%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO220+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.28s 2.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 10 unt; 5 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ parallel_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ji7yf2pi/input.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( parallel_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ji7yf2pi/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( ~ orthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ji7yf2pi/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
orthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ji7yf2pi/input.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
| unorthogonal_lines(X1,X3)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ji7yf2pi/input.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_28,negated_conjecture,
orthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ji7yf2pi/input.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ parallel_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( parallel_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ orthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
orthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
| unorthogonal_lines(X1,X3)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X2) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
orthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
~ unorthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( unorthogonal_lines(X1,esk2_0)
| unorthogonal_lines(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
~ unorthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_49]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : GEO220+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 20:18:23 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.28/2.23 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 7.28/2.23 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.28/2.23 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 7.28/2.23
% 7.28/2.23 # Proof found!
% 7.28/2.23 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.28/2.23 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.28/2.23 # Proof object total steps : 17
% 7.28/2.23 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 7.28/2.23 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 7.28/2.23 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 7.28/2.23 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 7.28/2.23 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 7.28/2.23 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 7.28/2.23 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 7.28/2.23 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 7.28/2.23 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 7.28/2.23 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.28/2.23 # Parsed axioms : 49
% 7.28/2.23 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Initial clauses : 49
% 7.28/2.23 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Initial clauses in saturation : 49
% 7.28/2.23 # Processed clauses : 56
% 7.28/2.23 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # ...subsumed : 5
% 7.28/2.23 # ...remaining for further processing : 51
% 7.28/2.23 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Generated clauses : 62
% 7.28/2.23 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 44
% 7.28/2.23 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 7.28/2.23 # Paramodulations : 34
% 7.28/2.23 # Factorizations : 28
% 7.28/2.23 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Current number of processed clauses : 51
% 7.28/2.23 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 7.28/2.23 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 7.28/2.23 # Non-unit-clauses : 36
% 7.28/2.23 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 36
% 7.28/2.23 # ...number of literals in the above : 99
% 7.28/2.23 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 267
% 7.28/2.23 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 144
% 7.28/2.23 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 7.28/2.23 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 7.28/2.23 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.28/2.23 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1464
% 7.28/2.23
% 7.28/2.23 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.28/2.23 # User time : 0.016 s
% 7.28/2.23 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.28/2.23 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 7.28/2.23 # ...preprocessing : 0.018 s
% 7.28/2.23 # ...main loop : 0.002 s
% 7.28/2.23 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 7.28/2.23
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------