%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.7
% Problem : GEO207+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.60s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO207+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 21 07:39:09 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.51/0.60 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 % File :CSE---1.7
% 0.60/0.64 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.64 % Transform :cnf
% 0.60/0.64 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.60/0.64 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.60/0.64 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.60/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 % File : GEO207+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.60/0.64 % Domain : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.60/0.64 % Problem : Irreflexivity of line convergence
% 0.60/0.64 % Version : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.60/0.64 % English : A line is not convergent to itself.
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 % Refs : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.60/0.64 % : [Li97] Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 0.60/0.64 % : [Li98] Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 0.60/0.64 % : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.60/0.64 % Source : [ILTP]
% 0.60/0.64 % Names :
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 % Status : Theorem
% 0.60/0.64 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.60/0.64 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% 0.60/0.64 % Number of atoms : 41 ( 0 equ)
% 0.60/0.64 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% 0.60/0.64 % Number of connectives : 31 ( 6 ~; 11 |; 2 &)
% 0.60/0.64 % ( 0 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.60/0.64 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% 0.60/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.60/0.64 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.60/0.64 % Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.60/0.64 % Number of variables : 38 ( 38 !; 0 ?)
% 0.60/0.64 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.60/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 0.60/0.64 include('Axioms/GEO006+2.ax').
% 0.60/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.60/0.64 ! [X] : ~ convergent_lines(X,X) ).
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 % Proof found
% 0.60/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.64 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.60/0.65 %ClaNum:18(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.60/0.65 %VarNum:94(SingletonVarNum:43)
% 0.60/0.65 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.60/0.65 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.60/0.65 %SharedTerms:2
% 0.60/0.65 %goalClause: 1
% 0.60/0.65 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.60/0.65 [1]P1(a1,a1)
% 0.60/0.65 [2]~P3(x21,x21)
% 0.60/0.65 [3]~P4(x31,x31)
% 0.60/0.65 [4]~P1(x41,x41)
% 0.60/0.65 [5]~P2(x51,f2(x52,x51))
% 0.60/0.65 [6]~P1(f2(x61,x62),x61)
% 0.60/0.65 [7]~P1(x71,x72)+P4(x71,x72)
% 0.60/0.65 [8]~P3(x83,x81)+P3(x81,x82)+P3(x83,x82)
% 0.60/0.65 [9]~P2(x91,x93)+P3(x91,x92)+P2(x92,x93)
% 0.60/0.65 [10]~P4(x103,x101)+P4(x101,x102)+P4(x103,x102)
% 0.60/0.65 [11]~P2(x113,x111)+P4(x111,x112)+P2(x113,x112)
% 0.60/0.65 [12]~P1(x123,x121)+P1(x121,x122)+P1(x123,x122)
% 0.60/0.65 [14]~P1(x142,x143)+~P2(x141,x143)+P3(x141,f3(x142,x143))
% 0.60/0.65 [15]~P1(x152,x153)+~P2(x151,x152)+P3(x151,f3(x152,x153))
% 0.60/0.65 [16]P3(x161,x162)+~P3(x163,x162)+~P2(x161,f4(x163,x162))
% 0.60/0.65 [17]P3(x171,x172)+~P3(x172,x173)+~P2(x171,f4(x172,x173))
% 0.60/0.65 [13]P2(x133,x131)+~P4(x131,x132)+P1(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x132)
% 0.60/0.65 [18]P2(x184,x183)+~P3(x184,x181)+~P4(x183,x182)+P2(x181,x182)+P2(x181,x183)+P2(x184,x182)
% 0.60/0.65 %EqnAxiom
% 0.60/0.65
% 0.60/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.65 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.60/0.65 ($false),
% 0.60/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4]),
% 0.60/0.65 ['proof']).
% 0.60/0.65 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.60/0.65 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------