↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO230+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GEO230+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:23:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Sat Jun 18 18:23:08 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 12705.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.13/0.36  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.36  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|unequally_directed_lines(A,C)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(C))|unequally_directed_lines(B,reverse_line(C)).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -left_convergent_lines(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36,37] {-} -distinct_points(A,B)| -left_apart_point(A,C).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36] {-} -left_apart_point(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36] {-} -left_apart_point(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(B,C)|distinct_lines(B,C).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,37] {-} -left_convergent_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 0.13/0.36  36 back subsumes 17.
% 0.13/0.36  36 back subsumes 16.
% 0.13/0.36  36 back subsumes 15.
% 0.13/0.36  36 back subsumes 14.
% 0.13/0.36  36 back subsumes 12.
% 0.13/0.36  36 back subsumes 11.
% 0.13/0.36  36 back subsumes 3.
% 0.13/0.36  36 back subsumes 2.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 49
% 0.13/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 51
% 0.13/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 96
% 0.13/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 88
% 0.13/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 18
% 0.13/0.39     distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.13/0.39     distinct function count: 4
% 0.13/0.39     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.08 sec ----> 248 [binary,247.1,26.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  Length of proof is 15.  Level of proof is 8.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  26 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 0.19/0.46  27 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 0.19/0.46  30 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(A,A).
% 0.19/0.46  31 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,C)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 0.19/0.46  35 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|left_convergent_lines(A,B)|left_convergent_lines(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.19/0.46  36 [] {+} -left_apart_point(A,B).
% 0.19/0.46  37 [] {+} -left_convergent_lines(A,B).
% 0.19/0.46  48 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting(A,B),reverse_line(line_connecting(B,A))).
% 0.19/0.46  50 [] {-} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|left_apart_point(A,C)|left_apart_point(B,C)|left_apart_point(A,D)|left_apart_point(B,D)|left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(C))|left_apart_point(B,reverse_line(C))|left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(D))|left_apart_point(B,reverse_line(D)).
% 0.19/0.46  51 [copy,50,unit_del,36,36,36,36,36,36,36,36] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D).
% 0.19/0.46  59 [] {+} distinct_points($c2,$c1).
% 0.19/0.46  60 [] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),line_connecting($c1,$c2))|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c1,$c2),line_connecting($c2,$c1)).
% 0.19/0.46  61 [hyper,59,27] {+} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points($c1,A).
% 0.19/0.46  63 [hyper,60,31] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),line_connecting($c1,$c2))|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c1,$c2),A)|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),A).
% 0.19/0.46  66 [hyper,63,31] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),line_connecting($c1,$c2))|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),A)|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c1,$c2),B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,B).
% 0.19/0.46  70 [hyper,63,31] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),line_connecting($c1,$c2))|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c1,$c2),A)|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,B).
% 0.19/0.46  71 [hyper,61,27] {+} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points($c2,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 0.19/0.46  120 [hyper,66,35,66,unit_del,37,37,factor_simp] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),line_connecting($c1,$c2))|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),A)|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),C)|unequally_directed_lines(C,B).
% 0.19/0.46  133 [factor,120.2.5,unit_del,30] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),line_connecting($c1,$c2))|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),A)|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(A)).
% 0.19/0.46  158 [hyper,133,48] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),line_connecting($c1,$c2))|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),line_connecting(A,A)).
% 0.19/0.46  167 [hyper,158,35,66,unit_del,37,37,30,factor_simp] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),line_connecting($c1,$c2))|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c1,$c2),reverse_line(line_connecting(A,A))).
% 0.19/0.46  180 [hyper,71,26] {+} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points(A,$c2).
% 0.19/0.46  197 [hyper,70,35,133,unit_del,37,37,factor_simp] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),line_connecting($c1,$c2))|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c1,$c2),A)|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|unequally_directed_lines(B,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.19/0.46  216 [factor,197.3.4] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),line_connecting($c1,$c2))|unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting($c1,$c2),A)|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(A)).
% 0.19/0.46  243 [hyper,216,35,167,unit_del,48,37,37,factor_simp] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),line_connecting($c1,$c2)).
% 0.19/0.46  247 [hyper,243,51,180] {-} distinct_points($c1,A).
% 0.19/0.46  248 [binary,247.1,26.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  true clauses given           9      (28.1%)
% 0.19/0.46  false clauses given         23
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.19/0.46     6  0         1
% 0.19/0.46     9  0         4
% 0.19/0.46    11  0         1
% 0.19/0.46    12  0         7
% 0.19/0.46    15  0         4
% 0.19/0.46  tot:  0         17      (100.0% true)
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  Process 12705 finished Sat Jun 18 18:23:08 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------