271), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.94  																													|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.94  																													| (211) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																													|
% 30.18/7.94  																														| Equations (211) can reduce 68 to:
% 30.18/7.94  																														| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.94  																														|
% 30.18/7.94  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.94  																													|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.94  																													| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																													| (335)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.94  																													|
% 30.18/7.94  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (161), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.94  																														|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.94  																														| (244) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																														|
% 30.18/7.94  																															| Equations (244) can reduce 72 to:
% 30.18/7.94  																															| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.94  																															|
% 30.18/7.94  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.94  																														|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.94  																														| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																														| (339)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.94  																														|
% 30.18/7.94  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (180), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.94  																															|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.94  																															| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																															|
% 30.18/7.94  																																| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.94  																																| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.94  																																|
% 30.18/7.94  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.94  																															|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.94  																															| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																															| (343)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.94  																															|
% 30.18/7.94  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.94  																																|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.94  																																| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.94  																																|
% 30.18/7.94  																																	| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.94  																																	| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.94  																																	|
% 30.18/7.94  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.94  																																|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.94  																																| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																																| (347)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.18/7.94  																																|
% 30.18/7.94  																																	| Instantiating (347) with all_191_0_71, all_191_1_72, all_191_2_73 yields:
% 30.18/7.94  																																	| (348) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_191_0_71 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_191_1_72 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_191_2_73 & ( ~ (all_191_2_73 = 0) | all_191_0_71 = 0 | all_191_1_72 = 0)
% 30.18/7.94  																																	|
% 30.18/7.94  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (348) yields:
% 30.18/7.94  																																	| (349) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_191_0_71
% 30.18/7.94  																																	| (350) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_191_1_72
% 30.18/7.94  																																	| (351) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_191_2_73
% 30.18/7.94  																																	| (352)  ~ (all_191_2_73 = 0) | all_191_0_71 = 0 | all_191_1_72 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																	|
% 30.18/7.95  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																	|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																	| (232) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																	|
% 30.18/7.95  																																		| Equations (232) can reduce 88 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																		| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																		|
% 30.18/7.95  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																	|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																	| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																	| (356)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																	|
% 30.18/7.95  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (166), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																		|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																		| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																		|
% 30.18/7.95  																																			| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																			| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																			|
% 30.18/7.95  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																		|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																		| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																		| (360) all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																		|
% 30.18/7.95  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (167), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																			|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																			| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																			|
% 30.18/7.95  																																				| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																				| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																				|
% 30.18/7.95  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																			|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																			| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																			| (364) all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																			|
% 30.18/7.95  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (181), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																				|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																				| (232) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																				|
% 30.18/7.95  																																					| Equations (232) can reduce 88 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																					| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																					|
% 30.18/7.95  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																				|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																				| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																				| (368) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																				|
% 30.18/7.95  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (168), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																					|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																					| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																					|
% 30.18/7.95  																																						| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																						| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																						|
% 30.18/7.95  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																					|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																					| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																					| (372) all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																					|
% 30.18/7.95  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (169), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																						|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																						| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																						|
% 30.18/7.95  																																							| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																							| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																							|
% 30.18/7.95  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																						|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																						| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																						| (376) all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																						|
% 30.18/7.95  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (172), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																							|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																							| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																							|
% 30.18/7.95  																																								| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																								| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																								|
% 30.18/7.95  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																							|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																							| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																							| (380) all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																							|
% 30.18/7.95  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (170), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																								|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																								| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																								|
% 30.18/7.95  																																									| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																									| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																									|
% 30.18/7.95  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																								|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																								| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																								| (384) all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																								|
% 30.18/7.95  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (182), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																									|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																									| (232) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																									|
% 30.18/7.95  																																										| Equations (232) can reduce 88 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																										| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																										|
