↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO227+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:45 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.80s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : GEO227+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 09:59:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.53/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.79  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.79  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.56/0.79  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.79  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.56/0.79  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.56/0.79  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.56/0.79  
% 0.56/0.79  % Result      :Theorem 0.170000s
% 0.56/0.79  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.170000s
% 0.56/0.79  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.80  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.80  % File     : GEO227+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.56/0.80  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.56/0.80  % Problem  : Lines not directed and opposite
% 0.56/0.80  % Version  : [vPl98] axioms.
% 0.56/0.80  % English  :
% 0.56/0.80  
% 0.56/0.80  % Refs     : [vPl98] von Plato (1998), A Constructive Theory of Ordered Aff
% 0.56/0.80  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.56/0.80  %          : [Rat07] Raths (2007), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.56/0.80  % Source   : [Rat07]
% 0.56/0.80  % Names    : Therorem 3.1 [vPl98]
% 0.56/0.80  
% 0.56/0.80  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.56/0.80  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v4.0.0
% 0.56/0.80  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   6 unt;   0 def)
% 0.56/0.80  %            Number of atoms       :  111 (   0 equ)
% 0.56/0.80  %            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
% 0.56/0.80  %            Number of connectives :   87 (  13   ~;  22   |;  25   &)
% 0.56/0.80  %                                         (  10 <=>;  17  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.56/0.80  %            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
% 0.56/0.80  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.56/0.80  %            Number of predicates  :   18 (  18 usr;   0 prp; 1-4 aty)
% 0.56/0.80  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.56/0.80  %            Number of variables   :   83 (  83   !;   0   ?)
% 0.56/0.80  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.56/0.80  
% 0.56/0.80  % Comments :
% 0.56/0.80  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.80  include('Axioms/GEO009+0.ax').
% 0.56/0.80  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.80  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.56/0.80      ! [L,M] :
% 0.56/0.80        ~ ( equally_directed_lines(L,M)
% 0.56/0.80          & equally_directed_opposite_lines(L,M) ) ).
% 0.56/0.80  
% 0.56/0.80  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.80  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.80  % Proof found
% 0.56/0.80  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.80  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.56/0.80  %ClaNum:68(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.56/0.80  %VarNum:311(SingletonVarNum:129)
% 0.56/0.80  %MaxLitNum:10
% 0.56/0.80  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.56/0.80  %SharedTerms:4
% 0.56/0.80  %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.56/0.80  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.56/0.80  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.56/0.80  [2]P9(a1,a2)
% 0.56/0.80  [3]P1(x31,x31)
