%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO212+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:27:48 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 74 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 67 ( 21 ~; 34 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 0 sgn 25 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( unorthogonal_lines(X6,X7)
=> ( unorthogonal_lines(X7,X8)
| convergent_lines(X6,X8) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(occu1,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( unorthogonal_lines(X6,X7)
| convergent_lines(X6,X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+3.ax',occu1) ).
fof(apart6,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( convergent_lines(X2,X3)
| convergent_lines(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',apart6) ).
fof(apart3,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',apart3) ).
fof(oac1,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( unorthogonal_lines(X6,X7)
& convergent_lines(X6,X7) )
=> ( ( unorthogonal_lines(X7,X8)
& convergent_lines(X7,X8) )
| ( unorthogonal_lines(X6,X8)
& convergent_lines(X6,X8) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+3.ax',oac1) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X6,X7,X8] :
( unorthogonal_lines(X6,X7)
=> ( unorthogonal_lines(X7,X8)
| convergent_lines(X6,X8) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ unorthogonal_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)
& ~ convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& unorthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X13,X14] :
( unorthogonal_lines(X13,X14)
| convergent_lines(X13,X14) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[occu1]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X23,X24,X25] :
( convergent_lines(X24,X25)
| convergent_lines(X23,X25)
| ~ convergent_lines(X23,X24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[apart6])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ unorthogonal_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X1] : ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart3]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X2,X3)
| convergent_lines(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X22] : ~ convergent_lines(X22,X22),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(esk2_0,X1)
| convergent_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(esk3_0,X2)
| convergent_lines(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(esk2_0,X1)
| convergent_lines(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(esk2_0,X2)
| convergent_lines(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X15,X16,X17] :
( ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X15,X16)
| ~ convergent_lines(X15,X16)
| unorthogonal_lines(X15,X17)
| unorthogonal_lines(X16,X17) )
& ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X15,X16)
| ~ convergent_lines(X15,X16)
| unorthogonal_lines(X15,X17)
| convergent_lines(X16,X17) )
& ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X15,X16)
| ~ convergent_lines(X15,X16)
| convergent_lines(X15,X17)
| unorthogonal_lines(X16,X17) )
& ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X15,X16)
| ~ convergent_lines(X15,X16)
| convergent_lines(X15,X17)
| convergent_lines(X16,X17) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oac1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(X1,esk3_0)
| convergent_lines(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X3,X1)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1)
| convergent_lines(X3,X2)
| unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
unorthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(esk1_0,X1)
| unorthogonal_lines(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_26]),c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO212+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.58 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.58 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.58 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.58 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.58 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.58 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.58 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.58 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 13:29:35 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.58 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.58 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.63 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.63 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.65 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/0.65 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.65 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.65 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.65 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.65 % new_bool_1 with pid 894480 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.16/0.65 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.65 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.65 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.65 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/0.65 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.65 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.65 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.65 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.65 % SubtermCWHack with pid 894485 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/0.65 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.65 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.65 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.65 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/0.65 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.65 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.65 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.65 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.65 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.65
% 0.16/0.65 % Proof found!
% 0.16/0.65 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.65 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.65 % Parsed axioms : 21
% 0.16/0.65 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 6
% 0.16/0.65 % Initial clauses : 20
% 0.16/0.65 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20
% 0.16/0.65 % Processed clauses : 49
% 0.16/0.65 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % ...subsumed : 13
% 0.16/0.65 % ...remaining for further processing : 36
% 0.16/0.65 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Generated clauses : 98
% 0.16/0.65 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 74
% 0.16/0.65 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Paramodulations : 86
% 0.16/0.65 % Factorizations : 12
% 0.16/0.65 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Total rewrite steps : 22
% 0.16/0.65 % ...of those cached : 18
% 0.16/0.65 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.65 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.65 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.65 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.65 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.65 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.65 % Current number of processed clauses : 36
% 0.16/0.65 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.16/0.65 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.16/0.65 % Non-unit-clauses : 24
% 0.16/0.65 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 44
% 0.16/0.65 % ...number of literals in the above : 172
% 0.16/0.65 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 83
% 0.16/0.65 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 73
% 0.16/0.65 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 12
% 0.16/0.65 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.16/0.65 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.65 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2266
% 0.16/0.65 % Search garbage collected termcells : 255
% 0.16/0.65
% 0.16/0.65 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.65 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.65 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.65 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.65 % Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 0.16/0.65
% 0.16/0.65 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.65 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.65 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.65 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.16/0.65 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.16/0.65 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------