%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : GEO205+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:12:45 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 5.36s 2.65s
% Output : Refutation 6.04s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 7 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 81 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 247 ( 14 ~; 18 |; 10 &; 180 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 25 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 69 ( 0 ^; 69 !; 0 ?; 69 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(convergent_lines_decl,type,
convergent_lines: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(distinct_lines_decl,type,
distinct_lines: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(distinct_points_decl,type,
distinct_points: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(intersection_point_decl,type,
intersection_point: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(apart_point_and_line_decl,type,
apart_point_and_line: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(line_connecting_decl,type,
line_connecting: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ distinct_lines ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ceq3) ).
thf(56,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ distinct_lines ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ distinct_points ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ line_connecting ) @ ( C @ apart_point_and_line ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( C @ distinct_points ) )
& ( A @ ( C @ distinct_points ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con1) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ distinct_points ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ line_connecting ) @ ( C @ apart_point_and_line ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( C @ distinct_points ) )
& ( A @ ( C @ distinct_points ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ apart_point_and_line ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( A @ apart_point_and_line ) )
| ( C @ ( B @ distinct_lines ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ceq2) ).
thf(53,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ apart_point_and_line ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( A @ apart_point_and_line ) )
| ( C @ ( B @ distinct_lines ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ distinct_lines ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( B @ distinct_lines ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ distinct_lines ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',apart5) ).
thf(32,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ distinct_lines ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( B @ distinct_lines ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ distinct_lines ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( B @ convergent_lines ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',apart6) ).
thf(35,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( B @ convergent_lines ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( D @ ( C @ distinct_lines ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ distinct_points ) ) )
=> ( ( D @ ( B @ apart_point_and_line ) )
| ( C @ ( B @ apart_point_and_line ) )
| ( D @ ( A @ apart_point_and_line ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ apart_point_and_line ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cu1) ).
thf(48,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( D @ ( C @ distinct_lines ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ distinct_points ) ) )
=> ( ( D @ ( B @ apart_point_and_line ) )
| ( C @ ( B @ apart_point_and_line ) )
| ( D @ ( A @ apart_point_and_line ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ apart_point_and_line ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ apart_point_and_line ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( C @ apart_point_and_line ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ distinct_points ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ceq1) ).
thf(50,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ apart_point_and_line ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( C @ apart_point_and_line ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ distinct_points ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) )
=> ( ( ( B @ ( C @ apart_point_and_line ) )
| ( A @ ( C @ apart_point_and_line ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ intersection_point ) @ ( C @ distinct_points ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con2) ).
thf(43,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) )
=> ( ( ( B @ ( C @ apart_point_and_line ) )
| ( A @ ( C @ apart_point_and_line ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ intersection_point ) @ ( C @ distinct_points ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ~ ( C @ ( B @ distinct_lines ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) ) )
=> ( ~ ( C @ ( A @ intersection_point ) @ ( B @ ( A @ intersection_point ) @ distinct_points ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ~ ( C @ ( B @ distinct_lines ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) ) )
=> ( ~ ( C @ ( A @ intersection_point ) @ ( B @ ( A @ intersection_point ) @ distinct_points ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(15,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ~ ( C @ ( B @ distinct_lines ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) ) )
=> ( ~ ( C @ ( A @ intersection_point ) @ ( B @ ( A @ intersection_point ) @ distinct_points ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( A @ distinct_points ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',apart1) ).
thf(20,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( A @ distinct_points ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ distinct_points ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( B @ distinct_points ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ distinct_points ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',apart4) ).
thf(29,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ distinct_points ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( B @ distinct_points ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ distinct_points ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',apart3) ).
thf(26,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( A @ convergent_lines ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( A @ distinct_lines ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',apart2) ).
thf(23,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( A @ distinct_lines ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(125,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[56,38,53,32,35,48,50,43,15,20,29,26,23]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : GEO205+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.27/0.52 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.27/0.52 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.27/0.52 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.27/0.52 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.27/0.52 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.27/0.52 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.27/0.52 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.27/0.52 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 13:00:48 UTC 2026
% 0.27/0.52 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/0.52 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.17/1.05 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.50/1.24 % [INFO] Parsing done (184ms).
% 1.50/1.25 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.51/1.61 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.51/1.62 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.75/1.71 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 12 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.75/1.75 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 12 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.75/1.78 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.75/1.78 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.75/1.79 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 5.36/2.65 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.36/2.65 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 5.36/2.65 % Time passed: 1979ms (effective reasoning time: 1390ms)
% 5.36/2.65 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.36/2.65 % Axioms used in derivation (12): apart3, con2, ceq3, apart6, apart4, ceq2, apart5, apart1, con1, apart2, ceq1, cu1
% 5.36/2.65 % No. of inferences in proof: 28
% 5.36/2.65 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1979 ms resp. 1390 ms w/o parsing
% 6.04/2.70 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.04/2.70 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------