↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GEO226+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:20:01 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   2 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  23   ~;  12   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn  23   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ( line(X6)
        & line(X7)
        & convergent_lines(X6,X7) )
     => ? [X1] :
          ( point(X1)
         => ( incident_point_and_line(X1,X6)
            & incident_point_and_line(X1,X7) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(a4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    <=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).

fof(ci4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci4) ).

fof(ci3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci3) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X6,X7] :
        ( ( line(X6)
          & line(X7)
          & convergent_lines(X6,X7) )
       => ? [X1] :
            ( point(X1)
           => ( incident_point_and_line(X1,X6)
              & incident_point_and_line(X1,X7) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    <=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a4]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X178] :
      ( line(esk1_0)
      & line(esk2_0)
      & convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
      & point(X178)
      & ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X178,esk1_0)
        | ~ incident_point_and_line(X178,esk2_0) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X172,X173] :
      ( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X172,X173)
        | ~ apart_point_and_line(X172,X173) )
      & ( apart_point_and_line(X172,X173)
        | incident_point_and_line(X172,X173) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | incident_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci3]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X113,X114] :
      ( ~ convergent_lines(X113,X114)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X113,X114),X114) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,esk2_0)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X111,X112] :
      ( ~ convergent_lines(X111,X112)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X111,X112),X111) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,esk1_0)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,esk2_0),esk1_0)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : GEO226+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 17:49:34 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.72  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------