↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : GEO225+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:17:35 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   60 (  24   ~;  14   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (  10 sgn  21   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(apart2,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ distinct_lines(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',apart2) ).

fof(apart5,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( distinct_lines(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_lines(Y,Z)
        | distinct_lines(X,Z) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',apart5) ).

fof(ceq2,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X,Y)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X,Z)
        | distinct_lines(Y,Z) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ceq2) ).

fof(p1,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_lines(X,Y)
     => convergent_lines(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

fof(cp1,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(Y,X),Y),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cp1) ).

fof(cp2,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X,parallel_through_point(Y,X)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cp2) ).

fof(a4,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X,Y)
    <=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a4) ).

fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( distinct_points(A,B)
        & point(B)
        & point(A) )
     => ? [X] :
          ( line(X)
         => ( incident_point_and_line(B,X)
            & incident_point_and_line(A,X) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(con_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( ( distinct_points(A,B)
          & point(B)
          & point(A) )
       => ? [X] :
            ( line(X)
           => ( incident_point_and_line(B,X)
              & incident_point_and_line(A,X) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[apart2]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(B,C)
    | distinct_lines(A,C)
    | ~ distinct_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[apart5]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(A,C)
    | distinct_lines(B,C)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ceq2]) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(A,B)
    | ~ distinct_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[p1]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(A,B),A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cp1]) ).

cnf(c_61,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(A,parallel_through_point(B,A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cp2]) ).

cnf(c_79,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(A,B)
    | incident_point_and_line(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a4]) ).

fof(nnf_36,plain,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( ! [X] :
          ( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(B,X)
            | ~ incident_point_and_line(A,X) )
          & line(X) )
      & distinct_points(A,B)
      & point(B)
      & point(A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[con_neg]) ).

fof(sk_con_neg,plain,
    ( ! [X] :
        ( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(sK1,X)
          | ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,X) )
        & line(X) )
    & distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
    & point(sK1)
    & point(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1)],[nnf_36]) ).

cnf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(sK1,A)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_con_neg]) ).

cnf(c_86,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(parallel_through_point(A,B),A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_94,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,A)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_79]) ).

cnf(c_110,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(B,A)
    | ~ distinct_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_46]) ).

cnf(c_98,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(A,parallel_through_point(A,B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_86]) ).

cnf(c_111,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(A,parallel_through_point(B,C))
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_98]) ).

cnf(c_103,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_61]) ).

cnf(c_106,plain,
    ~ incident_point_and_line(sK0,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_94]) ).

cnf(c_108,plain,
    incident_point_and_line(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_79]) ).

cnf(c_109,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_106]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : GEO225+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.44  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 13:07:51 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.19/0.45  % Process 496540 was started by sandbox2 on n013,
% 0.19/0.45  % Fri Sep 25 13:07:51 2026
% 0.19/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.19/0.48  % Length of proof is 23.
% 0.19/0.48  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.19/0.48  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.19/0.48  % Given clauses 41.
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------