↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO210+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:34 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.50s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : GEO210+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 08:29:54 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.53  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.57  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.17/0.57  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.57  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.17/0.57  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.17/0.57  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.17/0.57  
% 0.17/0.57  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.17/0.57  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.17/0.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.57  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.57  % File     : GEO210+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.50/0.57  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.50/0.57  % Problem  : Uniqueness of orthogonality
% 0.50/0.57  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 0.50/0.57  % English  : If the point A is incident with line L, and the line L is
% 0.50/0.57  %            orthogonal to M, then L is equal to the orthogonal to M
% 0.50/0.57  %            through A.
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.50/0.57  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.50/0.57  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 0.50/0.57  % Names    : Theorem 8.1 [vPl95]
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.50/0.57  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.21 v5.0.0, 0.10 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.14 v3.5.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.50/0.57  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   7 unt;   0 def)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Number of atoms       :   59 (   0 equ)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Number of connectives :   50 (  14   ~;  16   |;   5   &)
% 0.50/0.57  %                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Number of variables   :   56 (  56   !;   0   ?)
% 0.50/0.57  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.50/0.57  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.57  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.50/0.57  include('Axioms/GEO006+2.ax').
% 0.50/0.57  include('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax').
% 0.50/0.57  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.57  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.50/0.57      ! [A,L,M] :
% 0.50/0.57        ( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(A,L)
% 0.50/0.57          & ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,M) )
% 0.50/0.57       => ~ distinct_lines(L,orthogonal_through_point(M,A)) ) ).
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.57  % Proof found
% 0.50/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.57  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.50/0.58  %ClaNum:28(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.50/0.58  %VarNum:132(SingletonVarNum:59)
% 0.50/0.58  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.50/0.58  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.50/0.58  %SharedTerms:7
% 0.50/0.58  %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 0.50/0.58  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.50/0.58  [2]~P2(a2,a1)
% 0.50/0.58  [3]~P4(a1,a3)
% 0.50/0.58  [1]P1(a1,f4(a3,a2))
% 0.50/0.58  [4]~P5(x41,x41)
% 0.50/0.58  [5]~P1(x51,x51)
% 0.50/0.58  [6]~P3(x61,x61)
% 0.50/0.58  [7]~P2(x71,f7(x72,x71))
% 0.50/0.58  [8]~P2(x81,f4(x82,x81))
% 0.50/0.58  [9]~P3(f7(x91,x92),x91)
% 0.50/0.58  [10]~P4(f4(x101,x102),x101)
% 0.50/0.58  [11]P4(x111,x112)+P3(x111,x112)
% 0.50/0.58  [24]~P5(x241,x242)+~P2(x242,f5(x241,x242))
% 0.50/0.58  [25]~P5(x251,x252)+~P2(x251,f5(x251,x252))
% 0.50/0.58  [26]~P3(x261,x262)+~P2(f6(x261,x262),x262)
% 0.50/0.58  [27]~P3(x271,x272)+~P2(f6(x271,x272),x271)
% 0.50/0.58  [12]~P5(x123,x121)+P5(x121,x122)+P5(x123,x122)
% 0.50/0.58  [13]~P2(x131,x133)+P5(x131,x132)+P2(x132,x133)
% 0.50/0.58  [14]~P1(x143,x141)+P1(x141,x142)+P1(x143,x142)
% 0.50/0.58  [15]~P3(x153,x151)+P1(x151,x152)+P3(x153,x152)
% 0.50/0.58  [16]~P2(x163,x161)+P1(x161,x162)+P2(x163,x162)
% 0.50/0.58  [17]~P3(x173,x171)+P3(x171,x172)+P3(x173,x172)
% 0.50/0.58  [18]P2(x183,x181)+~P1(x181,x182)+P3(x181,x182)+P2(x183,x182)
% 0.50/0.58  [20]~P3(x201,x203)+~P4(x201,x203)+P3(x201,x202)+P4(x203,x202)
% 0.50/0.58  [21]~P3(x213,x211)+~P4(x213,x211)+P3(x211,x212)+P4(x213,x212)
% 0.50/0.58  [22]~P3(x221,x223)+~P4(x221,x223)+P4(x221,x222)+P4(x223,x222)
% 0.50/0.58  [23]P4(x233,x234)+~P1(x233,x232)+P2(x231,x232)+P2(x231,x233)+P4(x232,x234)
% 0.50/0.58  [28]P2(x284,x283)+~P5(x284,x281)+~P1(x283,x282)+P2(x281,x282)+P2(x281,x283)+P2(x284,x282)
% 0.50/0.58  %EqnAxiom
% 0.50/0.58  
% 0.50/0.58  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.58  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.50/0.58     ($false),
% 0.50/0.58     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,1,8,2,10,23]),
% 0.50/0.58     ['proof']).
% 0.50/0.58  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.50/0.58  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------