↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : GEO210+2 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 24 01:38:34 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  19   ~;  11   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   2 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,plain,
    ! [A,L,M] :
      ( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(A,L)
        & ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,M) )
     => ~ distinct_lines(L,orthogonal_through_point(M,A)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(con_negated,plain,
    ~ ! [A,L,M] :
        ( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(A,L)
          & ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,M) )
       => ~ distinct_lines(L,orthogonal_through_point(M,A)) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[con_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

fof(ouo1,plain,
    ! [A,L,M,N] :
      ( distinct_lines(L,M)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(A,L)
        | apart_point_and_line(A,M)
        | unorthogonal_lines(L,N)
        | unorthogonal_lines(M,N) ) ),
    file('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax',ouo1) ).

cnf(24,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(X0,X1)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X0,X2)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X3,X0)
    | apart_point_and_line(X3,X1) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ouo1]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(sK2,orthogonal_through_point(sK3,sK1))
    | unorthogonal_lines(sK2,sK3)
    | unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(sK3,sK1),sK3)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK1,orthogonal_through_point(sK3,sK1)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

fof(ooc1,plain,
    ! [A,L] : ~ unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(L,A),L),
    file('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax',ooc1) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(X0,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ooc1]) ).

cnf(l5,plain,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(sK3,sK1),sK3),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    distinct_lines(sK2,orthogonal_through_point(sK3,sK1)),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[con_negated]) ).

cnf(l2,plain,
    distinct_lines(sK2,orthogonal_through_point(sK3,sK1)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK2,sK3),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[con_negated]) ).

cnf(l3,plain,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK2,sK3),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

fof(ooc2,plain,
    ! [A,L] : ~ apart_point_and_line(A,orthogonal_through_point(L,A)),
    file('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax',ooc2) ).

cnf(23,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,orthogonal_through_point(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ooc2]) ).

cnf(l6,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sK1,orthogonal_through_point(sK3,sK1)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l5,l2,l3,l6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO210+2 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 20 11:42:49 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.13/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.13/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.34  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------