↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO217+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:39 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 60.04s 60.25s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 60.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO217+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 09:30:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 60.04/60.24  %-------------------------------------------
% 60.04/60.24  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 60.04/60.24  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 60.04/60.24  % Transform   :cnf
% 60.04/60.24  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 60.04/60.24  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 60.04/60.24  
% 60.04/60.24  % Result      :Theorem 59.480000s
% 60.04/60.24  % Output      :CNFRefutation 59.480000s
% 60.04/60.24  %-------------------------------------------
% 60.04/60.25  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 60.04/60.25  % File     : GEO217+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 60.04/60.25  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 60.04/60.25  % Problem  : Transitivity of parallel
% 60.04/60.25  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 60.04/60.25  % English  : If a line L is parallel to the lines M and N, then M and N
% 60.04/60.25  %            are parallel.
% 60.04/60.25  
% 60.04/60.25  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 60.04/60.25  %          : [Li97]  Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 60.04/60.25  %          : [Li98]  Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 60.04/60.25  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 60.04/60.25  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 60.04/60.25  % Names    :
% 60.04/60.25  
% 60.04/60.25  % Status   : Theorem
% 60.04/60.25  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 60.04/60.25  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 60.04/60.25  %            Number of atoms       :   48 (   0 equ)
% 60.04/60.25  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
% 60.04/60.25  %            Number of connectives :   50 (  18   ~;  12   |;   6   &)
% 60.04/60.25  %                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 60.04/60.25  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 60.04/60.25  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 60.04/60.25  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 60.04/60.25  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 60.04/60.25  %            Number of variables   :   41 (  41   !;   0   ?)
% 60.04/60.25  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 60.04/60.25  
% 60.04/60.25  % Comments :  Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 60.04/60.25  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 60.04/60.25  include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 60.04/60.25  include('Axioms/GEO006+4.ax').
% 60.04/60.25  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 60.04/60.25  fof(con,conjecture,
% 60.04/60.25      ! [L,M,N] :
% 60.04/60.25        ( ( ~ convergent_lines(L,M)
% 60.04/60.25          & ~ convergent_lines(L,N) )
% 60.04/60.25       => ~ convergent_lines(M,N) ) ).
% 60.04/60.25  
% 60.04/60.25  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 60.04/60.25  %-------------------------------------------
% 60.04/60.25  % Proof found
% 60.04/60.25  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 60.04/60.25  % SZS output start Proof
% 60.09/60.25  %ClaNum:23(EqnAxiom:0)
% 60.09/60.25  %VarNum:114(SingletonVarNum:50)
% 60.09/60.25  %MaxLitNum:6
% 60.09/60.25  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 60.09/60.25  %SharedTerms:6
% 60.09/60.25  %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 60.09/60.25  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 60.09/60.25  [1]P1(a1,a3)
% 60.09/60.25  [2]~P1(a2,a1)
% 60.09/60.25  [3]~P1(a2,a3)
% 60.09/60.25  [4]~P3(x41,x41)
% 60.09/60.25  [5]~P4(x51,x51)
% 60.09/60.25  [6]~P1(x61,x61)
% 60.09/60.25  [7]P5(x71,x72)+P1(x71,x72)
% 60.09/60.25  [8]~P1(x81,x82)+P4(x81,x82)
% 60.09/60.25  [9]~P3(x93,x91)+P3(x91,x92)+P3(x93,x92)
% 60.09/60.25  [10]~P2(x101,x103)+P3(x101,x102)+P2(x102,x103)
% 60.09/60.25  [11]~P4(x113,x111)+P4(x111,x112)+P4(x113,x112)
% 60.09/60.25  [12]~P2(x123,x121)+P4(x121,x122)+P2(x123,x122)
% 60.09/60.25  [13]~P1(x133,x131)+P1(x131,x132)+P1(x133,x132)
% 60.09/60.25  [14]~P1(x143,x142)+P5(x141,x142)+P5(x141,x143)
% 60.09/60.25  [19]~P1(x192,x193)+~P2(x191,x193)+P3(x191,f4(x192,x193))
% 60.09/60.25  [20]~P1(x202,x203)+~P2(x201,x202)+P3(x201,f4(x202,x203))
% 60.09/60.25  [21]P3(x211,x212)+~P3(x213,x212)+~P2(x211,f5(x213,x212))
% 60.09/60.25  [22]P3(x221,x222)+~P3(x222,x223)+~P2(x221,f5(x222,x223))
% 60.09/60.25  [15]~P1(x152,x153)+~P5(x152,x153)+P1(x151,x152)+P1(x151,x153)
% 60.09/60.25  [16]~P1(x162,x163)+~P5(x162,x163)+P1(x161,x162)+P5(x161,x163)
% 60.09/60.25  [17]~P1(x173,x172)+~P5(x173,x172)+P1(x171,x172)+P5(x171,x173)
% 60.09/60.25  [23]P2(x234,x233)+~P3(x234,x231)+~P4(x233,x232)+P2(x231,x232)+P2(x231,x233)+P2(x234,x232)
% 60.09/60.25  %EqnAxiom
% 60.09/60.25  
% 60.09/60.25  %-------------------------------------------
% 60.09/60.26  cnf(26,plain,
% 60.09/60.26     (P1(a3,a1)),
% 60.09/60.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,6,7,13])).
% 60.09/60.26  cnf(174,plain,
% 60.09/60.26     (~P1(a1,a2)),
% 60.09/60.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,2,8,13])).
% 60.09/60.26  cnf(175,plain,
% 60.09/60.26     (P1(a3,a2)),
% 60.09/60.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[174,26,13])).
% 60.09/60.26  cnf(192,plain,
% 60.09/60.26     ($false),
% 60.09/60.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[175,3,6,13]),
% 60.09/60.26     ['proof']).
% 60.09/60.26  % SZS output end Proof
% 60.09/60.26  % Total time :59.480000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------