↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO223+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 200.52s 200.74s
% Output   : Refutation 200.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : GEO223+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:46:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Sat Jun 18 18:46:40 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 14079.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 15 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -distinct_lines(A,B)|apart_point_and_line(C,A)|apart_point_and_line(C,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 0.12/0.36  28 back subsumes 27.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [] {-} convergent_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,B).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.40  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.40  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 37
% 0.12/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 43
% 0.12/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 86
% 0.12/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 18
% 0.12/0.40     distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.12/0.40     distinct function count: 4
% 0.12/0.40     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Model 3 [ 3 1 789 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Model 5 [ 13 2 45561 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Model 6 [ 130 1 1435 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Model 7 [ 1261 16 3676 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 200.36 sec ----> 1334 [binary,1333.1,16.1] {-} $F.
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Length of proof is 22.  Level of proof is 12.
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 200.52/200.74  % SZS status Theorem
% 200.52/200.74  % SZS output start Refutation
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  6 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 200.52/200.74  15 [] {+} -distinct_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 200.52/200.74  16 [] {+} -convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(A,B),A).
% 200.52/200.74  19 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 200.52/200.74  20 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,C)|unorthogonal_lines(B,C).
% 200.52/200.74  21 [] {+} -unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(A,B),A).
% 200.52/200.74  26 [] {+} unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)| -convergent_lines(B,C)| -unorthogonal_lines(B,C).
% 200.52/200.74  28 [] {+} unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,C)| -convergent_lines(B,C).
% 200.52/200.74  37 [] {+} -orthogonal_lines(A,B)| -unorthogonal_lines(A,B).
% 200.52/200.74  38 [] {+} -equal_lines(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),orthogonal_through_point(orthogonal_through_point($c1,$c2),$c2)).
% 200.52/200.74  39 [] {+} convergent_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,B).
% 200.52/200.74  41 [] {-} equal_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,B).
% 200.52/200.74  44 [] {-} orthogonal_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,B).
% 200.52/200.74  45 [hyper,39,21] {+} convergent_lines(orthogonal_through_point(A,B),A).
% 200.52/200.74  61 [hyper,45,28] {-} unorthogonal_lines(A,orthogonal_through_point(B,C))|unorthogonal_lines(A,B).
% 200.52/200.74  63 [hyper,45,6] {-} convergent_lines(orthogonal_through_point(A,B),C)|convergent_lines(A,C).
% 200.52/200.74  65 [hyper,41,38] {-} distinct_lines(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),orthogonal_through_point(orthogonal_through_point($c1,$c2),$c2)).
% 200.52/200.74  70 [para_from,41.1.1,45.1.1] {-} convergent_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(B,C),A).
% 200.52/200.74  75 [para_from,41.1.1,16.1.1] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(parallel_through_point(B,C),A).
% 200.52/200.74  160 [hyper,63,26,44] {-} convergent_lines(orthogonal_through_point(A,B),C)|unorthogonal_lines(D,A)|convergent_lines(D,C)|orthogonal_lines(A,C).
% 200.52/200.74  196 [factor,160.1.3,unit_del,21] {-} convergent_lines(orthogonal_through_point(A,B),C)|orthogonal_lines(A,C).
% 200.52/200.74  271 [hyper,70,15] {-} convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(orthogonal_through_point(B,C),A).
% 200.52/200.74  389 [hyper,271,19,44] {-} convergent_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(B,C),D)|convergent_lines(A,D)|orthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(B,C),A).
% 200.52/200.74  402 [factor,389.1.3,unit_del,21] {-} convergent_lines(A,B)|orthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(B,C),A).
% 200.52/200.74  504 [hyper,65,15] {-} convergent_lines(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),orthogonal_through_point(orthogonal_through_point($c1,$c2),$c2)).
% 200.52/200.74  825 [hyper,504,20,61] {-} unorthogonal_lines(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),A)|unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(orthogonal_through_point($c1,$c2),$c2),A)|unorthogonal_lines(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),orthogonal_through_point($c1,$c2)).
% 200.52/200.74  834 [factor,825.1.3,unit_del,21] {+} unorthogonal_lines(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),orthogonal_through_point($c1,$c2)).
% 200.52/200.74  874 [hyper,834,37,196] {-} convergent_lines(orthogonal_through_point(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),A),orthogonal_through_point($c1,$c2)).
% 200.52/200.74  1118 [hyper,874,20,61] {-} unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),A),B)|unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point($c1,$c2),B)|unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),A),$c1).
% 200.52/200.74  1127 [factor,1118.1.3,unit_del,21] {+} unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),A),$c1).
% 200.52/200.74  1259 [hyper,1127,37,402] {-} convergent_lines($c1,parallel_through_point($c1,$c2)).
% 200.52/200.74  1278 [hyper,1259,75] {-} distinct_lines(parallel_through_point(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),A),$c1).
% 200.52/200.74  1326 [para_into,1278.1.1.1,41.1.1] {-} distinct_lines(parallel_through_point(A,B),$c1)|distinct_lines(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),A).
% 200.52/200.74  1331 [factor,1326.1.2] {-} distinct_lines(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),$c1).
% 200.52/200.74  1333 [hyper,1331,15] {-} convergent_lines(parallel_through_point($c1,$c2),$c1).
% 200.52/200.74  1334 [binary,1333.1,16.1] {-} $F.
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  % SZS output end Refutation
% 200.52/200.74  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  ============ end of search ============
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  true clauses given          27      (23.9%)
% 200.52/200.74  false clauses given         86
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74        FALSE     TRUE
% 200.52/200.74     7  1         2
% 200.52/200.74     8  9         1
% 200.52/200.74     9  6         4
% 200.52/200.74    10  91        26
% 200.52/200.74    11  93        22
% 200.52/200.74    12  213       9
% 200.52/200.74    13  5         8
% 200.52/200.74    14  1         22
% 200.52/200.74    15  9         27
% 200.52/200.74    16  6         5
% 200.52/200.74    17  25        14
% 200.52/200.74    18  5         2
% 200.52/200.74    19  15        14
% 200.52/200.74    20  1         8
% 200.52/200.74    21  26        44
% 200.52/200.74    22  4         1
% 200.52/200.74    23  18        55
% 200.52/200.74    24  25        10
% 200.52/200.74    25  16        0
% 200.52/200.74    26  24        0
% 200.52/200.74    27  26        0
% 200.52/200.74    28  16        0
% 200.52/200.74    29  20        0
% 200.52/200.74    31  52        0
% 200.52/200.74    32  24        0
% 200.52/200.74    36  24        0
% 200.52/200.74  tot:  755       274      (26.6% true)
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Model 7 [ 1261 -15398 3676 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 200.52/200.74  
% 200.52/200.74  Process 14079 finished Sat Jun 18 18:50:00 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------