↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO225+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:44 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.42s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO225+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 07:02:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.42/0.59  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.42/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.63  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.42/0.63  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.42/0.63  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.42/0.63  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.42/0.63  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.42/0.63  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.42/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.63  % File     : GEO225+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.42/0.63  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.42/0.63  % Problem  : Existence of line joining distinct points
% 0.42/0.63  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.42/0.63  % English  : Assume orthogonal geometry. Given a point and a line, to find
% 0.42/0.63  %            a point incident with the line.
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.42/0.63  %          : [Li97]  Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 0.42/0.63  %          : [Li98]  Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 0.42/0.63  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.42/0.63  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 0.42/0.63  % Names    :
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.42/0.63  % Rating   : 0.06 v8.2.0, 0.07 v7.5.0, 0.10 v7.4.0, 0.12 v7.3.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.15 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.21 v5.0.0, 0.10 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.42/0.63  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.42/0.63  %            Number of atoms       :   54 (   0 equ)
% 0.42/0.63  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
% 0.42/0.63  %            Number of connectives :   42 (   5   ~;   9   |;  11   &)
% 0.42/0.63  %                                         (   0 <=>;  17  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.42/0.63  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 0.42/0.63  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.42/0.63  %            Number of predicates  :    6 (   6 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.42/0.63  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.42/0.63  %            Number of variables   :   41 (  40   !;   1   ?)
% 0.42/0.63  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.42/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.63  include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 0.42/0.63  include('Axioms/GEO006+5.ax').
% 0.42/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.63  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.42/0.63      ! [A,B] :
% 0.42/0.63        ( ( point(A)
% 0.42/0.63          & point(B)
% 0.42/0.63          & distinct_points(A,B) )
% 0.42/0.63       => ? [X] :
% 0.42/0.63            ( line(X)
% 0.42/0.63           => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(A,X)
% 0.42/0.63              & ~ apart_point_and_line(B,X) ) ) ) ).
% 0.42/0.63  
% 0.42/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.63  % Proof found
% 0.42/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.42/0.63  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.57/0.63  %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.57/0.63  %VarNum:86(SingletonVarNum:39)
% 0.57/0.63  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.57/0.63  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.57/0.63  %SharedTerms:5
% 0.57/0.63  %goalClause: 1 2 3 7 14
% 0.57/0.63  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.57/0.63  [1]P1(a1)
% 0.57/0.63  [2]P1(a2)
% 0.57/0.63  [3]P2(a1,a2)
% 0.57/0.63  [4]~P2(x41,x41)
% 0.57/0.63  [5]~P3(x51,x51)
% 0.57/0.63  [6]~P4(x61,x61)
% 0.57/0.63  [7]P5(a2,x71)+P5(a1,x71)
% 0.57/0.63  [8]~P4(x81,x82)+P3(x81,x82)
% 0.57/0.63  [14]~P4(x141,x142)+P1(f3(x141,x142))
% 0.57/0.63  [9]~P2(x93,x91)+P2(x91,x92)+P2(x93,x92)
% 0.57/0.63  [10]~P5(x101,x103)+P2(x101,x102)+P5(x102,x103)
% 0.57/0.63  [11]~P3(x113,x111)+P3(x111,x112)+P3(x113,x112)
% 0.57/0.63  [12]~P5(x123,x121)+P3(x121,x122)+P5(x123,x122)
% 0.57/0.63  [13]~P4(x133,x131)+P4(x131,x132)+P4(x133,x132)
% 0.57/0.63  [15]~P4(x152,x153)+~P5(x151,x153)+P2(x151,f3(x152,x153))
% 0.57/0.63  [16]~P4(x162,x163)+~P5(x161,x162)+P2(x161,f3(x162,x163))
% 0.57/0.63  [17]P2(x171,x172)+~P2(x173,x172)+~P5(x171,f4(x173,x172))
% 0.57/0.63  [18]P2(x181,x182)+~P2(x182,x183)+~P5(x181,f4(x182,x183))
% 0.57/0.63  [19]P5(x194,x193)+~P2(x194,x191)+~P3(x193,x192)+P5(x191,x192)+P5(x191,x193)+P5(x194,x192)
% 0.57/0.63  %EqnAxiom
% 0.57/0.63  
% 0.57/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.64  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.57/0.64     (P2(a2,a1)),
% 0.57/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,4,9])).
% 0.57/0.64  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.57/0.64     (P5(a2,f4(a2,a1))),
% 0.57/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,20,7,17])).
% 0.57/0.64  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.57/0.64     ($false),
% 0.57/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,29,20,18]),
% 0.57/0.64     ['proof']).
% 0.57/0.64  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.57/0.64  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------