↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO198+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:26 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 43.41s 43.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 43.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : GEO198+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 08:43:24 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.50  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 43.41/43.45  %-------------------------------------------
% 43.41/43.45  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 43.41/43.45  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 43.41/43.45  % Transform   :cnf
% 43.41/43.45  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 43.41/43.45  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 43.41/43.45  
% 43.41/43.45  % Result      :Theorem 42.900000s
% 43.41/43.45  % Output      :CNFRefutation 42.900000s
% 43.41/43.45  %-------------------------------------------
% 43.41/43.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 43.41/43.46  % File     : GEO198+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 43.41/43.46  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 43.41/43.46  % Problem  : Corollary to symmetry of incidence
% 43.41/43.46  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 43.41/43.46  % English  : If the lines X, Y, and Z are pairwise convergent, and the
% 43.41/43.46  %            intersection point of X and Y is incident with Z, then the
% 43.41/43.46  %            intersection point of X and Z is incident with Y.
% 43.41/43.46  
% 43.41/43.46  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 43.41/43.46  %          : [Li97]  Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 43.41/43.46  %          : [Li98]  Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 43.41/43.46  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 43.41/43.46  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 43.41/43.46  % Names    :
% 43.41/43.46  
% 43.41/43.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 43.41/43.46  % Rating   : 0.06 v8.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.08 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.4.0, 0.22 v5.3.0, 0.30 v5.2.0, 0.21 v5.0.0, 0.15 v4.1.0, 0.17 v4.0.1, 0.16 v4.0.0, 0.20 v3.7.0, 0.29 v3.5.0, 0.25 v3.4.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 43.41/43.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 43.41/43.46  %            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
% 43.41/43.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
% 43.41/43.46  %            Number of connectives :   31 (   5   ~;   9   |;   5   &)
% 43.41/43.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 43.41/43.46  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 43.41/43.46  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 43.41/43.46  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 43.41/43.46  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 43.41/43.46  %            Number of variables   :   33 (  33   !;   0   ?)
% 43.41/43.46  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 43.41/43.46  
% 43.41/43.46  % Comments :  Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 43.41/43.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 43.41/43.46  include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 43.41/43.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 43.41/43.46  fof(con,conjecture,
% 43.41/43.46      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 43.41/43.46        ( ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
% 43.41/43.46          & convergent_lines(Z,Y)
% 43.41/43.46          & convergent_lines(X,Z)
% 43.41/43.46          & ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Z) )
% 43.41/43.46       => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Z),Y) ) ).
% 43.41/43.46  
% 43.41/43.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 43.41/43.46  %-------------------------------------------
% 43.41/43.46  % Proof found
% 43.41/43.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 43.41/43.46  % SZS output start Proof
% 43.41/43.46  %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:0)
% 43.41/43.46  %VarNum:80(SingletonVarNum:36)
% 43.41/43.46  %MaxLitNum:6
% 43.41/43.46  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 43.41/43.46  %SharedTerms:10
% 43.41/43.46  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 8
% 43.41/43.46  %singleGoalClaCount:5
% 43.41/43.46  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 43.41/43.46  [2]P1(a1,a3)
% 43.41/43.46  [3]P1(a3,a2)
% 43.41/43.46  [4]P2(f4(a1,a3),a2)
% 43.41/43.46  [8]~P2(f4(a1,a2),a3)
% 43.41/43.46  [5]~P3(x51,x51)
% 43.41/43.46  [6]~P4(x61,x61)
% 43.41/43.46  [7]~P1(x71,x71)
% 43.41/43.46  [9]~P1(x91,x92)+P4(x91,x92)
% 43.41/43.46  [10]~P3(x103,x101)+P3(x101,x102)+P3(x103,x102)
% 43.41/43.46  [11]~P2(x111,x113)+P3(x111,x112)+P2(x112,x113)
% 43.41/43.46  [12]~P4(x123,x121)+P4(x121,x122)+P4(x123,x122)
% 43.41/43.46  [13]~P2(x133,x131)+P4(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x132)
% 43.41/43.46  [14]~P1(x143,x141)+P1(x141,x142)+P1(x143,x142)
% 43.41/43.46  [15]~P1(x152,x153)+~P2(x151,x153)+P3(x151,f4(x152,x153))
% 43.41/43.46  [16]~P1(x162,x163)+~P2(x161,x162)+P3(x161,f4(x162,x163))
% 43.41/43.46  [17]P3(x171,x172)+~P3(x173,x172)+~P2(x171,f5(x173,x172))
% 43.41/43.46  [18]P3(x181,x182)+~P3(x182,x183)+~P2(x181,f5(x182,x183))
% 43.41/43.46  [19]P2(x194,x193)+~P3(x194,x191)+~P4(x193,x192)+P2(x191,x192)+P2(x191,x193)+P2(x194,x192)
% 43.41/43.46  %EqnAxiom
% 43.41/43.46  
% 43.41/43.46  %-------------------------------------------
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(20,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (P1(a2,a1)),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7,14])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(24,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P3(x241,x241)),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(26,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P2(f4(a1,a2),a1)),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,24,7,14,15,16])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(27,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P3(x271,x271)),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(31,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (P3(f4(a1,a2),f4(a1,a3))),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,5,24,27,7,14,15,16,11,10])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(34,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (P4(a3,a1)),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,6,9,12])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(38,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P2(f4(a1,a3),a1)),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,34,5,6,12,16])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(39,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P3(x391,x391)),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(44,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P2(f4(a1,a3),a3)),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,34,5,39,6,7,12,16,14,15])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(55,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P2(f4(a1,a2),f5(f4(a1,a2),f4(a1,a3)))),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[31,5,18,10])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(60,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (P1(a2,a3)),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,7,14])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(90,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P2(f4(a1,a3),f5(f4(a1,a2),f4(a1,a3)))),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[31,5,10,17])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(99,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (P3(f4(a1,a3),f4(a2,a3))),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,5,60,11,16])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(100,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (P3(f4(a2,a3),f4(a1,a3))),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[99,5,10])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(103,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P2(f4(a1,a3),f5(f4(a2,a3),f4(a1,a3)))),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,100,11,17])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(109,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (P3(f4(a1,a3),f4(a2,a1))),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,5,20,11,16])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(110,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (P3(f4(a2,a1),f4(a1,a3))),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[109,5,10])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(119,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P2(f4(a2,a3),f5(f4(a2,a3),f4(a1,a3)))),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,100,11,18])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(128,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P2(f4(a2,a3),a3)),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,3,5,14,15])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(130,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P2(f4(a2,a1),a1)),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,5,15])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(1030,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P4(a3,f5(f4(a1,a2),f4(a1,a3)))),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[55,8,44,90,31,19])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(1033,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (P4(a1,f5(f4(a1,a2),f4(a1,a3)))),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[1030,34,12])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(1035,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (P2(f4(a2,a1),a3)),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[130,44,1030,38,34,110,12,19])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(1062,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     (~P4(a3,f5(f4(a2,a3),f4(a1,a3)))),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[128,44,100,1035,1033,1030,103,119,6,12,13,19])).
% 43.41/43.47  cnf(1079,plain,
% 43.41/43.47     ($false),
% 43.41/43.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,44,1035,31,1062,26,38,34,12,13,19]),
% 43.41/43.47     ['proof']).
% 43.41/43.47  % SZS output end Proof
% 43.41/43.47  % Total time :42.900000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------