%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : GEO200+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:08:37 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.40s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.08/0.14 % Problem : GEO200+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.08/0.15 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 15:42:37 EDT 2022 % 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime : % 0.15/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.15/0.39 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.15/0.39 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.15/0.39 # % 0.15/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.15/0.39 # Number of axioms: 16 Number of unprocessed: 16 % 0.15/0.39 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.15/0.39 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.15/0.39 # Hello from C++ % 0.15/0.39 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.15/0.39 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.15/0.39 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.15/0.39 # 16 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.15/0.39 # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures. % 0.15/0.39 # There are 2 start rule candidates: % 0.15/0.39 # Found 5 unit axioms. % 0.15/0.39 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.15/0.39 # 2 start rule tableaux created. % 0.15/0.39 # 11 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.15/0.39 # 5 unit axiom clauses % 0.15/0.39 % 0.15/0.39 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.15/0.39 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2 % 0.15/0.40 # There were 10 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.15/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.15/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.15/0.40 # There were 5 free duplicated saturations. % 0.15/0.40 # There were 10 total successful branch saturations. % 0.15/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.15/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.15/0.40 # There were 5 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.15/0.40 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.15/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.15/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.15/0.40 % 0.15/0.40 # End clausification derivation % 0.15/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0)))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~distinct_points(X1,X1))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (~distinct_lines(X1,X1))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (~convergent_lines(X1,X1))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (distinct_points(X1,X2)|distinct_points(X3,X2)|~distinct_points(X1,X3))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (distinct_lines(X1,X2)|distinct_lines(X3,X2)|~distinct_lines(X1,X3))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (~apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X1))|~distinct_points(X2,X1))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (~apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2))|~distinct_points(X1,X2))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (~apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X2)|~convergent_lines(X1,X2))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X1)|~convergent_lines(X1,X2))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|distinct_points(X3,X1)|~apart_point_and_line(X3,X2))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (convergent_lines(X1,X2)|distinct_lines(X3,X2)|~convergent_lines(X1,X3))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|distinct_lines(X3,X2)|~apart_point_and_line(X1,X3))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (convergent_lines(X1,X2)|convergent_lines(X3,X2)|~convergent_lines(X1,X3))). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)|~distinct_lines(X2,X3)|~distinct_points(X1,X4))). % 0.15/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.15/0.40 # Begin printing tableau % 0.15/0.40 # Found 8 steps % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (~distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_77, ...])). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_79, ...])). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_80, ...])). % 0.15/0.40 cnf(i_0_131, plain, (~distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_131, ...])). % 0.15/0.40 # End printing tableau % 0.15/0.40 # SZS output end % 0.15/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.15/0.40 # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.15/0.40 # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on % 0.15/0.40 # Found closed tableau during pool population. % 0.15/0.40 # Proof search is over... % 0.15/0.40 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------