↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO213+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:36 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.53s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO213+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 07:34:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.49/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.53/0.65  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.65  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.53/0.65  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.53/0.65  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  % Result      :Theorem 0.050000s
% 0.53/0.65  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.050000s
% 0.53/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  % File     : GEO213+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.53/0.65  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.53/0.65  % Problem  : Corollary to non-orthogonal lines and a third line
% 0.53/0.65  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 0.53/0.65  % English  : If line L is not orthogonal to line M, then a third line N
% 0.53/0.65  %            is distinct from L or not orthogonal to M.
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.53/0.65  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.53/0.65  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 0.53/0.65  % Names    : Corollary 8.4 [vPl95]
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.53/0.65  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.53/0.65  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   7 unt;   0 def)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of atoms       :   59 (   0 equ)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of connectives :   47 (  11   ~;  17   |;   4   &)
% 0.53/0.65  %                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of variables   :   56 (  56   !;   0   ?)
% 0.53/0.65  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.53/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.53/0.65  include('Axioms/GEO006+2.ax').
% 0.53/0.65  include('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax').
% 0.53/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.53/0.65      ! [L,M,N] :
% 0.53/0.65        ( unorthogonal_lines(L,M)
% 0.53/0.65       => ( distinct_lines(L,N)
% 0.53/0.65          | unorthogonal_lines(M,N) ) ) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  % Proof found
% 0.53/0.65  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.53/0.65  %ClaNum:28(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.53/0.65  %VarNum:132(SingletonVarNum:59)
% 0.53/0.65  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.53/0.65  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.53/0.65  %SharedTerms:6
% 0.53/0.65  %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 0.53/0.65  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.53/0.65  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.53/0.65  [2]~P2(a1,a3)
% 0.53/0.66  [3]~P1(a2,a3)
% 0.53/0.66  [4]~P5(x41,x41)
% 0.53/0.66  [5]~P2(x51,x51)
% 0.53/0.66  [6]~P3(x61,x61)
% 0.53/0.66  [7]~P4(x71,f4(x72,x71))
% 0.53/0.66  [8]~P4(x81,f5(x82,x81))
% 0.53/0.66  [9]~P3(f4(x91,x92),x91)
% 0.53/0.66  [10]~P1(f5(x101,x102),x101)
% 0.53/0.66  [11]P1(x111,x112)+P3(x111,x112)
% 0.53/0.66  [24]~P5(x241,x242)+~P4(x242,f6(x241,x242))
% 0.53/0.66  [25]~P5(x251,x252)+~P4(x251,f6(x251,x252))
% 0.53/0.66  [26]~P3(x261,x262)+~P4(f7(x261,x262),x262)
% 0.53/0.66  [27]~P3(x271,x272)+~P4(f7(x271,x272),x271)
% 0.53/0.66  [12]~P5(x123,x121)+P5(x121,x122)+P5(x123,x122)
% 0.53/0.66  [13]~P4(x131,x133)+P5(x131,x132)+P4(x132,x133)
% 0.53/0.66  [14]~P2(x143,x141)+P2(x141,x142)+P2(x143,x142)
% 0.53/0.66  [15]~P3(x153,x151)+P2(x151,x152)+P3(x153,x152)
% 0.53/0.66  [16]~P4(x163,x161)+P2(x161,x162)+P4(x163,x162)
% 0.53/0.66  [17]~P3(x173,x171)+P3(x171,x172)+P3(x173,x172)
% 0.53/0.66  [18]P4(x183,x181)+~P2(x181,x182)+P3(x181,x182)+P4(x183,x182)
% 0.53/0.66  [20]~P3(x201,x203)+~P1(x201,x203)+P3(x201,x202)+P1(x203,x202)
% 0.53/0.66  [21]~P3(x213,x211)+~P1(x213,x211)+P3(x211,x212)+P1(x213,x212)
% 0.53/0.66  [22]~P3(x221,x223)+~P1(x221,x223)+P1(x221,x222)+P1(x223,x222)
% 0.53/0.66  [23]P1(x233,x234)+~P2(x233,x232)+P4(x231,x232)+P4(x231,x233)+P1(x232,x234)
% 0.53/0.66  [28]P4(x284,x283)+~P5(x284,x281)+~P2(x283,x282)+P4(x281,x282)+P4(x281,x283)+P4(x284,x282)
% 0.53/0.66  %EqnAxiom
% 0.53/0.66  
% 0.53/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(31,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (~P2(a3,a1)),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,6,11,14])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(34,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (~P3(a3,a1)),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,6,11,14,15])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(47,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (~P3(f4(a1,x471),a3)),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,9,11,17])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(48,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (~P3(f4(x481,x482),x481)),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[9])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(50,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (~P3(f4(a3,x501),a1)),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,34,9,48,11,17,15])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(65,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (~P3(f4(a3,x651),f4(a1,x652))),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[47,9,11,17])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(89,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (~P3(a1,f4(a3,x891))),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[50,6,11,17])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(112,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (~P3(a1,a2)),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,34,65,6,11,17,20])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(128,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (~P3(f4(a2,x1281),a1)),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[112,89,9,11,17])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(151,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (~P3(a2,a3)),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[112,31,128,6,11,17,15])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(184,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     ($false),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,151,11]),
% 0.53/0.66     ['proof']).
% 0.53/0.66  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.53/0.66  % Total time :0.050000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------