% 30.18/7.95  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																									|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																									| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																									| (388) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																									|
% 30.18/7.95  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (183), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																										|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																										| (232) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																										|
% 30.18/7.95  																																											| Equations (232) can reduce 88 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																											| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																											|
% 30.18/7.95  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																										|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																										| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																										| (392) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																										|
% 30.18/7.95  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (174), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																											|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																											| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																											|
% 30.18/7.95  																																												| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																												| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																												|
% 30.18/7.95  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																											|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																											| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																											| (396) all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																											|
% 30.18/7.95  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (175), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																												|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																												| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																												|
% 30.18/7.95  																																													| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																													| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																													|
% 30.18/7.95  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																												|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																												| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																												| (400) all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																												|
% 30.18/7.95  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (184), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																													|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																													| (232) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																													|
% 30.18/7.95  																																														| Equations (232) can reduce 88 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																														| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																														|
% 30.18/7.95  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																													|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																													| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																													| (404) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																													|
% 30.18/7.95  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (157), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																														|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																														| (220) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																														|
% 30.18/7.95  																																															| Equations (220) can reduce 80 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																															| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																															|
% 30.18/7.95  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																														|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																														| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																														| (408) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																														|
% 30.18/7.95  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (176), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																															|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																															| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																															|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																																|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																															|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																															| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																															| (412) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																															|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (177), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																																|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																																|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																	| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																	| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																																	|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																																|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																																| (416) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																																|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (171), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																	| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																																	|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																		| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																		| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																																		|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																	| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																																	| (420) all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																																	|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (173), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																		| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																																		|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																			| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																			| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																																			|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																		| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																																		| (424) all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.95  																																																		|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (178), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.95  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																			| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.95  																																																			|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																				| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																				| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.95  																																																				|
% 30.18/7.95  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.95  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.95  																																																			| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.95  																																																			| (428) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																			|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (179), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																				| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																				|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																					| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																					| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																					|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																				| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																				| (432) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																				|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (160), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																					| (220) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																					|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																						| Equations (220) can reduce 80 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																						| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																						|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																					| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																					| (436) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																					|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (158), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																						| (220) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																						|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																							| Equations (220) can reduce 80 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																							| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																							|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																						| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																						| (440) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																						|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (159), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																							| (220) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																							|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																								| Equations (220) can reduce 80 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																								| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																								|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																							| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																							| (444) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																							|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (164), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																								| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																								|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																									| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																									| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																									|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																								| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																								| (448) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																								|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (162), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																									| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																									|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																										| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																										| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																										|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																									| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																									| (452) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																									|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (163), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																										| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																										|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																											| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																											| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																											|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																										| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																										| (456) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																										|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (165), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																											| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																											|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																												| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																												| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																												|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																											| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																											| (460) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																											|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (155), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																												| (244) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																												|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																													| Equations (244) can reduce 72 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																													| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																													|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																												| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																												| (464) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																												|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (156), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																													| (244) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																													|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																														| Equations (244) can reduce 72 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																														| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																														|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																													| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																													| (468) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																													|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																														| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																														|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																															| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																															| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																															|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																														| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																														| (472) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																														|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (195), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																															| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																															|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																															| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																															| (476) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																															|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																| (211) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| Equations (211) can reduce 68 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																| (480)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| Instantiating (480) with all_369_0_81, all_369_1_82, all_369_2_83, all_369_3_84 yields:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| (481) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_369_1_82 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_369_0_81 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_369_2_83 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = all_369_3_84 & ( ~ (all_369_2_83 = 0) |  ~ (all_369_3_84 = 0) | all_369_0_81 = 0 | all_369_1_82 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (481) yields:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| (482) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_369_1_82
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| (483)  ~ (all_369_2_83 = 0) |  ~ (all_369_3_84 = 0) | all_369_0_81 = 0 | all_369_1_82 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| (484) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_369_0_81
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| (485) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_369_2_83
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| (486) distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = all_369_3_84
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| (211) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| Equations (211) can reduce 68 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	| (490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																	|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| Instantiating (490) with all_374_0_85, all_374_1_86, all_374_2_87, all_374_3_88 yields:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| (491) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_374_1_86 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_374_0_85 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_374_2_87 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = all_374_3_88 & ( ~ (all_374_2_87 = 0) |  ~ (all_374_3_88 = 0) | all_374_0_85 = 0 | all_374_1_86 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (491) yields:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| (492)  ~ (all_374_2_87 = 0) |  ~ (all_374_3_88 = 0) | all_374_0_85 = 0 | all_374_1_86 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| (493) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_374_0_85
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| (494) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_374_2_87
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| (495) distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = all_374_3_88
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| (496) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_374_1_86
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (408), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| (244) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																			| Equations (244) can reduce 72 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																			| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																			|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		| (500)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																		|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (412), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																			| (244) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																			|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																				| Equations (244) can reduce 72 to:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																				| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																				|
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																			| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 30.18/7.96  																																																																			| (504)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																			|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				| Instantiating (504) with all_414_0_117, all_414_1_118, all_414_2_119, all_414_3_120 yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				| (505) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = all_414_1_118 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_414_0_117 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_414_2_119 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = all_414_3_120 & ( ~ (all_414_2_119 = 0) |  ~ (all_414_3_120 = 0) | all_414_0_117 = 0 | all_414_1_118 = 0)
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (505) yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				| (506) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = all_414_1_118
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				| (507) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_414_0_117
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				| (508)  ~ (all_414_2_119 = 0) |  ~ (all_414_3_120 = 0) | all_414_0_117 = 0 | all_414_1_118 = 0
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				| (509) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_414_2_119
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				| (510) distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_1_1) = all_414_3_120
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (416), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				| (244) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| Equations (244) can reduce 72 to:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				| (514)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																				|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| Instantiating (514) with all_419_0_121, all_419_1_122, all_419_2_123, all_419_3_124 yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| (515) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = all_419_0_121 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_419_1_122 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_419_2_123 & distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = all_419_3_124 & ( ~ (all_419_2_123 = 0) |  ~ (all_419_3_124 = 0) | all_419_0_121 = 0 | all_419_1_122 = 0)
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (515) yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| (516) distinct_points(all_1_1_1, all_18_1_9) = all_419_3_124
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| (517) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = all_419_0_121
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| (518)  ~ (all_419_2_123 = 0) |  ~ (all_419_3_124 = 0) | all_419_0_121 = 0 | all_419_1_122 = 0
