↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : GEO229+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:08:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    7 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3))
     => ~ unequally_directed_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2,X3] :
        ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3))
       => ~ unequally_directed_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ $true,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : GEO229+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 16:47:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI
% 0.12/0.36  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.12/0.36  #
% 0.12/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  # Proof found!
% 0.12/0.36  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.36  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.36  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------