%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : GEO225+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:20:01 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.26s 1.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 2 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 18 ~; 7 |; 10 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn 17 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ci2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X6,X7] :
( ( point(X6)
& point(X7)
& distinct_points(X6,X7) )
=> ? [X1] :
( line(X1)
=> ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,X1)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X7,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(ci1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci2]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X6,X7] :
( ( point(X6)
& point(X7)
& distinct_points(X6,X7) )
=> ? [X1] :
( line(X1)
=> ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,X1)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X7,X1) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci1]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X68,X69] :
( ~ distinct_points(X68,X69)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X69,line_connecting(X68,X69)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X97] :
( point(esk1_0)
& point(esk2_0)
& distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& line(X97)
& ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X97)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X97) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X66,X67] :
( ~ distinct_points(X66,X67)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X66,line_connecting(X66,X67)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(X1,esk2_0))
| ~ distinct_points(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : GEO225+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 4 17:48:34 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.33 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.71 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.71 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.71 % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------