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| (519) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_419_1_122
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| (520) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_419_2_123
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (440), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| (244) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| Equations (244) can reduce 72 to:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					| (524)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																					|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| Instantiating (524) with all_429_0_129, all_429_1_130, all_429_2_131, all_429_3_132 yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| (525) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_429_0_129 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = all_429_1_130 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_429_2_131 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = all_429_3_132 & ( ~ (all_429_2_131 = 0) |  ~ (all_429_3_132 = 0) | all_429_0_129 = 0 | all_429_1_130 = 0)
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (525) yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| (526) distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = all_429_3_132
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| (527)  ~ (all_429_2_131 = 0) |  ~ (all_429_3_132 = 0) | all_429_0_129 = 0 | all_429_1_130 = 0
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| (528) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = all_429_1_130
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| (529) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_429_2_131
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| (530) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_429_0_129
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (444), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| (244) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Equations (244) can reduce 72 to:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						| (534)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																						|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating (534) with all_434_0_133, all_434_1_134, all_434_2_135, all_434_3_136 yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (535) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_434_1_134 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = all_434_0_133 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_434_2_135 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = all_434_3_136 & ( ~ (all_434_2_135 = 0) |  ~ (all_434_3_136 = 0) | all_434_0_133 = 0 | all_434_1_134 = 0)
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (535) yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (536)  ~ (all_434_2_135 = 0) |  ~ (all_434_3_136 = 0) | all_434_0_133 = 0 | all_434_1_134 = 0
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (537) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = all_434_0_133
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (538) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_434_2_135
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (539) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_434_1_134
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (540) distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = all_434_3_136
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_132_1_38, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_132_1_38, intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (541) all_132_1_38 = all_1_1_1
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_419_1_122, all_34_0_24 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_419_1_122, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (542) all_419_1_122 = all_34_0_24
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_414_0_117, all_419_1_122 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_419_1_122, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_414_0_117, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (543) all_419_1_122 = all_414_0_117
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_87_0_34, all_419_1_122 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_419_1_122, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_87_0_34, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (544) all_419_1_122 = all_87_0_34
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_87_1_35, all_132_0_37 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_87_1_35, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (545) all_132_0_37 = all_87_1_35 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_132_0_37)
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_87_1_35, all_419_1_122 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_419_1_122, apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_87_1_35, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (546) all_419_1_122 = all_87_1_35
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_374_0_85, all_26_0_16 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_374_0_85, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (547) all_374_0_85 = all_26_0_16
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_191_0_71, all_369_0_81 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_369_0_81, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_191_0_71, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (548) all_369_0_81 = all_191_0_71
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_191_1_72, all_374_0_85 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_374_0_85, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_191_1_72, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (549) all_374_0_85 = all_191_1_72
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_191_1_72, all_191_0_71 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_191_0_71, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_191_1_72, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (550) all_191_0_71 = all_191_1_72
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_158_1_52, all_369_0_81 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_369_0_81, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_158_1_52, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (551) all_369_0_81 = all_158_1_52
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_148_1_44, all_374_0_85 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_374_0_85, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_148_1_44, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (552) all_374_0_85 = all_148_1_44
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_143_1_40, all_191_1_72 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_191_1_72, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_143_1_40, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (553) all_191_1_72 = all_143_1_40
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_153_0_47, all_16_0_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_153_0_47, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (554) all_153_0_47 = all_16_0_6
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_148_0_43, all_153_0_47 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_153_0_47, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_148_0_43, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (555) all_153_0_47 = all_148_0_43
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (14) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_414_2_119, all_429_2_131 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_429_2_131, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_414_2_119, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (556) all_429_2_131 = all_414_2_119
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (14) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_374_2_87, all_434_2_135 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_434_2_135, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_374_2_87, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (557) all_434_2_135 = all_374_2_87
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (14) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_374_2_87, all_414_2_119 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_414_2_119, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_374_2_87, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (558) all_414_2_119 = all_374_2_87
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (14) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_148_2_45, all_429_2_131 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_429_2_131, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_148_2_45, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (559) all_429_2_131 = all_148_2_45
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (14) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_143_2_41, all_434_2_135 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_434_2_135, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_143_2_41, yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (560) all_434_2_135 = all_143_2_41
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Combining equations (557,560) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (561) all_374_2_87 = all_143_2_41
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Simplifying 561 yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (562) all_374_2_87 = all_143_2_41
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Combining equations (556,559) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (563) all_414_2_119 = all_148_2_45
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Simplifying 563 yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (564) all_414_2_119 = all_148_2_45
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Combining equations (544,543) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (565) all_414_0_117 = all_87_0_34
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Combining equations (542,543) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (566) all_414_0_117 = all_34_0_24
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Combining equations (546,543) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (567) all_414_0_117 = all_87_1_35
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Combining equations (566,565) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (568) all_87_0_34 = all_34_0_24
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Combining equations (567,565) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (569) all_87_0_34 = all_87_1_35
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Combining equations (558,564) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (570) all_374_2_87 = all_148_2_45
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Simplifying 570 yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (571) all_374_2_87 = all_148_2_45
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Combining equations (547,552) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (572) all_148_1_44 = all_26_0_16
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Combining equations (549,552) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (573) all_191_1_72 = all_148_1_44
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| Simplifying 573 yields:
% 30.18/7.97  																																																																							| (574) all_191_1_72 = all_148_1_44
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Combining equations (562,571) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (575) all_148_2_45 = all_143_2_41
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Combining equations (548,551) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (576) all_191_0_71 = all_158_1_52
