↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : GEO217+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:17:32 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (  22   ~;   6   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn  10   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(apart3,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ convergent_lines(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',apart3) ).

fof(ax6,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
     => ( convergent_lines(Y,Z)
        | convergent_lines(X,Z) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax6) ).

fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [L,M,N] :
      ( ( ~ convergent_lines(L,N)
        & ~ convergent_lines(L,M) )
     => ~ convergent_lines(M,N) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(con_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [L,M,N] :
        ( ( ~ convergent_lines(L,N)
          & ~ convergent_lines(L,M) )
       => ~ convergent_lines(M,N) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[apart3]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(B,C)
    | convergent_lines(A,C)
    | ~ convergent_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax6]) ).

fof(nnf_18,plain,
    ? [L,M,N] :
      ( convergent_lines(M,N)
      & ~ convergent_lines(L,N)
      & ~ convergent_lines(L,M) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[con_neg]) ).

fof(sk_con_neg,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(sK1,sK2)
    & ~ convergent_lines(sK0,sK2)
    & ~ convergent_lines(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(L,sK0),skolemize(M,sK1),skolemize(N,sK2)],[nnf_18]) ).

cnf(c_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ convergent_lines(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_con_neg]) ).

cnf(c_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ convergent_lines(sK0,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_con_neg]) ).

cnf(c_41,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(sK1,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_con_neg]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(B,A)
    | ~ convergent_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ convergent_lines(sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_39]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(B,A)
    | ~ convergent_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_43,negated_conjecture,
    ~ convergent_lines(sK2,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_40]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(A,sK0)
    | ~ convergent_lines(sK1,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(sK1,sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_43]) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_41,c_54]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO217+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 13:07:17 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.36  % Process 290993 was started by sandbox on n014,
% 0.09/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 13:07:17 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/0.38  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.13/0.38  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.13/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.13/0.38  % Given clauses 24.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------