↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO215+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:37 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08  % Problem    : GEO215+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.07/0.26  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.07/0.26  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.07/0.26  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 09:54:09 EDT 2024
% 0.07/0.27  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.43  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.46  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.11/0.46  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.46  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.11/0.46  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.11/0.46  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.11/0.46  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.11/0.46  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  % File     : GEO215+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.46  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.11/0.46  % Problem  : Third line not orthogonal to two convergent lines
% 0.11/0.46  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.11/0.46  % English  : If two lines L and M are convergent, then a third line N is
% 0.11/0.46  %            not orthogonal to L or M.
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.11/0.46  %          : [Li97]  Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 0.11/0.46  %          : [Li98]  Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 0.11/0.46  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.11/0.46  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 0.11/0.46  % Names    :
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.11/0.46  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.14 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.20 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.25 v5.4.0, 0.22 v5.3.0, 0.30 v5.2.0, 0.29 v5.0.0, 0.15 v4.1.0, 0.17 v4.0.1, 0.16 v4.0.0, 0.15 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.11/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   7 unt;   0 def)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :   58 (   0 equ)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Number of connectives :   44 (   7   ~;  17   |;   5   &)
% 0.11/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Number of variables   :   53 (  53   !;   0   ?)
% 0.11/0.46  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  % Comments :  Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.11/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 0.11/0.46  include('Axioms/GEO006+2.ax').
% 0.11/0.46  include('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax').
% 0.11/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.11/0.46      ! [L,M,N] :
% 0.11/0.46        ( convergent_lines(L,M)
% 0.11/0.46       => ( unorthogonal_lines(L,N)
% 0.11/0.46          | unorthogonal_lines(M,N) ) ) ).
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  % Proof found
% 0.11/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.46  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.11/0.46  %ClaNum:28(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.11/0.46  %VarNum:138(SingletonVarNum:62)
% 0.11/0.46  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.11/0.46  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.11/0.46  %SharedTerms:6
% 0.11/0.46  %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 0.11/0.46  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.11/0.46  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.11/0.46  [2]~P3(a1,a3)
% 0.11/0.46  [3]~P3(a2,a3)
% 0.11/0.46  [4]~P4(x41,x41)
% 0.11/0.46  [5]~P5(x51,x51)
% 0.11/0.46  [6]~P1(x61,x61)
% 0.11/0.46  [7]~P2(x71,f4(x72,x71))
% 0.11/0.46  [8]~P2(x81,f5(x82,x81))
% 0.11/0.46  [9]~P1(f4(x91,x92),x91)
% 0.11/0.46  [10]~P3(f5(x101,x102),x101)
% 0.11/0.46  [11]P3(x111,x112)+P1(x111,x112)
% 0.11/0.46  [12]~P1(x121,x122)+P5(x121,x122)
% 0.11/0.46  [13]~P4(x133,x131)+P4(x131,x132)+P4(x133,x132)
% 0.11/0.46  [14]~P2(x141,x143)+P4(x141,x142)+P2(x142,x143)
% 0.11/0.46  [15]~P5(x153,x151)+P5(x151,x152)+P5(x153,x152)
% 0.11/0.46  [16]~P2(x163,x161)+P5(x161,x162)+P2(x163,x162)
% 0.11/0.46  [17]~P1(x173,x171)+P1(x171,x172)+P1(x173,x172)
% 0.11/0.46  [24]~P1(x242,x243)+~P2(x241,x243)+P4(x241,f6(x242,x243))
% 0.11/0.46  [25]~P1(x252,x253)+~P2(x251,x252)+P4(x251,f6(x252,x253))
% 0.11/0.46  [26]P4(x261,x262)+~P4(x263,x262)+~P2(x261,f7(x263,x262))
% 0.11/0.46  [27]P4(x271,x272)+~P4(x272,x273)+~P2(x271,f7(x272,x273))
% 0.11/0.46  [18]P2(x183,x181)+~P5(x181,x182)+P1(x181,x182)+P2(x183,x182)
% 0.11/0.46  [20]~P1(x201,x203)+~P3(x201,x203)+P1(x201,x202)+P3(x203,x202)
% 0.11/0.46  [21]~P1(x213,x211)+~P3(x213,x211)+P1(x211,x212)+P3(x213,x212)
% 0.11/0.46  [22]~P1(x221,x223)+~P3(x221,x223)+P3(x221,x222)+P3(x223,x222)
% 0.11/0.46  [23]P3(x233,x234)+~P5(x233,x232)+P2(x231,x232)+P2(x231,x233)+P3(x232,x234)
% 0.11/0.46  [28]P2(x284,x283)+~P4(x284,x281)+~P5(x283,x282)+P2(x281,x282)+P2(x281,x283)+P2(x284,x282)
% 0.11/0.46  %EqnAxiom
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.47  cnf(34,plain,
% 0.11/0.47     (~P2(f6(a1,a2),a2)),
% 0.11/0.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,6,11,17,24])).
% 0.11/0.47  cnf(35,plain,
% 0.11/0.47     (~P4(x351,x351)),
% 0.11/0.47     inference(rename_variables,[],[4])).
% 0.11/0.47  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.11/0.47     (~P2(f6(a1,a2),a1)),
% 0.11/0.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,35,6,11,17,24,25])).
% 0.11/0.47  cnf(40,plain,
% 0.11/0.47     (~P5(f5(a3,f6(a1,a2)),a1)),
% 0.11/0.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,35,6,8,10,11,17,24,25,23])).
% 0.11/0.47  cnf(44,plain,
% 0.11/0.47     (~P1(f5(a3,f6(a1,a2)),a1)),
% 0.11/0.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,35,6,8,10,11,17,24,25,23,12])).
% 0.11/0.47  cnf(58,plain,
% 0.11/0.47     (~P1(f4(x581,x582),x581)),
% 0.11/0.47     inference(rename_variables,[],[9])).
% 0.11/0.47  cnf(64,plain,
% 0.11/0.47     (~P5(a1,a2)),
% 0.11/0.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[44,3,2,37,34,40,5,7,9,58,11,15,17,18,23])).
% 0.11/0.47  cnf(68,plain,
% 0.11/0.47     ($false),
% 0.11/0.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,64,12]),
% 0.11/0.47     ['proof']).
% 0.11/0.47  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.11/0.47  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------