↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO218+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.81s 1.01s
% Output   : Refutation 0.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : GEO218+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 16:06:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Sat Jun 18 16:06:12 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 15059.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.12/0.35  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  19 back subsumes 18.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 20
% 0.18/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 22
% 0.18/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 0.18/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.18/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.18/0.39     distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.18/0.39     distinct function count: 2
% 0.18/0.39     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.81/1.01  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.81/1.01  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Model 3 [ 1 0 159 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Model 4 [ 1 1 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Model 5 [ 2 0 147 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Model 6 [ 2 1 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Model 7 [ 3 0 91 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Model 8 [ 3 1 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.64 sec ----> 112 [binary,111.1,20.1] {+} $F.
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 6.
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.81/1.01  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.81/1.01  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  3 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,A).
% 0.81/1.01  6 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 0.81/1.01  16 [] {+} convergent_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,C)| -convergent_lines(B,C)| -unorthogonal_lines(B,C).
% 0.81/1.01  20 [] {+} -convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 0.81/1.01  21 [] {+} -unorthogonal_lines($c3,$c1).
% 0.81/1.01  22 [] {+} convergent_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,B).
% 0.81/1.01  23 [] {+} unorthogonal_lines($c2,$c1).
% 0.81/1.01  24 [hyper,22,21] {+} convergent_lines($c3,$c1).
% 0.81/1.01  27 [hyper,24,6] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c1,A).
% 0.81/1.01  30 [hyper,27,20] {+} convergent_lines($c1,$c2).
% 0.81/1.01  43 [hyper,30,6] {+} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines($c2,A).
% 0.81/1.01  68 [hyper,43,16,23,unit_del,3] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c2)|unorthogonal_lines(A,$c1).
% 0.81/1.01  111 [hyper,68,21] {-} convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 0.81/1.01  112 [binary,111.1,20.1] {+} $F.
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.81/1.01  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  ============ end of search ============
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  true clauses given          16      (66.7%)
% 0.81/1.01  false clauses given          8
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.81/1.01     3  0         1
% 0.81/1.01     6  0         6
% 0.81/1.01     9  0         19
% 0.81/1.01    12  2         20
% 0.81/1.01    15  0         3
% 0.81/1.01  tot:  2         49      (96.1% true)
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Model 8 [ 3 -6 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.81/1.01  
% 0.81/1.01  Process 15059 finished Sat Jun 18 16:06:13 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------