% 0.56/0.80  [7]~P2(x71,x71)
% 0.56/0.80  [8]~P3(x81,x81)
% 0.56/0.80  [11]~P3(x111,f6(x111))
% 0.56/0.80  [5]~P10(x51,x52)
% 0.56/0.80  [6]~P12(x61,x62)
% 0.56/0.80  [4]P1(f3(x41,x42),x41)
% 0.56/0.80  [12]~P4(x121,f3(x122,x121))
% 0.56/0.80  [13]~P13(x131)+P13(f6(x131))
% 0.56/0.80  [14]P9(x141,x142)+P14(x141,x142)
% 0.56/0.80  [15]P1(x151,x152)+P15(x151,x152)
% 0.56/0.80  [17]~P5(x171,x172)+P14(x171,x172)
% 0.56/0.80  [18]~P5(x181,x182)+P15(x181,x182)
% 0.56/0.80  [19]~P16(x191,x192)+P4(x191,x192)
% 0.56/0.80  [25]~P9(x251,x252)+~P14(x251,x252)
% 0.56/0.80  [26]~P1(x261,x262)+~P15(x261,x262)
% 0.56/0.80  [16]P15(x161,x162)+P15(x161,f6(x162))
% 0.56/0.80  [21]~P14(x211,x212)+P15(x211,f6(x212))
% 0.56/0.80  [22]~P16(x221,x222)+P10(x221,f6(x222))
% 0.56/0.80  [23]~P18(x231,x232)+P12(x231,f6(x232))
% 0.56/0.80  [27]P14(x271,x272)+~P15(x271,f6(x272))
% 0.56/0.80  [40]~P2(x401,x402)+~P4(x402,f4(x401,x402))
% 0.56/0.80  [41]~P2(x411,x412)+~P4(x411,f4(x411,x412))
% 0.56/0.80  [59]~P2(x591,x592)+P1(f4(x591,x592),f6(f4(x592,x591)))
% 0.56/0.80  [50]P2(x501,x502)+~P6(x503,x501,x502)
% 0.56/0.80  [51]P11(x511,x512)+~P6(x512,x513,x511)
% 0.56/0.80  [52]P11(x521,x522)+~P6(x522,x521,x523)
% 0.56/0.80  [60]~P6(x601,x602,x603)+P1(x601,f4(x602,x603))
% 0.56/0.80  [32]P10(x321,x322)+~P4(x321,x322)+P16(x321,x322)
% 0.56/0.80  [36]~P14(x361,x362)+~P15(x361,x362)+P5(x361,x362)
% 0.56/0.80  [24]~P17(x242)+~P13(x241)+P13(f3(x241,x242))
% 0.56/0.80  [57]~P15(x571,x572)+~P15(x571,f6(x572))+~P4(f5(x571,x572),x572)
% 0.56/0.80  [58]~P15(x581,x582)+~P15(x581,f6(x582))+~P4(f5(x581,x582),x581)
% 0.56/0.80  [30]~P15(x303,x301)+P15(x301,x302)+P15(x303,x302)
% 0.56/0.80  [34]~P2(x343,x341)+P2(x341,x342)+P2(x343,x342)
% 0.56/0.80  [35]~P3(x353,x351)+P3(x351,x352)+P3(x353,x352)
% 0.56/0.80  [53]~P8(x532,x533,x531)+P16(x531,x532)+P16(x533,x532)
% 0.56/0.80  [54]P10(x541,x542)+P16(x541,x542)+~P8(x542,x543,x541)
% 0.56/0.80  [55]P10(x551,x552)+P16(x551,x552)+~P8(x552,x551,x553)
% 0.56/0.80  [56]~P8(x562,x561,x563)+P10(x561,x562)+P10(x563,x562)
% 0.56/0.80  [63]~P6(x631,x633,x632)+~P6(x631,x634,x633)+P7(x631,x632,x633,x634)
% 0.56/0.80  [64]~P6(x641,x643,x644)+~P6(x641,x642,x643)+P7(x641,x642,x643,x644)
% 0.56/0.80  [65]~P7(x651,x652,x653,x654)+P6(x651,x652,x653)+P6(x651,x654,x653)
% 0.56/0.80  [66]P6(x661,x663,x662)+P6(x661,x662,x663)+~P7(x661,x664,x662,x663)
% 0.56/0.80  [67]P6(x671,x673,x672)+P6(x671,x672,x673)+~P7(x671,x672,x673,x674)
% 0.56/0.80  [68]~P7(x681,x684,x682,x683)+P6(x681,x682,x683)+P6(x681,x682,x684)
% 0.56/0.80  [37]~P17(x372)+~P17(x371)+~P2(x371,x372)+P13(f4(x371,x372))
% 0.56/0.80  [44]~P15(x441,x442)+P12(x441,x442)+P12(x441,f6(x442))+~P15(x441,f6(x442))
% 0.56/0.80  [42]~P15(x421,x423)+P15(x421,x422)+~P15(x421,f6(x423))+P15(x423,f6(x422))
% 0.56/0.80  [43]~P15(x433,x431)+P15(x431,x432)+~P15(x433,f6(x431))+P15(x433,f6(x432))
% 0.56/0.80  [46]~P13(x462)+~P13(x461)+~P15(x461,x462)+~P15(x461,f6(x462))+P17(f5(x461,x462))
% 0.56/0.80  [62]~P2(x622,x623)+~P11(x623,x621)+~P11(x622,x621)+P6(x621,x622,x623)+~P1(x621,f4(x622,x623))
% 0.56/0.80  [61]P10(x614,x613)+~P2(x614,x611)+~P3(x613,x612)+P10(x611,x612)+P10(x611,x613)+P10(x614,x612)+P10(x611,f6(x612))+P10(x611,f6(x613))+P10(x614,f6(x612))+P10(x614,f6(x613))
% 0.56/0.80  %EqnAxiom
% 0.56/0.80  
% 0.56/0.80  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.80  cnf(542,plain,
% 0.56/0.80     (P15(a1,f6(a2))),
% 0.56/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,26,16])).
% 0.56/0.80  cnf(547,plain,
% 0.56/0.80     ($false),
% 0.56/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,542,26,27,25]),
% 0.56/0.80     ['proof']).
% 0.56/0.80  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/0.80  % Total time :0.170000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------