↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : GEO220+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:39:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  30   ~;   8   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn  15   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(couo1,axiom,
    ! [L,M,N] :
      ( ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,N)
        & ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,M) )
     => ~ convergent_lines(M,N) ),
    file('GEO006+4.ax',couo1) ).

fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [L,M,N] :
      ( ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,N)
        & ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,M) )
     => ~ convergent_lines(M,N) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f_15_1,plain,
    ! [L,M,N] :
      ( ~ convergent_lines(M,N)
      | unorthogonal_lines(L,N)
      | unorthogonal_lines(L,M) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[couo1]) ).

fof(f_15_2,plain,
    ! [U_37,U_36,U_35] :
      ( ~ convergent_lines(U_36,U_35)
      | unorthogonal_lines(U_37,U_35)
      | unorthogonal_lines(U_37,U_36) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_15_1]) ).

cnf(f_15_3,plain,
    ( ~ convergent_lines(U_36,U_35)
    | unorthogonal_lines(U_37,U_35)
    | unorthogonal_lines(U_37,U_36) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_15_2]) ).

fof(f_16_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [L,M,N] :
        ( ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,N)
          & ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,M) )
       => ~ convergent_lines(M,N) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(f_16_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [L,M,N] :
      ( convergent_lines(M,N)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,N)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,M) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_16_1]) ).

fof(f_16_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_40,U_39,U_38] :
      ( convergent_lines(U_39,U_38)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(U_40,U_38)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(U_40,U_39) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_16_2]) ).

fof(f_16_4,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_39,U_38] :
      ( convergent_lines(U_39,U_38)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,U_38)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,U_39) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_40,sK1)],[f_16_3]) ).

fof(f_16_5,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_38] :
      ( convergent_lines(sK2,U_38)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,U_38)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U_39,sK2)],[f_16_4]) ).

fof(f_16_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( convergent_lines(sK2,sK3)
    & ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK3)
    & ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(U_38,sK3)],[f_16_5]) ).

fof(f_16_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( convergent_lines(sK2,sK3)
    & ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK3)
    & ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_16_6]) ).

cnf(f_16_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK2),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_16_7]) ).

cnf(f_16_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK3),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_16_7]) ).

cnf(f_16_10,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(sK2,sK3),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_16_7]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK2),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_16_8]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK3)
    | ~ convergent_lines(sK2,sK3)
    | unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_15_3]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    convergent_lines(sK2,sK3),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_16_10]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK3),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[f_16_9]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t2:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GEO220+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 07:47:08 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.41  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------