↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO218+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:39 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 41.38s 41.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 41.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : GEO218+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 10:22:09 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 41.38/41.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 41.38/41.60  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 41.38/41.60  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 41.38/41.60  % Transform   :cnf
% 41.38/41.60  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 41.38/41.60  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 41.38/41.60  
% 41.38/41.60  % Result      :Theorem 40.820000s
% 41.38/41.60  % Output      :CNFRefutation 40.820000s
% 41.38/41.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 41.38/41.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 41.38/41.61  % File     : GEO218+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 41.38/41.61  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 41.38/41.61  % Problem  : Transitivity of parallel and orthogonal
% 41.38/41.61  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 41.38/41.61  % English  : If two lines L and M are parallel and a third line N is
% 41.38/41.61  %            orthogonal to L, then M is orthogonal to N.
% 41.38/41.61  
% 41.38/41.61  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 41.38/41.61  %          : [Li97]  Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 41.38/41.61  %          : [Li98]  Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 41.38/41.61  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 41.38/41.61  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 41.38/41.61  % Names    :
% 41.38/41.61  
% 41.38/41.61  % Status   : Theorem
% 41.38/41.61  % Rating   : 0.06 v8.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 41.38/41.61  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 41.38/41.61  %            Number of atoms       :   48 (   0 equ)
% 41.38/41.61  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
% 41.38/41.61  %            Number of connectives :   50 (  18   ~;  12   |;   6   &)
% 41.38/41.61  %                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 41.38/41.61  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 41.38/41.61  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 41.38/41.61  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 41.38/41.61  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 41.38/41.61  %            Number of variables   :   41 (  41   !;   0   ?)
% 41.38/41.61  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 41.38/41.61  
% 41.38/41.61  % Comments :  Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 41.38/41.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 41.38/41.61  include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 41.38/41.61  include('Axioms/GEO006+4.ax').
% 41.38/41.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 41.38/41.61  fof(con,conjecture,
% 41.38/41.61      ! [L,M,N] :
% 41.38/41.61        ( ( ~ convergent_lines(L,M)
% 41.38/41.61          & ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,N) )
% 41.38/41.61       => ~ unorthogonal_lines(M,N) ) ).
% 41.38/41.61  
% 41.38/41.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 41.38/41.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 41.38/41.61  % Proof found
% 41.38/41.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 41.38/41.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 41.38/41.61  %ClaNum:23(EqnAxiom:0)
% 41.38/41.61  %VarNum:114(SingletonVarNum:50)
% 41.38/41.61  %MaxLitNum:6
% 41.38/41.61  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 41.38/41.61  %SharedTerms:6
% 41.38/41.61  %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 41.38/41.61  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 41.38/41.61  [1]P1(a1,a3)
% 41.38/41.61  [2]~P2(a2,a1)
% 41.38/41.61  [3]~P1(a2,a3)
% 41.38/41.61  [4]~P4(x41,x41)
% 41.38/41.61  [5]~P5(x51,x51)
% 41.38/41.61  [6]~P2(x61,x61)
% 41.38/41.61  [7]P1(x71,x72)+P2(x71,x72)
% 41.38/41.61  [8]~P2(x81,x82)+P5(x81,x82)
% 41.38/41.61  [9]~P4(x93,x91)+P4(x91,x92)+P4(x93,x92)
% 41.38/41.61  [10]~P3(x101,x103)+P4(x101,x102)+P3(x102,x103)
% 41.38/41.61  [11]~P5(x113,x111)+P5(x111,x112)+P5(x113,x112)
% 41.38/41.61  [12]~P3(x123,x121)+P5(x121,x122)+P3(x123,x122)
% 41.38/41.61  [13]~P2(x133,x131)+P2(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x132)
% 41.38/41.61  [14]~P2(x143,x142)+P1(x141,x142)+P1(x141,x143)
% 41.38/41.61  [19]~P2(x192,x193)+~P3(x191,x193)+P4(x191,f4(x192,x193))
% 41.38/41.61  [20]~P2(x202,x203)+~P3(x201,x202)+P4(x201,f4(x202,x203))
% 41.38/41.61  [21]P4(x211,x212)+~P4(x213,x212)+~P3(x211,f5(x213,x212))
% 41.38/41.61  [22]P4(x221,x222)+~P4(x222,x223)+~P3(x221,f5(x222,x223))
% 41.38/41.61  [15]~P2(x152,x153)+~P1(x152,x153)+P2(x151,x152)+P2(x151,x153)
% 41.38/41.61  [16]~P2(x162,x163)+~P1(x162,x163)+P2(x161,x162)+P1(x161,x163)
% 41.38/41.61  [17]~P2(x173,x172)+~P1(x173,x172)+P2(x171,x172)+P1(x171,x173)
% 41.38/41.61  [23]P3(x234,x233)+~P4(x234,x231)+~P5(x233,x232)+P3(x231,x232)+P3(x231,x233)+P3(x234,x232)
% 41.38/41.61  %EqnAxiom
% 41.38/41.61  
% 41.38/41.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 41.38/41.62  cnf(29,plain,
% 41.38/41.62     (~P2(a1,a3)),
% 41.38/41.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,6,7,13,16])).
% 41.38/41.62  cnf(49,plain,
% 41.38/41.62     (P1(a3,a1)),
% 41.38/41.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[29,6,13,7])).
% 41.38/41.62  cnf(226,plain,
% 41.38/41.62     (~P2(a3,a2)),
% 41.38/41.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,49,3,13,17])).
% 41.38/41.62  cnf(232,plain,
% 41.38/41.62     ($false),
% 41.38/41.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[226,3,6,13,7]),
% 41.38/41.62     ['proof']).
% 41.38/41.62  % SZS output end Proof
% 41.38/41.62  % Total time :40.820000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------