↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO214+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:36 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.55s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : GEO214+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 07:09:24 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.62  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.55/0.62  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.62  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.55/0.62  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.55/0.62  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.55/0.62  
% 0.55/0.62  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.55/0.62  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.55/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.63  % File     : GEO214+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.55/0.63  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.55/0.63  % Problem  : Corollary to non-orthogonal lines and a third line
% 0.55/0.63  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 0.55/0.63  % English  : If the line L is not orthogonal to M, then M is orthogonal to L.
% 0.55/0.63  
% 0.55/0.63  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.55/0.63  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.55/0.63  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 0.55/0.63  % Names    : Corollary 8.5 [vPl95]
% 0.55/0.63  
% 0.55/0.63  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.55/0.63  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.04 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.55/0.63  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   7 unt;   0 def)
% 0.55/0.63  %            Number of atoms       :   58 (   0 equ)
% 0.55/0.63  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.55/0.63  %            Number of connectives :   46 (  11   ~;  16   |;   4   &)
% 0.55/0.63  %                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.55/0.63  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.55/0.63  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.55/0.63  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.55/0.63  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.55/0.63  %            Number of variables   :   55 (  55   !;   0   ?)
% 0.55/0.63  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.55/0.63  
% 0.55/0.63  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.55/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.63  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.55/0.63  include('Axioms/GEO006+2.ax').
% 0.55/0.63  include('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax').
% 0.55/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.63  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.55/0.63      ! [L,M] :
% 0.55/0.63        ( unorthogonal_lines(L,M)
% 0.55/0.63       => unorthogonal_lines(M,L) ) ).
% 0.55/0.63  
% 0.55/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.63  % Proof found
% 0.55/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.63  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.55/0.63  %ClaNum:27(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.55/0.63  %VarNum:132(SingletonVarNum:59)
% 0.55/0.63  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.55/0.63  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.55/0.63  %SharedTerms:4
% 0.55/0.63  %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.55/0.63  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.55/0.63  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.55/0.63  [2]~P1(a2,a1)
% 0.55/0.63  [3]~P2(x31,x31)
% 0.55/0.63  [4]~P3(x41,x41)
% 0.55/0.63  [5]~P4(x51,x51)
% 0.55/0.63  [6]~P5(x61,f3(x62,x61))
% 0.55/0.63  [7]~P5(x71,f4(x72,x71))
% 0.55/0.63  [8]~P4(f3(x81,x82),x81)
% 0.55/0.63  [9]~P1(f4(x91,x92),x91)
% 0.55/0.63  [10]P1(x101,x102)+P4(x101,x102)
% 0.55/0.63  [23]~P2(x231,x232)+~P5(x232,f5(x231,x232))
% 0.55/0.63  [24]~P2(x241,x242)+~P5(x241,f5(x241,x242))
% 0.55/0.63  [25]~P4(x251,x252)+~P5(f6(x251,x252),x252)
% 0.55/0.63  [26]~P4(x261,x262)+~P5(f6(x261,x262),x261)
% 0.55/0.63  [11]~P2(x113,x111)+P2(x111,x112)+P2(x113,x112)
% 0.55/0.63  [12]~P5(x121,x123)+P2(x121,x122)+P5(x122,x123)
% 0.55/0.63  [13]~P3(x133,x131)+P3(x131,x132)+P3(x133,x132)
% 0.55/0.63  [14]~P4(x143,x141)+P3(x141,x142)+P4(x143,x142)
% 0.55/0.63  [15]~P5(x153,x151)+P3(x151,x152)+P5(x153,x152)
% 0.55/0.63  [16]~P4(x163,x161)+P4(x161,x162)+P4(x163,x162)
% 0.55/0.63  [17]P5(x173,x171)+~P3(x171,x172)+P4(x171,x172)+P5(x173,x172)
% 0.55/0.63  [19]~P4(x191,x193)+~P1(x191,x193)+P4(x191,x192)+P1(x193,x192)
% 0.55/0.63  [20]~P4(x203,x201)+~P1(x203,x201)+P4(x201,x202)+P1(x203,x202)
% 0.55/0.63  [21]~P4(x211,x213)+~P1(x211,x213)+P1(x211,x212)+P1(x213,x212)
% 0.55/0.63  [22]P1(x223,x224)+~P3(x223,x222)+P5(x221,x222)+P5(x221,x223)+P1(x222,x224)
% 0.55/0.63  [27]P5(x274,x273)+~P2(x274,x271)+~P3(x273,x272)+P5(x271,x272)+P5(x271,x273)+P5(x274,x272)
% 0.55/0.63  %EqnAxiom
% 0.55/0.63  
% 0.55/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.63  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.56/0.63     (~P4(a1,a2)),
% 0.56/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,5,10,19])).
% 0.56/0.63  cnf(42,plain,
% 0.56/0.63     (~P4(f3(a2,x421),a1)),
% 0.56/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[30,8,10,16])).
% 0.56/0.63  cnf(43,plain,
% 0.56/0.63     (~P4(f3(x431,x432),x431)),
% 0.56/0.63     inference(rename_variables,[],[8])).
% 0.56/0.64  cnf(45,plain,
% 0.56/0.64     (~P3(f3(f4(x451,x452),x452),f4(x451,x452))),
% 0.56/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[30,7,6,8,43,10,16,17])).
% 0.56/0.64  cnf(60,plain,
% 0.56/0.64     (~P4(x601,x601)),
% 0.56/0.64     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 0.56/0.64  cnf(62,plain,
% 0.56/0.64     (~P4(a2,a1)),
% 0.56/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[30,5,60,45,42,4,10,13,14,16])).
% 0.56/0.64  cnf(87,plain,
% 0.56/0.64     ($false),
% 0.56/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,62,10]),
% 0.56/0.64     ['proof']).
% 0.56/0.64  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/0.64  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------