%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO234+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.44s 1.65s
% Output : Refutation 1.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : GEO234+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 06:19:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Sat Jun 18 06:19:58 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 19860.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|unequally_directed_lines(A,C)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(C))|unequally_directed_lines(B,reverse_line(C)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -left_convergent_lines(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36,37] {-} -distinct_points(A,B)| -left_apart_point(A,C).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36] {-} -left_apart_point(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36] {-} -left_apart_point(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(B,C)|distinct_lines(B,C).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,37] {-} -left_convergent_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 17.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 16.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 15.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 14.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 12.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 11.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 3.
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 2.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.44/0.62
% 0.44/0.62 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.44/0.62
% 0.44/0.62 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.44/0.62
% 0.44/0.62
% 0.44/0.62 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.44/0.62
% 0.44/0.62 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.44/0.62 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.44/0.62 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.44/0.62 number of clauses in intial UL: 51
% 0.44/0.62 number of clauses initially in problem: 52
% 0.44/0.62 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 98
% 0.44/0.62 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.44/0.62 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.44/0.62 absolute distinct symbol count: 19
% 0.44/0.62 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.44/0.62 distinct function count: 4
% 0.44/0.62 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.44/0.62
% 0.44/0.62 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.44/0.62
% 0.44/0.62
% 0.44/0.62
% 0.44/0.62 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.44/0.62
% 0.44/0.62 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.44/1.65 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.44/1.65 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 1.28 sec ----> 199 [hyper,73,35,63,unit_del,53,37,37] {-} $F.
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 3.
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.44/1.65 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.44/1.65 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 31 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,C)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 1.44/1.65 35 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|left_convergent_lines(A,B)|left_convergent_lines(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 1.44/1.65 37 [] {+} -left_convergent_lines(A,B).
% 1.44/1.65 52 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines($c3,$c1).
% 1.44/1.65 53 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines($c2,reverse_line($c1)).
% 1.44/1.65 61 [] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c3,reverse_line($c2)).
% 1.44/1.65 62 [hyper,61,31] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c3,A)|unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line($c2),A).
% 1.44/1.65 63 [hyper,62,52] {-} unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line($c2),$c1).
% 1.44/1.65 66 [hyper,62,35,61,unit_del,37,37] {-} unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line($c2),$c2).
% 1.44/1.65 73 [hyper,66,31] {-} unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line($c2),A)|unequally_directed_lines($c2,A).
% 1.44/1.65 199 [hyper,73,35,63,unit_del,53,37,37] {-} $F.
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.44/1.65 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 ============ end of search ============
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 1.44/1.65 false clauses given 26
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 FALSE TRUE
% 1.44/1.65 6 2 0
% 1.44/1.65 7 15 0
% 1.44/1.65 8 11 0
% 1.44/1.65 9 23 0
% 1.44/1.65 10 14 0
% 1.44/1.65 11 11 0
% 1.44/1.65 12 14 0
% 1.44/1.65 13 8 0
% 1.44/1.65 15 4 0
% 1.44/1.65 tot: 102 0 (0.0% true)
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.44/1.65
% 1.44/1.65 Process 19860 finished Sat Jun 18 06:20:00 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------