↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : GEO211+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:21:31 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 0.56s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   9   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn   9   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [L] : unorthogonal_lines(L,L),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(c0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [L] : unorthogonal_lines(L,L),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c1,negated_conjecture,
    ? [L] : ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,L),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c0]) ).

fof(c2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X2] : ~ unorthogonal_lines(X2,X2),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c1]) ).

fof(c3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(skolem0001,skolem0001),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c2]) ).

cnf(c4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(skolem0001,skolem0001),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3]) ).

fof(apart3,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ convergent_lines(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart3) ).

fof(c85,plain,
    ! [X] : ~ convergent_lines(X,X),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart3]) ).

fof(c86,plain,
    ! [X53] : ~ convergent_lines(X53,X53),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c85]) ).

cnf(c87,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(X56,X56),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c86]) ).

fof(occu1,axiom,
    ! [L,M] :
      ( convergent_lines(L,M)
      | unorthogonal_lines(L,M) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+3.ax',occu1) ).

fof(c25,plain,
    ! [X14,X15] :
      ( convergent_lines(X14,X15)
      | unorthogonal_lines(X14,X15) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[occu1]) ).

cnf(c26,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X71,X72)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X71,X72) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c25]) ).

cnf(c95,plain,
    unorthogonal_lines(X73,X73),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c26,c87]) ).

cnf(c98,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c95,c4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GEO211+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu May  9 08:13:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.37/0.56  % Version:  1.5
% 0.37/0.56  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.56  
% 0.37/0.56  % Initial clauses    : 26
% 0.37/0.56  % Processed clauses  : 12
% 0.37/0.56  % Factors computed   : 0
% 0.37/0.56  % Resolvents computed: 7
% 0.37/0.56  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.37/0.56  % Forward subsumed   : 0
% 0.37/0.56  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.37/0.56  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.37/0.56  % User time          : 0.186 s
% 0.37/0.56  % System time        : 0.017 s
% 0.37/0.56  % Total time         : 0.203 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------