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Simplifying 576 yields:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (577) all_191_0_71 = all_158_1_52
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Combining equations (550,577) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (578) all_191_1_72 = all_158_1_52
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Simplifying 578 yields:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (579) all_191_1_72 = all_158_1_52
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Combining equations (553,579) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (580) all_158_1_52 = all_143_1_40
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Combining equations (574,579) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (581) all_158_1_52 = all_148_1_44
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Combining equations (581,580) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (582) all_148_1_44 = all_143_1_40
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Simplifying 582 yields:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (583) all_148_1_44 = all_143_1_40
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Combining equations (554,555) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (584) all_148_0_43 = all_16_0_6
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Combining equations (572,583) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (585) all_143_1_40 = all_26_0_16
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Combining equations (569,568) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (586) all_87_1_35 = all_34_0_24
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| Simplifying 586 yields:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (587) all_87_1_35 = all_34_0_24
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| From (541) and (279) follows:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (588) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_132_0_37
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| From (585) and (293) follows:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (134) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| From (584) and (304) follows:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (137) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| From (575) and (306) follows:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (296) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_143_2_41
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (592)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_132_0_37)
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								| Using (588) and (592) yields:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								| (144) $false
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (588) apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = all_132_0_37
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							| (595) all_132_0_37 = all_87_1_35
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																							|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								| Combining equations (587,595) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								| (596) all_132_0_37 = all_34_0_24
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								| Equations (596) can reduce 277 to:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								| (597)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								| (598) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																									| Equations (598) can reduce 597 to:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																									| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																									|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								| (597)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								| (601) all_32_0_22 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																								|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (601), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																									| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																									|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| Equations (280) can reduce 210 to:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																									| (210)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																									| (605)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																									|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| Instantiating (605) with all_490_0_157, all_490_1_158, all_490_2_159 yields:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (606) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_490_0_157 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_490_1_158 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_490_2_159 & ( ~ (all_490_2_159 = 0) | all_490_0_157 = 0 | all_490_1_158 = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (606) yields:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (607) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_490_0_157
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (608) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_490_1_158
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (609) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_490_2_159
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (610)  ~ (all_490_2_159 = 0) | all_490_0_157 = 0 | all_490_1_158 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_490_0_157, all_26_0_16 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_490_0_157, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (611) all_490_0_157 = all_26_0_16
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| Instantiating formula (8) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_490_1_158, all_16_0_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_490_1_158, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (612) all_490_1_158 = all_16_0_6
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| Instantiating formula (14) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_490_2_159, all_143_2_41 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_490_2_159, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_143_2_41, yields:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (613) all_490_2_159 = all_143_2_41
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| From (613) and (609) follows:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (296) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_143_2_41
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (232) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																											| Equations (232) can reduce 88 to:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																											| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																											|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										| (618) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																										|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (618), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																											| (211) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																											|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																												| Equations (211) can reduce 68 to:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																												| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																												|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																											| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																											| (622)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																											|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (610), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																												| (623)  ~ (all_490_2_159 = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																												|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													| Equations (613) can reduce 623 to:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													| (624)  ~ (all_143_2_41 = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (33) with all_143_2_41, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_143_2_41,  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = 0), yields:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													| (625) all_143_2_41 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													| Equations (625) can reduce 624 to:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																												| (627) all_490_2_159 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																												| (628) all_490_0_157 = 0 | all_490_1_158 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																												|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (628), into two cases.
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													| (629) all_490_0_157 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														| Combining equations (629,611) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														| (232) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														| Equations (232) can reduce 88 to:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													| (632)  ~ (all_490_0_157 = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													| (633) all_490_1_158 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																													|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														| Combining equations (633,612) yields a new equation:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														| (211) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														| Equations (211) can reduce 68 to:
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														|
% 30.18/7.98  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.98  						|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.98  						| (280) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  						| (637)  ~ (all_32_1_23 = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  						|
% 30.18/7.98  							| Equations (202) can reduce 637 to:
% 30.18/7.98  							| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.98  							|
% 30.18/7.98  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.98  			|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.98  			| (639) all_28_0_18 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  			| (640)  ~ (all_28_1_19 = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  			|
% 30.18/7.98  				| Equations (131) can reduce 640 to:
% 30.18/7.98  				| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.98  				|
% 30.18/7.98  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.98  		|-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.98  		| (642) all_30_0_20 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  		| (643)  ~ (all_30_1_21 = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  		|
% 30.18/7.98  			| Equations (127) can reduce 643 to:
% 30.18/7.98  			| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.98  			|
% 30.18/7.98  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.98  |-Branch two:
% 30.18/7.98  | (645)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0)
% 30.18/7.98  | (108) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 30.18/7.98  |
% 30.18/7.98  	| Equations (108) can reduce 52 to:
% 30.18/7.98  	| (109) $false
% 30.18/7.98  	|
% 30.18/7.98  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.18/7.98  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 30.18/7.98  
% 30.18/7.98  7382ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------