%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO204+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 127.59s 127.83s
% Output : Refutation 127.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO204+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 08:41:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.35 Sat Jun 18 08:41:24 2022
% 0.20/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 29096.
% 0.20/0.35
% 0.20/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.35
% 0.20/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.35
% 0.20/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.20/0.35
% 0.20/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.20/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.20/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.20/0.35
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.35
% 0.20/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.35
% 0.20/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.35
% 0.20/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.40/0.57
% 0.40/0.57 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.40/0.57
% 0.40/0.57 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.40/0.57
% 0.40/0.57
% 0.40/0.57 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.40/0.57
% 0.40/0.57 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.40/0.57 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.40/0.57 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.40/0.57 number of clauses in intial UL: 16
% 0.40/0.57 number of clauses initially in problem: 17
% 0.40/0.57 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 94
% 0.40/0.57 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.40/0.57 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.40/0.57 absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.40/0.57 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.40/0.57 distinct function count: 2
% 0.40/0.57 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.40/0.57
% 0.40/0.57 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.40/0.57
% 0.40/0.57
% 0.40/0.57
% 0.40/0.57 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.40/0.57
% 0.40/0.57 =========== start of search ===========
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Changing weight limit from 60 to 42.
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.28/35.52
% 35.28/35.52 Resetting weight limit to 42 after 110 givens.
% 35.28/35.52
% 39.58/39.80
% 39.58/39.80
% 39.58/39.80 Changing weight limit from 42 to 36.
% 39.58/39.80
% 39.58/39.80 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 115 givens.
% 39.58/39.80
% 75.66/75.83
% 75.66/75.83
% 75.66/75.83 Changing weight limit from 36 to 34.
% 75.66/75.83
% 75.66/75.83 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 150 givens.
% 75.66/75.83
% 87.91/88.07
% 87.91/88.07
% 87.91/88.07 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 87.91/88.07
% 87.91/88.07 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 155 givens.
% 87.91/88.07
% 100.47/100.67
% 100.47/100.67
% 100.47/100.67 Changing weight limit from 33 to 34.
% 100.47/100.67
% 100.47/100.67 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 170 givens.
% 100.47/100.67
% 111.54/111.76
% 111.54/111.76
% 111.54/111.76 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 111.54/111.76
% 111.54/111.76 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 175 givens.
% 111.54/111.76
% 112.22/112.46
% 112.22/112.46
% 112.22/112.46 Changing weight limit from 33 to 34.
% 112.22/112.46
% 112.22/112.46 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 180 givens.
% 112.22/112.46
% 125.63/125.79
% 125.63/125.79
% 125.63/125.79 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 125.63/125.79
% 125.63/125.79 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 190 givens.
% 125.63/125.79
% 127.29/127.47
% 127.29/127.47
% 127.29/127.47 Changing weight limit from 33 to 34.
% 127.29/127.47
% 127.29/127.47 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 195 givens.
% 127.29/127.47
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 127.43 sec ----> 7133 [binary,7132.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 Length of proof is 20. Level of proof is 12.
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 127.59/127.83 % SZS status Theorem
% 127.59/127.83 % SZS output start Refutation
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 127.59/127.83 4 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 127.59/127.83 7 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(A,line_connecting(A,B)).
% 127.59/127.83 8 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(B,line_connecting(A,B)).
% 127.59/127.83 11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 127.59/127.83 12 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(C,B).
% 127.59/127.83 15 [] {+} -distinct_points($c2,$c1).
% 127.59/127.83 16 [] {+} -distinct_points($c3,$c1)|distinct_lines(line_connecting($c3,$c2),line_connecting($c3,$c1)).
% 127.59/127.83 17 [] {-} distinct_points($c3,$c2).
% 127.59/127.83 18 [hyper,17,4] {-} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points($c2,A).
% 127.59/127.83 19 [hyper,18,16,unit_del,15] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c3,$c2),line_connecting($c3,$c1)).
% 127.59/127.83 20 [hyper,18,4] {-} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points($c3,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 127.59/127.83 22 [hyper,18,15] {-} distinct_points($c3,$c1).
% 127.59/127.83 30 [hyper,19,11,22] {+} apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c3,$c2))|apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c3,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c2))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c1)).
% 127.59/127.83 39 [hyper,20,1] {-} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points(A,$c3).
% 127.59/127.83 44 [hyper,39,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points($c2,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 127.59/127.83 67 [hyper,44,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points($c2,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 127.59/127.83 68 [hyper,44,1] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,$c2).
% 127.59/127.83 148 [hyper,30,7,68,unit_del,1] {+} apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c3,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c2))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c1)).
% 127.59/127.83 280 [hyper,67,15] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(B,$c1).
% 127.59/127.83 284 [hyper,67,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(B,C)|distinct_points($c2,D)|distinct_points(C,D).
% 127.59/127.83 2539 [hyper,284,1] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(B,C)|distinct_points(C,$c2).
% 127.59/127.83 2584 [hyper,2539,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(B,C)|distinct_points(C,$c2)|distinct_points(A,D)|distinct_points(B,D).
% 127.59/127.83 5042 [hyper,148,7,280,unit_del,1,1] {+} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c2))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c1)).
% 127.59/127.83 5734 [hyper,5042,8,280,unit_del,1,1] {+} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c2)).
% 127.59/127.83 5912 [hyper,5734,12] {+} distinct_points($c1,A)|apart_point_and_line(A,line_connecting($c3,$c2)).
% 127.59/127.83 6574 [hyper,5912,4] {+} apart_point_and_line(A,line_connecting($c3,$c2))|distinct_points($c1,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 127.59/127.83 7075 [hyper,6574,15,unit_del,1] {+} apart_point_and_line($c2,line_connecting($c3,$c2)).
% 127.59/127.83 7132 [hyper,7075,8,2584,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3).
% 127.59/127.83 7133 [binary,7132.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 % SZS output end Refutation
% 127.59/127.83 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 ============ end of search ============
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 true clauses given 46 (23.4%)
% 127.59/127.83 false clauses given 151
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 FALSE TRUE
% 127.59/127.83 8 0 1
% 127.59/127.83 14 0 4
% 127.59/127.83 15 0 1
% 127.59/127.83 18 92 0
% 127.59/127.83 19 22 0
% 127.59/127.83 20 0 1
% 127.59/127.83 21 29 2
% 127.59/127.83 22 0 6
% 127.59/127.83 23 0 6
% 127.59/127.83 24 0 22
% 127.59/127.83 25 0 56
% 127.59/127.83 26 0 23
% 127.59/127.83 27 0 108
% 127.59/127.83 28 0 222
% 127.59/127.83 29 0 97
% 127.59/127.83 30 0 395
% 127.59/127.83 31 0 657
% 127.59/127.83 32 0 245
% 127.59/127.83 33 0 414
% 127.59/127.83 34 0 5
% 127.59/127.83 tot: 143 2265 (94.1% true)
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 Model 1 (0.01 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 127.59/127.83
% 127.59/127.83 Process 29096 finished Sat Jun 18 08:43:32 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------