%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : GEO200+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:20:17 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.85s 1.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 45 ( 15 unt; 2 def)
% Number of atoms : 124 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 110 ( 47 ~; 54 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 63 ( 0 sgn 61 !; 2 ?; 15 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0] : ~ distinct_points(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart1) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X0,X1)
=> ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X0,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart4) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( distinct_points(X0,X1)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( distinct_points(X0,X1)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
& distinct_points(X0,X1) )
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).
fof(f15,conjecture,
! [X0,X1] :
( distinct_points(X0,X1)
=> ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(X0,X1),line_connecting(X1,X0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(f16,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1] :
( distinct_points(X0,X1)
=> ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(X0,X1),line_connecting(X1,X0)) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f15]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| distinct_points(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X0,X2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f18,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| distinct_points(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X0,X2) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f24,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f28,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f27]) ).
fof(f35,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
( distinct_points(X0,X1)
& distinct_lines(line_connecting(X0,X1),line_connecting(X1,X0)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).
fof(f36,plain,
( distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
& distinct_lines(line_connecting(sK0,sK1),line_connecting(sK1,sK0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f35]) ).
fof(f37,plain,
! [X0] : ~ distinct_points(X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f40,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| distinct_points(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f43,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).
fof(f44,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).
fof(f47,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).
fof(f51,plain,
distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).
fof(f52,plain,
distinct_lines(line_connecting(sK0,sK1),line_connecting(sK1,sK0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).
tcf(c_49,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ~ distinct_points(X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).
tcf(c_52,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X0,X2)
| ~ distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).
tcf(c_55,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).
tcf(c_56,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X0)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X1,X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).
tcf(c_59,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
| ~ distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| ~ distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).
tcf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(line_connecting(sK0,sK1),line_connecting(sK1,sK0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).
tcf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).
tcf(c_67,plain,
~ distinct_points(sK0,sK0),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).
tcf(c_194,definition,
iPr_def_10 = line_connecting(sK0,sK1),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_195,definition,
iPr_def_11 = line_connecting(sK1,sK0),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_196,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).
tcf(c_197,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_195,c_194]) ).
tcf(c_397,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( distinct_points(sK1,X0)
| distinct_points(sK0,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_196,c_52]) ).
tcf(c_400,plain,
( distinct_points(sK1,sK0)
| distinct_points(sK0,sK0) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_397]) ).
tcf(c_455,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_10)
| ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_194,c_55]) ).
tcf(c_456,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(sK1,iPr_def_11)
| ~ distinct_points(sK1,sK0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_195,c_55]) ).
tcf(c_459,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_10),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_455,c_196]) ).
tcf(c_464,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(sK1,iPr_def_10)
| ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_194,c_56]) ).
tcf(c_465,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_11)
| ~ distinct_points(sK1,sK0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_195,c_56]) ).
tcf(c_468,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(sK1,iPr_def_10),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_464,c_196]) ).
tcf(c_644,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( apart_point_and_line(sK1,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(sK1,X0)
| apart_point_and_line(sK0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(sK0,X0)
| ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
| ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_59]) ).
tcf(c_1068,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(sK1,iPr_def_11)
| apart_point_and_line(sK1,iPr_def_10)
| apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_11)
| apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_10)
| ~ distinct_lines(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
| ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_644]) ).
tcf(c_1069,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1068,c_465,c_468,c_456,c_459,c_400,c_197,c_67,c_64]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : GEO200+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.74 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.74 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.74 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.74 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.74 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.74 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.74 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.74 % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 11:26:40 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.74 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.74 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.78 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.78 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.80
% 0.09/0.80 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.80
% 0.14/0.80 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.81 % Proving...
% 1.85/1.66 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.85/1.66 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.85/1.66 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.85/1.66 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 % ------ Parsing...
% 1.85/1.66 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 5 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.85/1.66 % ------ Proving...
% 1.85/1.66 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 %
% 1.85/1.66 % clauses 13
% 1.85/1.66 % conjectures 2
% 1.85/1.66 % EPR 9
% 1.85/1.66 % Horn 8
% 1.85/1.66 % unary 6
% 1.85/1.66 % binary 2
% 1.85/1.66 % lits 28
% 1.85/1.66 % lits eq 2
% 1.85/1.66 % fd_pure 0
% 1.85/1.66 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.85/1.66 % fd_cond 0
% 1.85/1.66 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.85/1.66 % AC symbols 0
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 % ------
% 1.85/1.66 % Current options:
% 1.85/1.66 % ------
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 %
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 % ------ Proving...
% 1.85/1.66 %
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.85/1.66
% 1.85/1.66
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------